// you’re reading...

Election 2008

President Bush’s Shamnesty Plan Passes First Hurdle

It’s time to rid the GOP of the “Kennedy Republicans”

Even President Bush finally slipped and admitted what this Immigration Bill really is: amnesty.

And now a Congress that has a historically-low (and falling) 14% approval rating has voted for a bill that only 22% of American voters approve of.

And now Shamnesty has prevailed, 64-35. Michelle Malkin has a roll call of the Yays and the Nays.

Thankfully my two Senators, Hutchinson and Cornyn, voted like I asked them to during repeated emails and phone calls this week.

________

The President and 64 Senators, including a new faction of the GOP called the Kennedy Republicansâ„¢, have decided to completely ignore the wishes of the people and have told us all to collectively go fuck ourselves.

I think it’s time we responded in like at the polls come 2008. I plan on taking part in anyway I can in seeing that the following 23 GOP senators are serving their last terms:

Bennet (UT)
Bond (MO)
Brownback (KS)
Burr (NC)
Coleman (MN)
Collins (ME)
Craig (ID)
Domenici (NM)
Ensign (NV)
Graham (NH)
Hagel (NE)
Kyle (AZ)
Lott (MS)
Lugar (IN)
Martinez (FL)
McCain (AZ)
McConnell (KY)
*Murkowski (AK)
Snowe (ME)
Specter (PA)
*Stevens (AK)
Voinovich (OH)
Warner (VA)

* Of course Sen. Stevens and Murkowski voted for Shamnesty — being the furthest land-connected US state from Mexico, Alaska only has a 5.1% Hispanic population, with little to no chance of that increasing due to illegal immigration. Here in Texas (35.1%) and in California (35.2%), the cost of your amnesty program will be shouldered disproportionately to their burden.

__________

Bryan Preston asks:

What is going on behind the scenes to move so many democratically elected officials to vote against the express wishes of the voters who put them in office?

I’d like to know what incentives or promises were dangled in their greedy-little faces to make them ignore the overwhelming will of the voters.

Discussion

10 comments for “President Bush’s Shamnesty Plan Passes First Hurdle”

  1. Thanks for taking the time to “name the names” of the people responsible for allowing this bill to rear it’s ugly head.

    Would it be possible to have alternate entry points for those comming back into the US once the Z-Visa is issued in Mexico? I nominate Massachusetts. Let them take a few hurricane victims next time as well.

    Considering the huge opposition to this bill, how the hell is it still around? Does this have anything to do with oil? WTF?

    Posted by Kemo | June 26, 2007, 4:15 pm
  2. To say I am pissed is an understatement. That weasel Reid is fixing the whole process. I have never known an issue where so many people have besieged their legislators with their distaste of this amnesty bill. I’m not done yet and I hope you’re not either. Sam amnesty Brownback will continue to hear from me…

    Posted by Dianne | June 26, 2007, 6:05 pm
  3. Kemo — welcome to the conversation, buddy. What took you so long?

    Posted by Robbie | June 26, 2007, 7:07 pm
  4. It sounds like you suffer from Bush Derangement Syndrome.

    Posted by Preston | June 27, 2007, 8:04 am
  5. Heard Voinovich on the radio. El Asshole Grande. He won’t commit himself, so put him in the pro – amnesty column.

    Posted by kma | June 27, 2007, 4:13 pm
  6. What is going on behind the scenes to move so many democratically elected officials to vote against the express wishes of the voters who put them in office?

    This is exactly wrong. The vast majority of Americans want to give a path to citizenship to undocumented immigrants.

    Posted by Preston | June 28, 2007, 6:45 am
  7. Preston: You are exactly wrong. Refute this.

    Posted by Dianne | June 28, 2007, 7:17 am
  8. Dianne- There is no refuting that no one likes this bill. That’s the fate of a compromise.

    But the fact remains that Americans- by a two to one ratio- believe that illegal immigrants should have a path to citizenship.

    Posted by Preston | June 29, 2007, 6:58 am
  9. First Preston, consider the source of the poll (the open-borders cheering writers and editors of the NY Times).

    The question I assume you are alluding to is this one:

    What should happen to illegal immigrants who have been in the U.S. for at least two years?

    A) Should be deported
    B) Should be allowed to apply for legal status

    The problem is that there already is a path to legal status. It’s called going back to your home country, and applying to come here legally in accord with our country’s current immigration policy.

    Further, one of the amendments (from my honorable Senator Hutchinson) would have required those wishing for “legal status” to return home and apply from their country of origin — which is in accordance with our laws.

    But that amendment was voted down.

    Americans do not support amnesty. We do not support illegal immigration. We do however, support legal immigration. And I think that is what people in that poll were voting for.

    Posted by Robbie | June 29, 2007, 7:45 am
  10. The problem is that there already is a path to legal status. It’s called going back to your home country, and applying to come here legally in accord with our country’s current immigration policy.

    And that option was rejected by two to one by the American people.

    Your interpretation of the poll as refering to legal immigration is pretty desperate given the wording of the question:
    What should happen to illegal immigrants who have been in the U.S. for at least two years?

    Posted by Preston | June 30, 2007, 12:49 pm

Post a comment

Quicktags: