Yesterday evening, Robert Alan Shields (30) was the 12th prisoner executed in Texas this year.
From the Houston Chronicle:
A Galveston County jury condemned him for the killing of Paula Stiner, 27, who had been repeatedly stabbed with a knife from her own kitchen and beaten with a hammer when she was found by her husband as he returned home from work Sept. 21, 1994.
And on what grounds would Shield’s defense lawyer use to postpone his execution for the last 11 years?
Appeals lawyers contended that Shields was trying to defend himself and never intended to kill Stiner, that the self-defense argument never was pursued by his attorneys at trial and that the U.S. Supreme Court should allow him another chance to prove his innocence.
Self-defense? Let’s see…after beating her with the hammer, he stabbed her 28 times. And, then stole her credit cards and her car? And self-defense is the best that his defense could come up with. Shields should have argued ineffective counsel—which is more believable in this case than “self-defense”.
***
Next on the schedule is Francis Newton, who is scheduled for execution on Sept 14 for shooting her husband, her 7-year old son, and her 21-month old daughter to death in 1988.
Why’d Francis kill her family? For the insurance money.
Francis will be the first woman executed in Texas this year, and the first since the execution of Betty Lou Beets on 02/24/2000, and only the second since Karla Faye Tucker was executed in 1998.
Francis is one of 9 women currently on death row in Texas.





His atty was arguing that his trial attys were ineffective in that they did not argue self defense therefore Shields did not have the requisite intent for first degree murder.
It assumes that Shields told his trial attys it was in self-defense. And if he did, it also assumes the trial attys didn’t make a tactical decision to not use it because they didn’t believe the jury would be swayed by such an argument and instead would be more likely to vote death. Appellate courts will not second guess tactical decisions by trial attys where on its face such a tactic, like here, wd be reasonable.
As to be expected, he lied and refused to take responsibility to the very end:
Left by 2 on August 24th, 2005 at 4:16 pm