<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CBC: FOX News Did a &#8220;Great Job&#8221; in 2004 Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://urbangrounds.com/2007/04/cbc-and-fox-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2007/04/cbc-and-fox-news/</link>
	<description>Sometimes the truth hurts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:04:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: National Cable Network</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2007/04/cbc-and-fox-news/#comment-130357</link>
		<dc:creator>National Cable Network</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 06:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2007/04/26/cbc-and-fox-news/#comment-130357</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Common Mistakes When Building Network Cables...&lt;/strong&gt;

When building network cables people often get confused about what&#039;s important. It&#039;s not hard to see why though. With the money spent in marketing the cable industry most manufacturers want you to think that one particular quality or another that they...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Common Mistakes When Building Network Cables&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>When building network cables people often get confused about what&#8217;s important. It&#8217;s not hard to see why though. With the money spent in marketing the cable industry most manufacturers want you to think that one particular quality or another that they&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dianne</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2007/04/cbc-and-fox-news/#comment-64215</link>
		<dc:creator>dianne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2007/04/26/cbc-and-fox-news/#comment-64215</guid>
		<description>And, then there&#039;s this.  I hope it plays.  If not, go to Drudge.  This was purposefully done by Matthews on MSNBC to race bait.  You can see how Elizabeth Edwards tried to defer it, but he wouldn&#039;t let her.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbnH0cYHOcY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, then there&#8217;s this.  I hope it plays.  If not, go to Drudge.  This was purposefully done by Matthews on MSNBC to race bait.  You can see how Elizabeth Edwards tried to defer it, but he wouldn&#8217;t let her.<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbnH0cYHOcY" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbnH0cYHOcY</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dianne</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2007/04/cbc-and-fox-news/#comment-64208</link>
		<dc:creator>dianne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2007/04/26/cbc-and-fox-news/#comment-64208</guid>
		<description>I think John Jarzemsky has been taking hate mongering lessons from the likes of Al Sharpton.  

This is really sad. I&#039;m not classifying all democrats in this mold, but I will say that there are some who want to keep them &quot;on the plantation&quot; so they can make an example of them. It&#039;s the worst kind of hypocrisy.  Rather than address the problems and try to find answers and help, they take every opportunity to race bait and I, for one, am sick of it. I know several black people who have risen above that and are trying to make a difference. People like Peterson and LaShawn Barber.

And, don&#039;t even dare to call me racist. I have a biracial grandddaughter who I would defend with my life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think John Jarzemsky has been taking hate mongering lessons from the likes of Al Sharpton.  </p>
<p>This is really sad. I&#8217;m not classifying all democrats in this mold, but I will say that there are some who want to keep them &#8220;on the plantation&#8221; so they can make an example of them. It&#8217;s the worst kind of hypocrisy.  Rather than address the problems and try to find answers and help, they take every opportunity to race bait and I, for one, am sick of it. I know several black people who have risen above that and are trying to make a difference. People like Peterson and LaShawn Barber.</p>
<p>And, don&#8217;t even dare to call me racist. I have a biracial grandddaughter who I would defend with my life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Jarzemsky</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2007/04/cbc-and-fox-news/#comment-64204</link>
		<dc:creator>John Jarzemsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2007/04/26/cbc-and-fox-news/#comment-64204</guid>
		<description>Anyone who identifies Fox News as anything less than the hate-mongering, propaganda-spewing, yellow-journalism factory it is needs to consult a mental health professional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who identifies Fox News as anything less than the hate-mongering, propaganda-spewing, yellow-journalism factory it is needs to consult a mental health professional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robbie</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2007/04/cbc-and-fox-news/#comment-64194</link>
		<dc:creator>Robbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2007/04/26/cbc-and-fox-news/#comment-64194</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry Adam...I&#039;m trying not to laugh at you...seriously, I&#039;m trying not to. But you make it so. damn. hard. not to.

That 3 minute loop of out takes from years of Fox News footage is your &quot;proof&quot; that Fox News is &quot;clearly not a credible news source&quot;?

Wait. I&#039;m going to stop laughing before I proceed. 

Whew. Ok. All better now.

hahahahah. 

Sorry, I thought I was done.

_______________________

Because Fox News has the temerity to criticize the negative elements of black culture, and to call the hate-mongering race hustlers (Jesse Jackson and Big Al Sharpton) out for being, well, hate-mongering race hustlers --- that makes them a &quot;racist&quot; and &quot;non-credible&quot; news source?

Puuuuhhhhleeasse.

Do you even know who James Myart is? Sean Hannity was right on the money for saying that Myart is  a national disgrace. Hell, I called Myart out on &lt;a href=&quot;http://urbangrounds.com/2006/04/06/james-myart-is-black/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this blog&lt;/a&gt; for being a race hustler.

Just because Fox News won&#039;t jump on the plow and bury &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2007/4/24/164012.shtml?s=os&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;our men in the military&lt;/a&gt; at the drop of a dime (with little to no actual facts or real reporting), or bury some rich white kids who were framed by some black stripper, doesn&#039;t make them &quot;non-credible&quot;, it means that there is more than one side to any story. Hell, often there is more than &quot;one story&quot;. 

