Search
Home  |   About  |   Q & A  |   Archives  |   Credits  |   Contact  |  
« If Annika has Been Tortured…
Calling a Terrorist a Terrorist »

A Letter to the NY Times

Regarding their latest defamation of US Troops

Dear New York Times,

Please quit calling our female soldiers and interrogators prostitutes. What’s next? Comparing our soldiers to Hitler’s Nazi regime or Pol Pot’s Khmer Rouge? Oh, wait—that’s already happened.

While we thank you for your (self-serving) “support” of our troops, this is the kind of support that we do not want or need. Why? Because it emboldens and delights our enemies, which subsequently puts soldiers’ lives at risk.

The next time you feel like supporting the troops, I would suggest writing a really big check to Soldier’s Angels or Fisher House. Otherwise, keep it to yourself.

When you write and publish your retraction and apology for defaming and endangering US Soldiers, here are some pointers:

  • Do it immediately.
  • Put it on the front page; do not bury it on page 8 of the Lifestyle section.
  • Be sincere.
  • Promise not to do it again, and then keep your word.
  • CC Sen. Dick Durbin and the rest of the Democratic Party leadership.

h/t Michelle Malkin

Posted by Robbie Cooper on Friday, July 15th, 2005 | Trackback |

5 Responses to “A Letter to the NY Times”

Please quit calling our female soldiers and interrogators prostitutes

That’s a creative interpretation of their opinion.

Left by Preston on July 15th, 2005 at 12:07 pm

Oh, sorry Preston. The exact word in the piece was “sex worker”. Maybe that’s what you call the girls working the corner where you live. In my part of the world we call the girls on the corner what they are: prostitutes and hookers.

The point is, the NYTimes is comparing our soldiers and the tactics they are using to get vital information—that will save American’s lives from filthy, murdering terrorists—with the work of hookers.

Left by Robbie on July 15th, 2005 at 12:17 pm

I don’t read the NY Times. It’s not worth the energy I would have to expend.

Left by Trevor on July 15th, 2005 at 7:10 pm

I am sure the NY Times pissed off all women and probably the vocal NOW organization women more than others. I don’t care if they call them prostitutes or sex workers. Hey I wonder what Hillary would say about this?

Left by dianne on July 16th, 2005 at 10:21 am

[...] Is it any wonder that the men and women of our military don’t trust the Drive-by Media? The Al Qaeda Times of New York has repeatedly concocted and printed story-after-story that either slanders our troops, puts them at greater risk by encouraging our enemies, or just flat out making shit up about them. [...]

Left by UrbanGrounds » Blog Archive » New York Times Involved in Mythmaking on October 26th, 2006 at 8:57 pm

Got something you want to say?

Quicktags:


Notes:

You have 10 minutes after you submit your comment to edit it. Simply click the E(dit) link above the countdown-counter at the bottom of your comment. You can only edit a comment from the same IP address from where the original comment was submitted.

If your comment does not appear immediately, it has been sent to the moderation queue for approval.

Your comment either contained more than 2 hyperlinks, or it used a word(s) that are on my Spam blacklist. Comments awaiting moderation will usually be approved within a day.

And, being that it's my blog and all...I reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.