Welcome Back Kotter

The cast of Welcome Back Kotter (Hegyes is top right in this photo)

Welcome Back Kotter was one of my favorite shows when I was a kid. And Juan Epstein was one of my favorite characters on the show. Hegyes (60) died of a heart attack in New Jersey.

Hegyes, who had a mop of dark curly hair, played Juan Luis Pedro Phillipo de Huevos Epstein on “Welcome Back, Kotter,” which also starred John Travolta, Lawrence Hilton-Jacobs and Ron Palillo as wise-cracking students at a Brooklyn high school who were mentored by their teacher, played by Gabe Kaplan. It aired on ABC from 1975 to 1979.

Of Hungarian and Italian descent, Hegyes was born May 7, 1951, in Perth Amboy, N.J. He graduated from what is now Rowan University in Glassboro, N.J., and worked as a substitute teacher between acting jobs before landing the part in “Welcome Back, Kotter.”

After the show ended, he played Chico Marx onstage in a national touring production of “Groucho” with Kaplan in the title role. Hegyes later had a recurring part as Detective Manny Esposito on the 1980s TV police drama “Cagney and Lacey,” did stand-up comedy and tried writing screenplays.

But he would be best remembered for “Welcome Back, Kotter.”

Rest in peace, Hegyes. Thank you for the years of laughter you brought me as a kid. In remembrance, I’m taking the rest of the day off from work and blogging (I have a note from Epstein’s mother excusing me…)

 

Of course, if the MFM had done any vetting of Obama before November 2008, he never would have become President.

The questions, via John Hawkins at Town Hall, include:

  1. Fast and Furious — should Holder resign, and…”Were you aware that was going on and if so, shouldn’t you resign?”
  2. Solyndra — “What do you say to people who say this is evidence of corruption in your administration?”
  3. Unions — Obama effectively gave the autoworkers unions billions in tax payer dollars and control of Chrysler and GM. “What do you say to people who view this as corruption on a scale never before seen in American history?”
  4. Obamacare — “Since the American people have rejected your health care reform and it doesn’t do what you said it would, shouldn’t you work with the Republicans to repeal it?”
  5. Nobel Peace Prize —  ”If they could, don’t you think the Nobel Committee would take back the Nobel Peace Prize that you were awarded?”

Go read his post for the others.

What are some other questions that the MFM should be asking Obama? Such as…

  • Where are your college records, and why won’t you release them?
  • On your next extravagant family vacation, is it possible that you and Michelle could take just one jumbo jet instead of flying in his & her’s jets on the tax payer dime?
  • You’ve blamed President Bush for all of our policy failures. You’ve been at the helm of this nation for three years; how much longer until you start owning some of this and taking responsibility?
  • Do you know what the word “recess” means, and can if so, can you see how your recess appointments — made while Congress was in session — are clearly unconstitutional?
  • You’re still smoking dope and snorting coke, aren’t you?

Whatcha got?

 

For background info on this historic event and the livestream link, click here. The administrative hearing began at 8a.m. CST.

What is really interesting in this hearing is that neither Obama or his attorney will attend. Also, the findings of the hearing will be presented to the Georgia Secretary of State, who is the highest election authority of the state.

Yesterday, the Georgia SoS was informed neither Obama or his counsel would attend and he replied to counsel with the following letter:

Should the SoS rule Obama is ineligible to appear on the Georgia ballot it should be noted that Georgia represents 15 electoral college votes. However, there is some question that if one state doesn’t allow him on their ballot other states will not either, but haven’t had time to research to discover what is true. What we do know is this is being heard today and there are several other states with eligibility challenges pending.

 
Debbie Bosanek

Warren Buffett’s secretary…a useful prop during Obama’s last (and I mean last ever!) State of the Union campaign speech…is supposedly the Democrat party’s poster girl for the burdens of an unfair tax code. From the way they’ve used her (and she truly has been a useful tool to Democrats), you’d think the poor girl was making $35K a year, without employer-provided healthcare benefits, while paying most of that paltry salary in unfair and over-burdensome taxes.