And Fox News more often than the other outlets take the side of not slandering our troops, or of actually reporting on the corruption flowing out of the Democratic party (since other outlets won&#039;t cover it).

Bottom line? Fox News reports on news that damages the left and their message. It&#039;s not &quot;biased&quot; to say that Rep. William Jefferson is a crook who should be ousted from office. It&#039;s not &quot;biased&quot; to say that sen. Byrd is disassociated from reality and that he is the undisputed King of Pork. It&#039;s not biased to say that Rep. Murtha is a dishonest goon known primarily for his propencity for back room deals.

It&#039;s not biased to report on the good our troops our doing in Iraq and Afghanistan, or to report on their successes. And the fact that Fox News doesn&#039;t gleefully &quot;report&quot; and paint our troops as civilian murdering, rampant raping, and mindless torturing baffoons, doesn&#039;t make them &quot;biased&quot;.

It just makes them &quot;not Liberally biased&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry Adam&#8230;I&#8217;m trying not to laugh at you&#8230;seriously, I&#8217;m trying not to. But you make it so. damn. hard. not to.</p>
<p>That 3 minute loop of out takes from years of Fox News footage is your &#8220;proof&#8221; that Fox News is &#8220;clearly not a credible news source&#8221;?</p>
<p>Wait. I&#8217;m going to stop laughing before I proceed. </p>
<p>Whew. Ok. All better now.</p>
<p>hahahahah. </p>
<p>Sorry, I thought I was done.</p>
<p>_______________________</p>
<p>Because Fox News has the temerity to criticize the negative elements of black culture, and to call the hate-mongering race hustlers (Jesse Jackson and Big Al Sharpton) out for being, well, hate-mongering race hustlers &#8212; that makes them a &#8220;racist&#8221; and &#8220;non-credible&#8221; news source?</p>
<p>Puuuuhhhhleeasse.</p>
<p>Do you even know who James Myart is? Sean Hannity was right on the money for saying that Myart is  a national disgrace. Hell, I called Myart out on <a href="http://urbangrounds.com/2006/04/06/james-myart-is-black/" rel="nofollow">this blog</a> for being a race hustler.</p>
<p>Just because Fox News won&#8217;t jump on the plow and bury <a href="http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2007/4/24/164012.shtml?s=os" rel="nofollow">our men in the military</a> at the drop of a dime (with little to no actual facts or real reporting), or bury some rich white kids who were framed by some black stripper, doesn&#8217;t make them &#8220;non-credible&#8221;, it means that there is more than one side to any story. Hell, often there is more than &#8220;one story&#8221;. </p>
<p>And Fox News more often than the other outlets take the side of not slandering our troops, or of actually reporting on the corruption flowing out of the Democratic party (since other outlets won&#8217;t cover it).</p>
<p>Bottom line? Fox News reports on news that damages the left and their message. It&#8217;s not &#8220;biased&#8221; to say that Rep. William Jefferson is a crook who should be ousted from office. It&#8217;s not &#8220;biased&#8221; to say that sen. Byrd is disassociated from reality and that he is the undisputed King of Pork. It&#8217;s not biased to say that Rep. Murtha is a dishonest goon known primarily for his propencity for back room deals.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not biased to report on the good our troops our doing in Iraq and Afghanistan, or to report on their successes. And the fact that Fox News doesn&#8217;t gleefully &#8220;report&#8221; and paint our troops as civilian murdering, rampant raping, and mindless torturing baffoons, doesn&#8217;t make them &#8220;biased&#8221;.</p>
<p>It just makes them &#8220;not Liberally biased&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kma</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2007/04/cbc-and-fox-news/#comment-64189</link>
		<dc:creator>kma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2007/04/26/cbc-and-fox-news/#comment-64189</guid>
		<description>And if only CBS, NBC, ABC, PBS, CNN, MSNBC, NPR would come out and say they are merely DNC  mouthpieces. Worse, they represent more and more the most extremist minority of the democratic party. 

&lt;em&gt;Also, MoveOn is not â€œbig-money bossesâ€ - thatâ€™s absurd.&lt;/em&gt;

No, what&#039;s absurd is you pretending that MoveOn is not a &quot;big money bosses&quot; aka, George Soros, funded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if only CBS, NBC, ABC, PBS, CNN, MSNBC, NPR would come out and say they are merely DNC  mouthpieces. Worse, they represent more and more the most extremist minority of the democratic party. </p>
<p><em>Also, MoveOn is not â€œbig-money bossesâ€ &#8211; thatâ€™s absurd.</em></p>
<p>No, what&#8217;s absurd is you pretending that MoveOn is not a &#8220;big money bosses&#8221; aka, George Soros, funded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdamGreen</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2007/04/cbc-and-fox-news/#comment-64187</link>
		<dc:creator>AdamGreen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2007/04/26/cbc-and-fox-news/#comment-64187</guid>
		<description>Your premise is completely wrong.  The issue in the fox debate controversy is not whether Democrats should go on Fox - the sole issue is whether Democrats should use the unique occassion of a debate to prop Fox up on stage as a neutral and credible news source when they clearly are not.  Fox would just use that credibility to elevate misinformation into the news cycle down the road.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0307/3234.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Paul Begala&lt;/a&gt; summed it up:

The more Fox is seen as &quot;fair and balanced,&quot; the easier it is for the network to swift-boat Democratic candidates and propel misinformation into the mainstream media. Thank God Democrats are finally growing a spine and fighting back. No longer can Fox function as a Republican mouthpiece and expect us to put it on stage as a neutral news source.

