<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet Jihad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://urbangrounds.com/2006/04/internet-jihad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2006/04/internet-jihad/</link>
	<description>Sometimes the truth hurts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:48:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2006/04/internet-jihad/#comment-170807</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/?p=825#comment-170807</guid>
		<description>
                                        </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2006/04/internet-jihad/#comment-170806</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/?p=825#comment-170806</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2006/04/internet-jihad/#comment-16748</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 15:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/?p=825#comment-16748</guid>
		<description>Well, my longer post on the logical fallacies in this post disappeared.

So I&#039;ll just post this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guilt_by_association

The classic example:
Adolf Hitler was a vegetarian. Vegetarianism must be evil. 

Today&#039;s example:
Terrorists hate conservative blogs therefore conservative blogs must be right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, my longer post on the logical fallacies in this post disappeared.</p>
<p>So I&#8217;ll just post this:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guilt_by_association" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guilt_by_association</a></p>
<p>The classic example:<br />
Adolf Hitler was a vegetarian. Vegetarianism must be evil. </p>
<p>Today&#8217;s example:<br />
Terrorists hate conservative blogs therefore conservative blogs must be right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2006/04/internet-jihad/#comment-16746</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 14:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/?p=825#comment-16746</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Do neither of you think itâ€™s telling that there have been zero DOS attacks on Liberal web sites and blogs? Do you think it merely coincidence?&lt;/i&gt;

Do you really believe this?  

First of all, who said there were no attacks on liberal web sites?
Who said there were no attacks on non-political web sites?

As I mentioned before you have &lt;strong&gt;no idea&lt;/strong&gt; about who is doing this or of their motivations so it is ridiculous to take pride in their animosity.

Even accepting all of your premises about the DOS attack it does not follow that the course of action that makes our enemies the angriest is the wise course.  We could have bombed the shit out of Moscow and Beijing during the cold war: they would have &lt;strong&gt;hated&lt;/strong&gt; that but it doesn&#039;t mean it would have increased our ability to win that conflict.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Do neither of you think itâ€™s telling that there have been zero DOS attacks on Liberal web sites and blogs? Do you think it merely coincidence?</i></p>
<p>Do you really believe this?  </p>
<p>First of all, who said there were no attacks on liberal web sites?<br />
Who said there were no attacks on non-political web sites?</p>
<p>As I mentioned before you have <strong>no idea</strong> about who is doing this or of their motivations so it is ridiculous to take pride in their animosity.</p>
<p>Even accepting all of your premises about the DOS attack it does not follow that the course of action that makes our enemies the angriest is the wise course.  We could have bombed the shit out of Moscow and Beijing during the cold war: they would have <strong>hated</strong> that but it doesn&#8217;t mean it would have increased our ability to win that conflict.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robbie</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2006/04/internet-jihad/#comment-16744</link>
		<dc:creator>Robbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 12:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/?p=825#comment-16744</guid>
		<description>Do neither of you think it&#039;s telling that there have been zero DOS attacks on Liberal web sites and blogs? Do you think it merely coincidence?

Liberal bloggers  don&#039;t believe that they are on the same side as the terrorists (nor do I, for the most part and with exceptions), but the terrorists sure do believe that they are on the same side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do neither of you think it&#8217;s telling that there have been zero DOS attacks on Liberal web sites and blogs? Do you think it merely coincidence?</p>
<p>Liberal bloggers  don&#8217;t believe that they are on the same side as the terrorists (nor do I, for the most part and with exceptions), but the terrorists sure do believe that they are on the same side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2006/04/internet-jihad/#comment-16743</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 12:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/?p=825#comment-16743</guid>
		<description>This may be the funniest example of right-wing blogger idiocy I&#039;ve seen in a long time.  &quot;If you haven&#039;t pissed off people enough to make them attack you, you should question your worth.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may be the funniest example of right-wing blogger idiocy I&#8217;ve seen in a long time.  &#8220;If you haven&#8217;t pissed off people enough to make them attack you, you should question your worth.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2006/04/internet-jihad/#comment-16736</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2006 22:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/?p=825#comment-16736</guid>
		<description>Wow that&#039;s quite a jump!

You take the DOS attacks from unknown parties for unknown reasons as a justification of your entire worldview?  

That&#039;s a  little self-congratulatory on the part of Ms. Blonde Sacacity in my opinion.

The logical gaps are too numerous to bother to get into.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow that&#8217;s quite a jump!</p>
<p>You take the DOS attacks from unknown parties for unknown reasons as a justification of your entire worldview?  </p>
<p>That&#8217;s a  little self-congratulatory on the part of Ms. Blonde Sacacity in my opinion.</p>
<p>The logical gaps are too numerous to bother to get into.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nielsen BuzzMetrics' BlogPulse Newswire</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2006/04/internet-jihad/#comment-22678</link>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen BuzzMetrics' BlogPulse Newswire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/?p=825#comment-22678</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;are recovering from a weekend denial-of-service attack that they claim was launched from computers somewhere in Saudi Arabia. The blogger at Urban Grounds has some pithy commentary on what&#039;s being calledInternet Jihad. Really? Other curious discoveries in the blogosphere today...Daily Kos is hinting at a lobbyist-inspired sex ring in D.C.? MSNBC has some emerging scuttlebutt on the same issue. The Boston Globe&#039;s piece about&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->are recovering from a weekend denial-of-service attack that they claim was launched from computers somewhere in Saudi Arabia. The blogger at Urban Grounds has some pithy commentary on what&#8217;s being calledInternet Jihad. Really? Other curious discoveries in the blogosphere today&#8230;Daily Kos is hinting at a lobbyist-inspired sex ring in D.C.? MSNBC has some emerging scuttlebutt on the same issue. The Boston Globe&#8217;s piece about<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aaron's cc: The MoHamster Dance</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2006/04/internet-jihad/#comment-23154</link>
		<dc:creator>aaron's cc: The MoHamster Dance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/?p=825#comment-23154</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;Technorati Tags: dos, ddos, cyberattack, cyberjihad, jihad, islam, muslim, saudi, internet jihad, saudi arabia, islamic, fatwa, hack attack, terror, terrorist, terrorism, first amendment, hackers, cartoons&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->Technorati Tags: dos, ddos, cyberattack, cyberjihad, jihad, islam, muslim, saudi, internet jihad, saudi arabia, islamic, fatwa, hack attack, terror, terrorist, terrorism, first amendment, hackers, cartoons<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

