Search

Will the MSM and the nutroots grant Ginger Gilbert “absolute moral authority”, too? Or does that only apply to pro-defeat mothers of fallen soldiers (vs. pro-victory wives of fallen soldiers)?

(The answer is, No…of course they won’t.)

Days after an al-Qaida-linked group released a video showing the body of a Luke Air Force Base fighter pilot killed in Iraq last year, his widow lashed out at the national media, accusing it of politicizing and using the images to erode public support for the war.

Ginger Gilbert, making her first public comments since the video emerged last week, said Tuesday that she couldn’t remain silent after watching media coverage of a “disturbing video” of the corpse, identification card and crash site of her husband, Maj. Troy Gilbert.

“When media chooses to use Troy’s plane crash as a political catalyst to generate anti-war sentiment, it only serves to degrade the moral integrity my husband possessed and the morale of those still selflessly serving,” Gilbert said at news conference at Glendale’s Falcon Dunes Golf Course, across from Luke.

Every time the press lends credibility and significance to terrorist propaganda clearly designed to erode public support or questions the validity of our brave soldiers’ selfless acts of service and the war itself,” she added, “it only serves to damage our country from within its own borders and embolden those who would do us harm.”

Emphasis mine. Every time the MSM or Leftard bloggers open their mouths in regards to the War on Terror they do exactly that — lend credibility to our enemies.

Somehow I think that this widowed mother of 5 children would disagree with Sally Fields‘ “if mothers ruled the world” pile-of-shit analogy… And we know Sally doesn’t speak for Patricia Heaton, whom my mother said does speak for her (though my mother is the daughter of a retired Army Coronel, married a Sailor, sent three sons to the U.S. Army [albeit one of them only to the Texas Army National Guard], and now supports and prays for one of her grandchildren in the U.S. Army…so she might be a bit biased about the necessity of men fighting wars on our behalf).

_________

OTHERS:

Rusty at The Jawa Report:

I mourn with her at the grief of the loss of her husband, and I share her outrage at anti-war propagandists to use her husband’s death to discredit the cause he gave his life for.

Amen, brother.

The Tank on National Review notes, “As of this posting coverage of Ginger Gilbert’s press conference isn’t found beyond the local Phoenix media.” Well of course it isn’t. Why would the National news be interested in a mother who supports the troops and their mission.

Compare this minuscule coverage to the round-the-clock coverage of Cindy Sheehan sleeping in a ditch, and you’ll know which way the MSM slants when it comes to “reporting” on the war on terror (If it’s against it, it leads!)

12 Responses to “A Military Widow Lambasts the MSM for their Terrorist Propaganda Coverage”

I don’t understand: showing what happens in a war, death, destruction, blooshed, etc, is propaganda?

Hey John, good question!

Actually, the answer to this is yes. These kinds of images inevitably erode support for the war effort. FDR was smart enough to have them censored during World War 2, and LBJ was dumb enough to let the news networks show the killing on TV as Americans were eating dinner… and there’s a big difference between how those wars turned out.

The question was a bit sarcastic. I think the term “propaganda” has inherent negative connotations that imply the material is being presented in an unfair, slanted way. I really don’t see how showing war deaths in your news coverage of a war is “propaganda”, in this sense of the word.

Maybe it’s not that the “vast, left-wing conspiracy” is trying to brainwash U.S. Citizens…maybe it’s just that Americans are getting sick of their sons and daughters dying halfway around the world.

John, when the “news” footage is staged, shot, and produced by al jazeera, al Qaeda, or other questionable “local stringers”, and then broadcast by the US Media — it is nothing more than spreading the enemies propoganda.

Wait, answer this questin, true or false:

“Troy Gilbert was killed in combat.”

Despite who released the video, is the content of the video fact, or fiction?

And I take deep issue with people who claim any light cast on things we don’t like=siding with the enemy. See also, people who claim that CNN was “pandering to school shooters” when they aired segments of the Virginia Tech shooters videotapes.

Life is ugly people. War is ugly. It’s high time more people realized that the Iraq War isn’t all falling Saddam statues, parades, and clean, sterile, military funerals.

Hey John.

It depends what context you show your facts in. When it’s done clearly in a way to chip away at support for the war effort, it’s propaganda. It also depends on what you choose to focus on. Just as our media tells us exactly how many soldiers died today, it could also show us those terrible images (yours to see on Youtube) of people jumping out of the Twin Towers on 9/11. That was fact too, so you would have no problem with that either, right?

No, I don’t have a problem with it. In fact, I was pretty disgusted at how sterilized most of the 9/11 footage I saw on the news was. This was a great tragedy, and the news media has a responsibility to present it to Americans in all its brutal, uncesored horror, lest we forget. I don’t support media censorship in any form whatsoever, any more than I think textbooks should be banned from including graphic depictions of the Holocaust, or that english classes shouldn’t be able to teach Elie Weisel’s “Night”.

I think everyone needs to stop pretending that bad things go away when you close your eyes. Also Nazar, you can stop explaining propaganda to me as though I’m a child, thank you very much.

Also, I have yet to hear anybody say what context the videos were presented in (I haven’t seen them, myself, I don’t watch TV).

Oh yeah, does that bullshit presidential ban on photographing coffins still stand?

“`Where’s Mandela?‘ Well, Mandela’s dead because Saddam Hussein killed all the Mandelas.”

Propaganda or just a really, really stupid remark from an illiterate Texan.

Jacques:

Bush isn’t a Texan. The entire Bush clan hails from New England, where Bush was born, attended high school, and college.

Proud to be a NATIVE Texan,
–John

Besides that, if the Left could take off their Bush Derangement Syndrom (BDS) binders to quit criticizing and hating everything the President of our country says and does — you’d have to admit that he has a point (even if he didn’t articulate it in the well thought out/focus group approved manner that guys like Obama tend to speak):

The possibility of any “Mandelas” — activists who speak and act out against the atrocities and wrongs committed by their government — surviving in Saddam’s Iraq were exactly nil.

Do you really believe that Saddam would or did let any of his critics live and continue to disparage him — even from jail?

Because he didn’t. How Saddam treated those who opposed him in Iraq is not some exaggerated urban legend — he killed them all. And often in the most brutal and horrific manner imaginable.

President Bush made a valid and important observation. The left is just too blinded by hate to acknowledge it.

Oops, my mistake John - thought he had a Ranch in the neighborhood and was born there. Glad I’m no President. So Bush is actually an alien Texan. Does he speak Spanish?

He was talking about Mandela Robbie, a Nobel (peace) prize winner, better known than Madonna or Mother Theresa. Hell, better and much longer known than Bush himself.

New England possibly explains why he’s scared of horses and was a C student (and proud of it)

(and sees WMD in his Propaganda Dreams..)

And now I haven’t even really made a start with everything

How are you John?

I didn’t mean to patronize you, I’m sorry if you took offense at that.

The fact that you consider our media’s treatment of 9/11 overly sensitive gives you a lot of credibility for consistency in my book.

Got something you want to say?

Quicktags:


Notes:

You have 10 minutes after you submit your comment to edit it. Simply click the E(dit) link above the countdown-counter at the bottom of your comment. You can only edit a comment from the same IP address from where the original comment was submitted.

If your comment does not appear immediately, it has been sent to the moderation queue for approval.

Your comment either contained more than 2 hyperlinks, or it used a word(s) that are on my Spam blacklist. Comments awaiting moderation will usually be approved within a day.

And, being that it's my blog and all...I reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.