But facts are a funny thing (that tend to get in the way of the Liberal agenda). As it turns out, not only is Mr. Buffett in the 1% (at the very top of that group, btw), but, it appears that so is his poor, beleaguered secretary. According to Forbes, Buffet’s secretary, Debbie Bosanek, earns a not-too-shabby $200-500K salary.

Bosanek’s prominent role in Obama’s “fairness” campaign piqued my curiosity, and I imagine the curiosity of others. How much does her boss pay this downtrodden woman? So far, no one has volunteered this information.

We can get an approximate answer by consulting IRS data on tax rates by adjusted gross income, which would approximate her salary, assuming she does not have significant dividend, interest or capital-gains income (like her boss).

[snip]

We must wait for further details to learn how much more than $200,000 she earns. The tax tables tell us about average ranges. For all we know she earns closer to a half million each year, but that is pure speculation.

I have nothing against Debbie Bosanke earning a half million or even more. Buffet is a major player in the world economy. His secretary deserves good compensation. At her income, however, she is scarcely the symbol of injustice that Obama wishes her to project.

Poor little thing. Makes you wonder how she gets by. Reminds me of the time that Queen Mee-chelle lamented about her “daily struggles to get by:”

I have to say that my life now is not really that much different from many of yours. I wake up every morning wondering how on earth I am going to pull off that next minor miracle to get through the day. I know that everybody in this room is going through this. That is the dilemma women face today. Every woman that I know, regardless of race, education, income, background, political affiliation, is struggling to keep her head above water.

As I wrote back in 2008 when she uttered this bullshit, “This self-righteous bitch thinks it’s actually a minor miracle that she can get through her days of affluence and privilege. ” If Mee-chelle can barely get by on their millions of dollars per year in income and book royalties, imagine what type of major miracle Ms. Bosanek needs to get by on only a half million per year?

 

Despite the empty (and plagiarized) rhetoric from last night’s State of the Union (grave), we’re not “getting stronger.” Things in this country are worse in every measurable way since Obama took office, and the line has not stopped trending downward yet. And it won’t until he’s out of office.

Niles Gardiner does what our own complicit lapdog MFM won’t do — he tells the ugly truth about Obama’s lies and empty promises from last night (sadly, we have to turn to the foreign press to get any truth or objectivity these days):

Two words hardly mentioned in Barack Obama’s 65-minute State of the Union address to Congress: freedom and liberty. President Obama’s fourth and possibly last State of the Union speech was long on big government proposals, but short on the principles that have made America the world’s greatest power. His lecturing tone exuded arrogance, and he failed to present a coherent vision for getting the United States back on its feet after three years of economic decline. It was heavy on class-war rhetoric, punitive taxation, and frequent references to the Left-wing mantra of “fairness”, hardly likely to instil confidence in a battered business community that is the lifeblood of the American economy.

Above all, he remains in denial over the levels of federal debt that threaten the country’s long-term prosperity. This was not a speech that was serious about the biggest budget deficits since World War Two. There was no sense at all that America is a superpower on a precipice, sinking in a sea of debt that threatens to undermine America’s power to project global leadership  for generations to come. In fact, his interventionist proposals will only make matters worse.

From new federally funded infrastructure projects to increasing regulations on financial institutions, President Obama remains wedded to big government – an approach rejected by a clear majority of Americans, who view it as a millstone around their necks. As Gallup’s polling has found, nearly two thirds of Americans see big government as “the biggest threat” to their country.

This should have been a serious speech addressing the economic problems facing the United States. Instead it was a laundry list of half-baked proposals designed to appease the Left. The president should have been talking about reining in spending, lowering taxes, and fostering greater economic freedom, but he opted for policies that will speed America’s decline, not reverse it.

