I see that Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged turns 50-years old today.
I read it when I was a junior in HS — not as an assigned book, but on my own one summer. I thought it was fantastic and couldn’t put it down. I thought that if only every one in the world could just read this book…
Of course, I also thought that MTV was the pinnacle of human achievement at that timepoint in my life.
I can understand how young kids can still be inspired by and — more accurately — hoodwinked by what has been called Rand’s “sophomoric” style. What I don’t understand is adults who still think this is great literature or great political ideology.
____
The NY Times has reposted their original review of Atlas by Granville Hick.
National Review posts their original review, too. The piece by Whittaker Chambers first appeared in the December 28, 1957, issue of NR:
Somebody has called it: “Excruciatingly awful.” I find it a remarkably silly book. It is certainly a bumptious one. Its story is preposterous.





Yeah, I’ve wanted to read that and the Fountainhead just for academic reasons but I’ve heard so many horror stories it seems like some bitter medicine to choke down. Yet, I see the Fountainhead is still the #1 book by architecture students at the school near me.
Scary.
I think a similar reassessment is ongoing for On the Road which also is just turning 50.
Left by Preston on September 15th, 2007 at 11:37 am