Search

No learjets were used to get participants to the awards?

I read that Leonardo De Caprio, with Al Gore by his side, proudly proclaimed that the Oscars — for the first time evah! — have gone Green.

I take it that means:

  • All Oscar attendees and invitees who live in the Los Angeles area either walked or rode their bicycles to the event.
  • Not a single one of them flew on a private jet to get to Los Angeles.
  • All gowns and tuxedos were made from non-synthetic, all-natural fibers that were grown using completely organic methods, harvested by highly-paid (and unionized) workers, and sewn by certified “no children work here” garment shops.
  • The entire theatre was updated to run on nothing but solar and/or nuclear power. They didn’t even turn the air conditioning on for the entire event.
  • Michael Moore was not permitted to speak, thus unleashing more hotair into the atmosphere than all the jets used by the attending audience combined.

Since none of the above it true, I’m more than a little sick of millionaire actors who are more guilty of conspicuous consumption than anybody else on the planet (save for maybe pre-invasion Saddam Hussein in his golden palaces) preaching to me about “making sacrifices” and “cutting back”.

And then they leave the red carpet in their plug-in hybrid, drive a few blocks before transferring to their H2 Limo, and then flying off in their Citation Excel private jet to their 28,000 square foot, fully air-conditioned beach-side condos.

And if I hear about another gazillionaire living a “carbon neuteral” lifestyle because they’ve purchased “carbon credits”, I’m going to go start my Land Rover and let it just idle through two or three tanks of gas in protest of their bullshit.

If those Hollywood blowhards were honest and sincere about hosting a “green awards” ceremony, they could have just announced the winners via email. Or maybe they could have set up a chat room on Yahoo.

Or just canceled the entire charade.

5 Responses to “Were the Oscars Really “Green”?”

Boy, the song “An Inconvenient Truth” ranks right up there with “It’s Hard to be a Pimp.” What are these bozos thinking?

It’s fair to ask the question- particularly since they hyped the idea.

However, the point of environmental activism isn’t to live an ascetic lifestyle but to simply not to ruin the planet for the people who will live here after us. The environmentalist call for reduced pollution and consumption of limited resouces isn’t intended to hector you into avoiding all pleasure but to produce systemic change at the governmental level. Individual conservation is personally admirable but does nothing to change the impact on the environment: my reduced fossil fuel usage reduces the price spurring more usage from someone else.

“produce systemic change at the government level”

That’s what it’s ALL about with the Democrats.

We’re such sheep.

Heh. Well said!

Green, indeed.

Dianne- would you agree that it’s desirable to reduce US dependence on imported oil? Do you know the most effective measure taken in the last 30 years in this area: CAFE standards set by the US government.

Wishful thinking won’t make it happen.

Got something you want to say?

Quicktags:


Notes:

You have 10 minutes after you submit your comment to edit it. Simply click the E(dit) link above the countdown-counter at the bottom of your comment. You can only edit a comment from the same IP address from where the original comment was submitted.

If your comment does not appear immediately, it has been sent to the moderation queue for approval.

Your comment either contained more than 2 hyperlinks, or it used a word(s) that are on my Spam blacklist. Comments awaiting moderation will usually be approved within a day.

And, being that it's my blog and all...I reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.