It is a pity that Mr Obama’s uninspired speechwriters did not spend a bit more time learning from both the policies and the message of a truly visionary president, Ronald Reagan…

Well, that’s because (unfortunately) Obama is no Ronald Reagan.

Go read the rest. Then send it to your Liberal friends.

 

This question wasn’t supposed to be asked, they have been telling us for months of the “inevitable” nomination of their moderate choice, Romney. With their choice being exposed as anything but “inevitable,” the establishment is throwing a temper tantrum after the South Carolina results while reaching for the panic button.

I thought Gov. Mitch Daniels, another moderate Republican, giving the SOTU rebuttal for the GOP an odd choice, considering he took himself out of consideration as a candidate months ago. Today many are extolling his address last night as a benchmark of conservative thought.

When I heard the other day Daniels would be giving the rebuttal address, I was baffled. Is he an up and comer in the GOP as Gov. Jindal of Louisiana was believed to be several years ago?

Then I came across this post yesterday at RealClearPolitics that I thought was interesting:
Andrea Mitchell: Romney Adviser Said Party Elites Will Find Alternative If Romney Can’t Win Florida.

“I talked to a top Romney adviser tonight who said, ‘Look, if Mitt Romney cannot win in Florida then we’re going to have to try to reinvent the smoke-filled room which has been democratized by all these primaries. And we’re going to have try to come with someone as an alternative to Newt Gingrich who could be Jeb Bush, Mitch Daniels, someone.’ Because there is such a desperation by the so-called party elites, but that’s exactly what Gingrich is playing against,” Andrea Mitchell said on NBC tonight after the debate.

Interesting!

Of course the source of this information has to be considered. An anonymous Romney advisor tells Andrea Mitchell, a reliable liberal representative of the D.C. establishment and wife of Alan Greenspan. However, if Ms. Mitchell is accurate and the anonymous person who related that info to her is believable, then we not only have further proof that Romney’s “inevitable” nomination was a lie designed to shape public opinion, but further evidence that the establishment is determined to select our nominee for us.

As of this writing, the current polling numbers for the race in Florida are not favorable to Romney or the establishment. RealClearPolitics poll average shows Gingrich trending up with a +4 lead over Romney nationally.

We will have to wait and see what happens, but at this point I seriously doubt the establishment will dump their moderate choice in Romney and replace him with another moderate. They will most likely continue to excoriate conservatives for not falling into line and voting for their choice and possibly rig the outcomes in upcoming states.

There is no love for conservatives in the establishment, never has been. Any candidate that promotes conservative principles such as lower taxes, less government, more freedom and personal responsibility might as well be driving a stake covered with Holy water and garlic juice through the heart of a vampire.

An excellent post from NewsMax addresses how the establishment feels about conservatives:

Fearing Gingrich, Both Sides Say He’s Unelectable

What do establishment Republicans and liberal Democrats have in common? They’ve long labored under a shared misconception: conservative candidates are unelectable.

In 1980, conventional wisdom held that Ronald Reagan didn’t stand a chance against Jimmy Carter. The GOP leadership, the mainstream media and liberal politicos alike lined up against the Gipper in an attempt to derail his presidential campaign.

Rush Limbaugh recently addressed this phenomenon on his radio program: “Gerald Ford said that Ronald Reagan was unelectable. George H.W. Bush said that Ronald Reagan was unelectable. The entire Republican establishment thought Ronald Reagan was unelectable because they were governed and informed by the Goldwater landslide defeat. That’s what they think will happen to every conservative.”

That’s what they think will happen to Newt Gingrich.

I don’t know what the final outcome of the GOP primary will be. In the meantime, I will continue enjoying watching the angst of the establishment.

 

Rodrigo Hernandez

UPDATE: He’s dead.

Among Hernandez’s final statements, he said: “I want to tell everybody that I love everybody. Keep your heads up,” according to the Department of Criminal Justice spokesman. “We are all family, people of God almighty.”

Shortly before lapsing into unconsciousness, he said: “This stuff stings, man,” according to Jason Clark, the department spokesman.

