<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Media Bias? Part V</title>
	<atom:link href="http://urbangrounds.com/2006/10/what-media-bias/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2006/10/what-media-bias/</link>
	<description>Off-the-cuff commentary on the day&#039;s events</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:15:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Preston</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2006/10/what-media-bias/#comment-26706</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2006/10/25/what-media-bias/#comment-26706</guid>
		<description>Have you ever read the Note?  To call Mark Halprin left-wing is laughable.  He is a tool- usually for Republicans but almost always for entrenched power.   In any case you don&#039;t often hear liberals writing lines like: &lt;em&gt;How the (liberal) Old Media plans to cover the last two weeks of the election: &lt;/em&gt;

On &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/10/25/0748/6332&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;O&#039;reilly&lt;/a&gt;, Halprin gave this weird suggestion that the media was going to behave exactly the opposite of the satire that he wrote in the Note: to balance the bad news for the Republicans- Iraq, Katrina, North Korea, Foley (basically their entire agenda)- that the media needed to bend over backwards in the last two weeks.   

I don&#039;t know if he was just kissing O&#039;reilly&#039;s right wing ass but it is a grossly inappropriate statement for a &#039;journalist&#039; to make.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever read the Note?  To call Mark Halprin left-wing is laughable.  He is a tool- usually for Republicans but almost always for entrenched power.   In any case you don&#8217;t often hear liberals writing lines like: <em>How the (liberal) Old Media plans to cover the last two weeks of the election: </em></p>
<p>On <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/10/25/0748/6332" rel="nofollow">O&#8217;reilly</a>, Halprin gave this weird suggestion that the media was going to behave exactly the opposite of the satire that he wrote in the Note: to balance the bad news for the Republicans- Iraq, Katrina, North Korea, Foley (basically their entire agenda)- that the media needed to bend over backwards in the last two weeks.   </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if he was just kissing O&#8217;reilly&#8217;s right wing ass but it is a grossly inappropriate statement for a &#8216;journalist&#8217; to make.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
