Three Indonesian Christians have been sentenced to death for inciting attacks on Muslims in 2000.
Sentenced to death. For inciting attacks. On Muslims.
I wonder what the penalty is for actual attacks by Muslims (such as beheadings and stoning to death) against Christians? Oh, that’s right…nothing. It’s actually encouraged in Indonesia.
If those Christians are actually put to death for “inciting attacks” against Muslims, than British authorities should arrest and summarily execute Sheikh Omar Bakri Mohammed who is attempting to incite violence against the Pope (he’s urging fellow Muslims to kill the Pope — for having the temerity to point out the violent nature of Islam).
________________
Michell Malkin has quite a few posts about Muslim violence against Christians in Indonesia.
This is outrageous! Good thing we have the moral high ground. American under Bush would never imprison accused terrorists without a fair trial, we would never torture, we would never kill innocent people. Oh, wait …
You’re an idiot Brian.
Accused (and actual) terrorists do not have a right to a trial (fair or otherwise). Sleep deprivation, standing for prolonged periods of time, and being forced to listen to the Red Hot Chili Peppers at high volumes is not torture (although the RHCP music is borderline torture).
Killing innocent people? Are you implying that our military has intentionally targeted innocent civilians for random executions? Nice support there, Leftard. There are collateral damages (the loss of civilian life) in all wars. There is even more when our enemy (though you might consider the jihadist your buddies) hides amongst population centers and uses women and children as shields.
But still, I give you credit for sticking to the Lefty “moral equivalency” game plan though…don’t you dare blame or condemn the Muslims for their insane and barberous acts of terror…rather blame the US and cast aspersions on our brave men and women in the Military.
You’re a fucking coward and if you’re hair was on fire, I’d piss on your leg.
Robbie,
Keep talking. Forced standing in one position isn’t torture? Tell that to survivors of the Gulag.
I think your last comment says it all: “if you’re hair was on fire, I’d piss on your leg.” Yeah, I want to listen to you for moral advice.
Oh yeah, and “Accussed (and actual) terrorists do not have a right to a trial (fair or otherwise).” Then why the concern with the accused terrorists in Indonesia? Could it be h y p o c r i s y?
Why is it that the Left always wants to compare our troops to Nazis? And you wonder why Soldiers hate the Left so much (despite your hypocrital chants of “we support the troops…but”)?
Nazis? What the hell are you talking about? I guess I should move on … you don’t seem to have the intellectual power necessary for a nice debate.
I guess “Exocutions” and “Accussed” should have been my tip off. Why don’t you google Gulag before making a fool of yourself.
Oh, before I go … the troops I know don’t like Mr. Rumsfeld or his insane support of torture.
Well Brian, thank God there are better and braver men than yourself willing to stand in defense of you and your idiocy despite the fact that you despise and ridicule them (albeit not to their face, cowards like you never do).
C Co, 4th Landing Support Battalion – First Gulf War. Something tells me you’re not a veteran. A vet can tell.
Later ’stro boy.
F Co. 701st MSB, 1St ID — Bosnia and First Gulf War. An old veteran Combat Medic (91B) can always spot a dishonorably discharged vet.
Ad hominem attack.
Ad hominem attack.
Hypocrite.