______________

  • Thug: Rodrigo Hernandez  (34 at time of offense)
  • Date of Execution: January 26, 2012, sometime shortly after 6:00 pm HTT
  • Date of Crime:February 18, 1994
  • Victim(s):  Susan Verstegen (38), Muriel Stoepker (77)
  • Last Meal: A special cocktail consisting of : pentobarbital, pancuronium bromide, and potassium chloride (and whatever they happened to serve in the dining facility that day, thanks forever to Cleve Foster)
  • Final Words: ”This stuff stings, man.”

The first execution of 2012 in Texas (the month’s almost over, fellas — what’s taking so long) is scheduled for Thursday, January 26, Rodrigo Hernandez will be put to death for the February 18, 1994 kidnap, rape, and murder of 38-year old  Susan Verstegen in Bexar County.

Facts of the case here at the Texas Attorney General’s office.

…in the early morning hours of February 18, 1994, victim Susan Verstegen was re-stocking snack products at a San Antonio grocery store from the storage bin in back of the store. While working at the storage bin, Verstegen was attacked, sexually assaulted, and strangled by Hernandez.

Much more detail is also available at My San Antonio.

The crime might have gone unsolved, except that…as it turns out…the murderous piece-of-shit thug couldn’t help himself and had to kill again. This time a homeless woman, 77-year old Muriel Stoepker from Grand Rapids, MI. DNA from the Grand Rapids case matched DNA samples taken at the San Antonio murder showed that Hernandez was responsible for both. Hernandez later confessed to the murder of Verstegen, describing in writing how he attacked and killed her.

A confession that Hernandez now denies.

The Death Penalty is needed precisely for animals like Hernandez, who are completely unable to prevent themselves from harming others. His prior criminal history includes:

During the penalty phase of Hernandez’s trial, jurors learned that Hernandez had been convicted of multiple criminal offenses in Michigan. In 1992, Hernandez had been placed on probation for burglarizing a sporting goods store; however, he had committed numerous violations of the conditions of that probation. As a “youthful offender” facing sentencing for his first felony, Hernandez had been granted probation for burglarizing a home, but did not successfully complete the probation and was sentenced to jail. He had also been convicted of felony assault with intent to do great bodily harm, indecent exposure, and misdemeanor malicious destruction of property and engaging in an illegal gambling business. A former high-school girlfriend testified that Hernandez had assaulted her.

Meanwhile, the freaks at Prison Talk are claiming that Hernandez should be spared because he’s retarded. Me thinks perhaps they project a but too much…

 
Obama giving a speech

I know I've been in charge for three years, but this is not my fault. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have a family vacation to plan and a round of golf to get to.

My plan for tuning out Obama’s State of the Union tonight? I’ m not going to have the television on at all while he’s speaking. The last thing I need is to have to buy another television set after I throw something through it after his umpteenth lie.

Since I didn’t get a chance to clean my .45 ACP and .40 S&W after my range outing this weekend,  I’ll do that instead.

Besides, I already know what he’s going to say: Bush’s fault. I inherited this mess. Fair share. Blah, blah, blah, four more years, blah, blah, blah.

No thanks. I know the state of the union that you’ve created, Mr. Soetoro — it’s unbelievably worse than it was 3 years after you took over.

Over at Canada Free Press, some advice on tuning out Obama from our neighbors to the north, who are probably a bit more than pissed at Obama a week after he slapped down the Keystone XL pipeline:

Tonight the undocumented 44th President of the United States of America will deliver an absolutely partisan election-year call for a “return to American values” of economic fairness, in a State of the Union Address.

Like everything else he does, Soetoro-Obama’s State of the Union rests on the politics of ego, to be delivered to a captive audience among the kind of Hollywood props that have long marked his tiresome tenancy at the White House.

[snip]

Even before he utters a single word, the mainstream media that reams out all-Obama propaganda, will be rushing videos and sound bites claiming it was the ‘State of the Union Address of the Century’.

