Comments on: Spinning Ronnie Earle

By: dianne

dianne — Fri, 30 Sep 2005 20:35:53 +0000

Seems to me Ronnie is more interested in immortalizing himself on the big screen than anything else.
http://www.nationalreview.com/york/york200509291814.asp

By: Preston

Preston — Thu, 29 Sep 2005 21:05:14 +0000

The fact that Ken Starr attacked Bill Clinton so vigorously must mean he’s a Democrat.

Sorry, Robbie, your rebuttals are pretty unconvincing. Occam’s Razor suggests that Earle conducts investigations of political figures on a non-partisan basis.

By: David

David — Thu, 29 Sep 2005 18:52:11 +0000

So let’s get this straight…

Prosecuting “four times as many” Dems as Reps only proves Dems are more corrupt, and that people Earle has worked with were Reps only proves that he “disgusted” them into running as Reps?

Good lord, how much “kool aid” must one swallow to come up with, much believe, this kind of stuff.

Let me guess, Ken Starr was a great American, and the Whitewater investigation was not a partisan withhunt. No need to answer.