<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2006 World Series of Poker Blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://urbangrounds.com/2006/08/wsop-2006/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2006/08/wsop-2006/</link>
	<description>Sometimes the truth hurts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:29:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fossum</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2006/08/wsop-2006/#comment-135691</link>
		<dc:creator>Fossum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 14:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2006/08/01/wsop-2006/#comment-135691</guid>
		<description>Ok,
I took first in Game 5 and there was some controversy for second place and we need some help.

Steve was all in with 44 chips
Jason was all in with 44 chips
Tabatt was all in with 36 chips

So that&#039;s 36 chips between the three of us and 16 chips between Jason and Steve.

Steve&#039;s hand beat Jason and Tabatt
Tabatt&#039;s hand beat Jason&#039;s

Jason argued that since he had more chips in, and that Tabatt was out first with less chips, then Jason took second place.
I argued that since both Jason and Tabatt had zero chips (because I took them all) that Tabatt took second place because he had the next best hand.

Here is the question:  Who takes second?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok,<br />
I took first in Game 5 and there was some controversy for second place and we need some help.</p>
<p>Steve was all in with 44 chips<br />
Jason was all in with 44 chips<br />
Tabatt was all in with 36 chips</p>
<p>So that&#8217;s 36 chips between the three of us and 16 chips between Jason and Steve.</p>
<p>Steve&#8217;s hand beat Jason and Tabatt<br />
Tabatt&#8217;s hand beat Jason&#8217;s</p>
<p>Jason argued that since he had more chips in, and that Tabatt was out first with less chips, then Jason took second place.<br />
I argued that since both Jason and Tabatt had zero chips (because I took them all) that Tabatt took second place because he had the next best hand.</p>
<p>Here is the question:  Who takes second?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