While countless mothers try to stretch out the evening meal of Kraft dinner and rehearse their children to rush the door to welcome their father home from another unsuccessful day of landing a job, Obama will drone on about how everything is alright.  There will be jobs provided by him and only him; there will be government money to save the house and farm mortgage and food stamps for all who need them.

But everything is not alright, and there is nothing Obama can say that matters because the only words that count to patriots are the ones he should take back and bury with the dog’s backyard bone:  “The fundamental Transformation of America”.

The “undocumented 44th President” — what a perfect description of our foisted-upon-us Dear Leader.

 
John Kiriakou

John Kiriakou: American traitor

A (fomer) CIA officer and former Senate Foreign Affairs staffer (for John Kerry D-MA, feign surprise), has been charged with four counts of leaking classified information about other CIA agents to MFM journalists (you can download the criminal complaint here):

John Kiriakou, who served for 14 years in the agency, is accused of revealing the names of other covert operatives who interrogated suspected al Qaeda financier Abu Zubaydah.
The terror suspect was allegedly waterboarded 83 times.

The counts against Kiriakou (a Greek-American) are:

1) …having learned the identity of a covert agent as a result of having access to classified information, intentionally disclosed information identifying such covert agent to an individual not authorized to receive classified information…

Oh, and the person you disclosed it to, showed it to his terrorist clients and other terrorists who most likely would have an interest in killing this agent and/or his family.

2) …lawfully having had access to and been entrusted with information relating to the national defense, namely the association of Officer B with the CIA’s Rendition, Detention, Interrogation (RDI) Program and with an operation to locate and capture Abu Zubaydah, which information the defendent had reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States and to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicated and transmitted the same to Journalist B, a person not entitled to receive it.

Remember when the paper that Journalist B works for (The NY Times) refused to publish cartoons of Prophet Mohammed (piss be upon him) becaue it was dangerous and might incite “pious” Muslims to harm (and by harm, I mean “cut off their heads”) the NY Times and/or its employees? Well, the NY Times and Washington Post had no problem with publishing the names and pictures (outside of their homes!) despite the very real likelyhood that radical Muslims would target them.

3) Count three is identical to count 2, except it’s for leaking the information to Journalist B (Washington Post).

4) …in a matter within the jurisdiction of the executive branch of the Government of the United States, namely the Publications Review Bard of the CIA, willfully concealed and covered up by trick and scheme a material fact, namely, that, in connection with a manuscript he was seeking to publish, the defendant wa aware that the CIA used a particular classified teechnique in an operation to locate and capture Abu Zubaydah, despite representing falsely to the Publications Review Board that the technique was ficticious.

So…let’s get this straight: Kiriakou revealed the names and identity of covert CIA agents involved in the capture, detention, and interrogation of al Qaeda suspects. He did his damned best to thwart the capture of an enemy of the united states (Zubaydah). And he did this for money and so that he could write a book?

What part of this is not treason? Once found guilty, I hope they line him up against a wall and shoot him until he is dead. He deserves no better than that.

As for the reporters, they then turned around and provided the names and pictures of covert CIA agents the defense attorneys for the terrorists. This makes them equally guilty in my mind, and they should be lined up against that wall along with Kiriakou and shot until they are dead. My disdain and hatred of the the Leftwing media and those who call themselves “journalist” hits another low.

Oh, and Kiriakou went to work for Kerry after he worked for the CIA. As Moe Lane at Red State writes:

John Kerry needs to do better vetting of his staff. Particularly when it comes to this guy: I mean, correct me if I’m wrong, but doesn’t it seem to be a little odd that Kerry would pick as a senior adviser somebody who would think that it’s a good idea to release classified photos and names of CIA operatives to the media? Particularly since both the photos and names ended up on the wrong side of the bars in Gitmo?

Do you have any doubts that he leaked classified information in his position in Kerry’s office, too?

