Supporting Israel and disproportionate responses
One of my readers, Preston, asked me (in this post) to explain my support of the Dan Halutz quote featured at the top of my sidebar:
So, here you go:
____________________________________________
- I believe that a country has a right to defend itself and its citizens — not only from attacks, but to prevent attacks.
- I believe that — when responding to threats or attacks against it — a country should respond, not proportionately, but by an order of magnitude greater than the initial threat/attack.
- I believe that the retaliation should be so severe as to punish the enemy while minimizing their ability for future attacks, but also to serve as a deterrent to future attackers.
- I believe that Lebanon is complicit in the actions of Hezbillah. Just because Lebanon denounces those actions now, doesn’t mean that they didn’t facilitate Hezbollah’s initial ability to launch attacks from within her borders.
Lebanon is not without fault or blame for hosting and providing safe harbor for the Hezbollah terrorist organization. At the very least, Lebanon was a willing pawn for Hezbollah.
I support Israel’s attempt to turn back the clocks by 20 years in Lebanon to show other nations the high cost of hosting and sponsoring terrorists groups. If you provide a safe harbor for terrorists, then you will and should be bombed back to the stone ages.






1. I agree with that.
2. Proportionality does not refer to responding decisively. The critique on the proportionality of the response refers to the fact that so many civilians are being killed by Israeli actions than are threatened.
3. Agreed
4. Debatable. I’m glad you’ll never be my oncologist. It is inarguable that the body-politic of Lebanon had a cancer. Well, Israel’s treatment is in danger of killing the patient.
Less metaphorically: there were many Lebanonese who would have cheered Hezbollah’s reduction of influence in Lebanon. I suspect those people are more concerned with Israel bombing their homes at this point.
The question for me isn’t even ethics as much as strategy. Israel seems to be persuing an ineffective and unsustainable strategy (unless they intend to occupy Lebanon for another 18 years…)
Left by Preston on July 26th, 2006 at 3:02 pm