To be clear, this is not a boycott, and it&#039;s not about Democrats being afraid to go on Fox. It&#039;s about how Fox is presented to the public when it voices its right-wing views. During the fight against Fox in Nevada, MoveOn suggested a co-sponsored Fox/Air America debate. Perfect. An avowedly progressive media outlet paired with the conservative Fox. The spirit of &quot;Crossfire&quot; lives. But MoveOn&#039;s compromise was not accepted, and ultimately Fox lost everything. 
--------------------------------------------------------
For those who have any doubt about Fox&#039;s partisan Republican agenda, see the hugely viral YouTube videos at www.FoxAttacks.com 

Also, MoveOn is not &quot;big-money bosses&quot; - that&#039;s absurd. It&#039;s 3.2 million members who give average contributions of $50.  If you&#039;re going to use Republican talking points, you have to fact check them first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your premise is completely wrong.  The issue in the fox debate controversy is not whether Democrats should go on Fox &#8211; the sole issue is whether Democrats should use the unique occassion of a debate to prop Fox up on stage as a neutral and credible news source when they clearly are not.  Fox would just use that credibility to elevate misinformation into the news cycle down the road.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0307/3234.html" rel="nofollow">Paul Begala</a> summed it up:</p>
<p>The more Fox is seen as &#8220;fair and balanced,&#8221; the easier it is for the network to swift-boat Democratic candidates and propel misinformation into the mainstream media. Thank God Democrats are finally growing a spine and fighting back. No longer can Fox function as a Republican mouthpiece and expect us to put it on stage as a neutral news source.</p>
<p>To be clear, this is not a boycott, and it&#8217;s not about Democrats being afraid to go on Fox. It&#8217;s about how Fox is presented to the public when it voices its right-wing views. During the fight against Fox in Nevada, MoveOn suggested a co-sponsored Fox/Air America debate. Perfect. An avowedly progressive media outlet paired with the conservative Fox. The spirit of &#8220;Crossfire&#8221; lives. But MoveOn&#8217;s compromise was not accepted, and ultimately Fox lost everything.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
For those who have any doubt about Fox&#8217;s partisan Republican agenda, see the hugely viral YouTube videos at <a href="http://www.FoxAttacks.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.FoxAttacks.com</a> </p>
<p>Also, MoveOn is not &#8220;big-money bosses&#8221; &#8211; that&#8217;s absurd. It&#8217;s 3.2 million members who give average contributions of $50.  If you&#8217;re going to use Republican talking points, you have to fact check them first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2007/04/cbc-and-fox-news/#comment-64179</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2007/04/26/cbc-and-fox-news/#comment-64179</guid>
		<description>You know- if Fox News would just come out and say that they are a Republican mouthpiece I could imagine Democrats having a debate hosted by the channel.  But as it is, the presence of the Democratic Presidential contenders only serves to put a veneer of neutrality on a very partisan source of information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know- if Fox News would just come out and say that they are a Republican mouthpiece I could imagine Democrats having a debate hosted by the channel.  But as it is, the presence of the Democratic Presidential contenders only serves to put a veneer of neutrality on a very partisan source of information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2007/04/cbc-and-fox-news/#comment-64176</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2007/04/26/cbc-and-fox-news/#comment-64176</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Trying to de-legitimitize voices of opposition is a dangerous and slippery slope. &lt;/em&gt;

Um- a legitimate news channel should not be considered a &#039;voice of opposition&#039; to the Democratic Party.  The fact that Fox News can be considered so is exactly the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Trying to de-legitimitize voices of opposition is a dangerous and slippery slope. </em></p>
<p>Um- a legitimate news channel should not be considered a &#8216;voice of opposition&#8217; to the Democratic Party.  The fact that Fox News can be considered so is exactly the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dianne</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2007/04/cbc-and-fox-news/#comment-64169</link>
		<dc:creator>dianne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2007/04/26/cbc-and-fox-news/#comment-64169</guid>
		<description>Hey, I&#039;m a conservative and former Republican (now an Independent) and watch MSN  about as much as FOX.  I usually go by the hosts and the type of material they have...whether it&#039;s interesting or not.  For news, I usually watch ABC because I really like Charlie Gibson.  I think I&#039;m pretty typical. 

There&#039;s a hit job out on Fox by the far left and everybody knows it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I&#8217;m a conservative and former Republican (now an Independent) and watch MSN  about as much as FOX.  I usually go by the hosts and the type of material they have&#8230;whether it&#8217;s interesting or not.  For news, I usually watch ABC because I really like Charlie Gibson.  I think I&#8217;m pretty typical. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s a hit job out on Fox by the far left and everybody knows it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