 
AFD Chief Rhoda Mae Kerr

Chief Rhoda Mae Kerr: Diversity more important than quality or qualifications

You can have quality, qualified applicants in public service, or you can have diversity. You can almost never have both, as it’s been proven time-and-again that the bar of enlistment for many jobs has to be lowered significantly in order to “diversify.”

Which has turned government and public employment into the greatest employer of otherwise unqualified minorities (blacks, really) in America.

Story via Ramparts 360:

This story is a great microcosm of liberal governance, foolishness, and its consequences.  I almost don’t know where to begin. This article  about recruiting minorities for the Fire Dept appeared in the Statesman on Nov 1, 2011.

While liberals tell us they hate racism, and liberal Austin city leaders tell us they work to expel racism from city government, that’s not quite true.  Racism against whites is okay.

In the article our fire chief Rhoda Mae Kerr said in regards to a Fire Dept diversity recruitment plan, “Unfortunately, we also had a higher number of (white) applicants.”  It’s unfortunate whites applied to join the Fire Dept?  How can it be unfortunate that a group of people want to pursue a career in protecting our city from fire?  The hostility toward white applicants is stunning, but in Austin its business as usual.

The 2011 recruiting process was intended to increase the percentage of minority applicants to the Fire Dept in the name of diversity – we’ll get to the Fire Chief’s definition of ‘diversity’ later.  While the Fire Dept spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on this recruitment program to attract more minorities, the program was a failure and did not result in an increased proportion of minority applicants than in past years.  One expense alone was $250,000 to a marketing firm.

 

Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) announced today in a touching video that she is resigning from Congress, effective tomorrow, to focus on her recovery.

While I disagree with nearly every political position Gifford holds, I hope her the very best in her continued recovery. She has undoubtedly been an inspiration to many people. But I’m glad she’s out of Congress…her brand of politics are bad for America. Simple as that. And if there’s even a remote chance for a Conservative to win that seat, all the better.

Giffords should have reigned as soon as she become conscious and able to communicate quite some time ago. Her constituents have been without representation for more than a year while she was unable to communicate or do the job she was elected to do. And continued to draw a large paycheck for.

In case you’re wondering about the timing of her resignation, and why she might have waited so long to resign a job for which she was completely incapable of doing…well…she might be an incredible survivor, but she’s still a Democrat at heart. She had to be in office for at least 5 years to get the lifetime pension of $139,200 per year plus COLA, along with the Congress’s health policy. Since she didn’t take office until January, 2007, she had to serve until January, 2012 to meet the lifetime benefits package benchmark.

There are rumors that Giffords’ husband, astronaut Mark Kelly, could declare his candidacy…which enable him to use the $800,000 in campaign funds sitting in his wife’s campaign war chest. I have little doubt he’d win in a runaway, regardless of his qualifications. Because that’s just what we need: another family member who believes they are entitled to “their” family seat.

Meanwhile, Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer will call a special election in April to replace Giffords.

 

Joe PaternoSo…Joe Paterno has died. Apparently from a combination of old age, lung cancer, deep shame, and deserved humiliation.

Yeah, yeah, yeah…we’re not supposed to speak ill of the dead. Whatever. Joe Paterno had the chance…the obligation…to protect innocent children from a known serial child rapist.

And he did nothing. Nothing. Other than try to protect his own legacy and the reputation of his beloved football program.

I could give two-shits about how many football games he won, or how many young mens’ lives he touched. It’s the lives of those young boys who were touched by Jerry Sandusky that matters most.

Over on Twitter, La Shawn Barber summarized it best in three short tweets:

Too bad Joe Paterno’s name will be more associated w/ child rape than “winningest coach.”

Didn’t have to be that way, for him or those preyed-upon children. Soul-deep outrage, moral courage, and an instinct to protect the weak.

All in short supply at Penn State.

Exactly. I hope in the last weeks and days — if not hours — of his life, that Joe found peace and forgiveness.

© 2010 UrbanGrounds

Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha