Search

Annika, being the smater-than-most Law student that she is, telegraphed the Democrats’ obstruction strategy within minutes of watching Sen. Schumer and Dick Durbin’s reactions to the announcment:

On CNN, Durbin told Larry King that they intend to be deliberate and they need to ask a bunch of questions, and that they’re entitled to ask Roberts’ opinion on past cases like Roe. At an earlier press conference Schumer said that he voted against Roberts before* because Roberts would not answer certain questions.

So the strategy is to ask questions that the Democrats know a judicial nominee cannot answer according to the rules of judicial ethics, then claim that he’s hiding something. They also plan to drag out the hearings, to enable their operatives to manufacture a “scandal,” their allies in the media to publicize the “scandal,” and the lefty blogs to whip up outrage over the “scandal.”

* Which is misleading, since Roberts was confirmed unanimously. Shumer voted no in committee.

Or, as ProteinWisdom put it:

Durbin and Schumer are already making the kind of whiny noises one expected them to make when Bush didn’t nominate Patricia Ireland.

Actually, PW, I think that Durbin and Schumer would have made the same whiny protestations had Bush nominated Ireland—simply because they oppose everything, no matter what it is, that President Bush supports.

Hell, if President Bush had nominated Dick Durbin, the traitorous-Sen from IL would have spontaneously and instantly opposed his own nomination before he stopped to consider it…it’s a knee jerk reaction; they are helpless to fight their own hate, even when it is for their own good, or—God-forbid—the good of the country.

But the Left will fail. I’ll take any and all bets to the contrary. And John G. Roberts Jr. will be the next Justice on the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS).

4 Responses to “Democrat Strategy Telegraphed”

Is it really ‘whiny’ for the Senate to perform its Constitutionally mandated job? Do you really want a system of judicial appointments with no checks and balances?

There is a difference between the advise and consent role of the Senate described in the Constitution and being a whiny osbtructionist.

The Dems plan on using the later interpretation.

Describe the difference using value-neutral words.

Because I watched the May 1, 2003 Senate confirmation hearing of John G. Roberts Jr.

And I listened to the petty and lame questions that Sen. Shumer asked then. How lame and petty were they? So much so, that Orrin Hatch had this to say:

In the beginning of Wednesday’s Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing for Bush nominee John G. Roberts Jr. Chairman Orrin Hatch praised Democrat Sen. Charles Schumer of New York for asking “intelligent” questions, but then Hatch switched gears.

“Some [of his questions] I totally disagree with,” Hatch of Utah said. “Some I think are dumbass questions, between you and me. I am not kidding you. I mean, as much as I love and respect you, I just think that’s true.”

A stunned Schumer asked if he heard the chairman correctly, to which Hatch said yes. Again, Schumer asked Hatch if he would like to “revise and extend his remark,” congressional speak for change his mind.

A former trial attorney, Hatch replied: “No, I am going to keep it exactly the way it is. I mean, I hate to say it. I mean, I feel badly saying it between you and me. But I do know dumbass questions when I see dumbass questions.”

Got something you want to say?

Quicktags:


Notes:

You have 10 minutes after you submit your comment to edit it. Simply click the E(dit) link above the countdown-counter at the bottom of your comment. You can only edit a comment from the same IP address from where the original comment was submitted.

If your comment does not appear immediately, it has been sent to the moderation queue for approval.

Your comment either contained more than 2 hyperlinks, or it used a word(s) that are on my Spam blacklist. Comments awaiting moderation will usually be approved within a day.

And, being that it's my blog and all...I reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.