Search
Home  |   About  |   Q & A  |   Archives  |   Credits  |   Contact  |  
« Doing it Yourself
Mahmoudapalooza »

Union Workers: Not Doing the Job that Non-Union Workers Would (Gladly) Do

From Glenn Reynolds: “THE U.A.W. is now officially on strike against GM.”

Maybe GM should hire undocumented illegal workers to replace them — you know, immigrants doing the job that Americans won’t.

Though that sure would put Lefties in a dilemma as to which side to stand with (Union Workers vs. scabs who are “undocumented workers”) as they are both darlings of the Left.

______

UPDATE — Welcome Instapundit readers (my first Instalanche!) and thanks for the link, Glenn.

Check out this post of mine on Unions and their relationship with illegal workers, too: Union Wants To Keep Their Illegal Dues Paying Meatpackers 

Posted by Robbie Cooper on Monday, September 24th, 2007 | Trackback |

17 Responses to “Union Workers: Not Doing the Job that Non-Union Workers Would (Gladly) Do”

which side to stand with

Not hard to tell: As always in politics, the side that furnishes the most $. Unions would win hands-down.

Left by Shelby on September 24th, 2007 at 2:07 pm

Hey, this is a no-brainer!

It’s got the words ‘union’ and ‘undocumented’ in it. It is therefore good and worthy of support! Which side? Doesn’t matter… it’s all Bush’s fault anyway.

Left by John Burgess on September 24th, 2007 at 2:38 pm

Would it not be the best thing ever for GM to dismiss them once and for all? GM has enough problems as it is without an unreliable, ill-tempered, and short-sighted monolithic work force. They’re going to have a hard time both recovering and keeping these people happy.

Left by Morgan on September 24th, 2007 at 3:27 pm

I work two jobs to make ends meet. I wish GM would build a plant in my little town in Florida. All I want to enjoy is a raving excellent salary and benefits. Heck, I’ll even take care of my own pension savings plan so that the taxpayers won’t have to bail out the eventual default.

Left by Joan of Argghh! on September 24th, 2007 at 4:35 pm

Strikes hurt more than they help! Check out Caterpillar strikes in York, PA . The UAW is NOT the friend of the workers… check it out
http://www.kentlaw.edu/ilhs/cat.htm

Left by FedUp on September 24th, 2007 at 4:40 pm

The key imperative for any union is to SHUT OTHER WORKERS OUT OF THE MARKET so as co-opt an unfairly large piece of the pie for themselves, the chosen few. When you consider how shockingly illiberal this is, how utterly opposed to freedom of opportunity, it is amazing how many idiots think unions are a good thing.

Left by Kevin on September 24th, 2007 at 5:11 pm

Maybe it’s best to ask “whichever stop claiming benifits and get off their asses to work”?

Life is pretty hard - I know, I’ve struggled through from a pleb backing TShirts to being a company director.

Maybe stop moaning and get on with it?

Jonny

Left by Jon on September 24th, 2007 at 5:32 pm

As a consumer, I don’t want temporary workers
with no health benefits, or retirement, building my
car. I want people who approach their work
in a professional manner, rather than someone who’s
just there until he can land a job that pays a living
wage. Corporations need steady, well trained
personnel and unions need the jobs that corporations
create. If the corporations had no resistance to
lower wages and no benefits, there would be a
competition between corporations to pay lower wages,
until they work under asian conditions. So, unions put
resistance to that trend. We don’t want a United States
with working wages that mean you can’t eat well or live
in adequate lodgings. That was the case 90 years ago.
One of the presidential slogans was “a chicken in every pot”.

http://calling-muggins.blogspot.com/

Left by Muggins on September 24th, 2007 at 6:00 pm

I was thinking about buying a U.S. made car because I think it’s important that we support our domestic manufacturing industries, but now I just may go out and buy an import. The U.S. auto manufacturers must compete against non U.S. companies that have lower manufacturing costs, mostly because of lower labor costs. If the UAW insists on imposing higher costs on the Big Three, they will continue to have difficulty competing, leading to market share losses and fewer jobs in the U.S. The UAW is just cutting its own throat by going on strike. If the autoworkers had any sense of self-preservation, they would co-operate with management to defend against the competitive threats.

Left by Richard Beleson on September 24th, 2007 at 6:08 pm

until they work under asian conditions

Uh, wouldn’t that make them Nissan or Toyota? I had heard two descriptors of GM to this point - and never quite understood how true they were:

A defined benefits plan with an auto manufacturing division;

A health plan that makes cars on the side.

Left by Major John on September 24th, 2007 at 6:27 pm

As a mechanic, who spent most years at GM, I personally own two Toyota’s, by far a better car. Until the big three crush the unions, they will continue to make crap that only a fool would buy.

Left by Jacques on September 24th, 2007 at 7:25 pm

One of the biggest problems the UAW (and all unions) have is that the threat of a union frequently results in better wages and benefits than actually having one - http://www.enquirer.com/editions/2004/05/18/biz_biz1toy.html

“If the corporations had no resistance to
lower wages and no benefits, there would be a
competition between corporations to pay lower wages,
until they work under asian conditions”

Irrelevant in this case - most if not all Toyotas, Nissans and Hondas sold in the US were built here, or in Canada.

“I personally own two Toyota’s, by far a better car. Until the big three crush the unions…”

If either of them is a Corrolla or Tundra, they were built by UAW members.

Left by J on September 24th, 2007 at 11:44 pm

GM has had an “unreliable, ill-tempered, and short-sighted monolithic work force” since the early sixties. There is no way to keep these characters happy. Southeastern Michigan is crowded with ‘em. And look who they vote for!

Left by Anonymous on September 25th, 2007 at 3:14 am

As a mechanic, who spent most years at GM, I personally own two Toyota’s, by far a better car. Until the big three crush the unions, they will continue to make crap that only a fool would buy.

And again NOT My Post! I hate Toyota’s

Left by Jacques on September 25th, 2007 at 3:55 am

Muggins…..

I spent two years at Caterpillar…..same union, same mentality as any UAW operation…..

Most heard phrase by the workers on the line, “It ain’t my tractor!”

Professional……..right!

Duke

Left by Duke DeLand on September 25th, 2007 at 6:58 am

Actually a Camry made in Japan…..its a stick, the auto is made in Kentucky I believe. :)

Left by Blado on September 25th, 2007 at 3:52 pm

I’ve got mixed feelings about this one. First of all I don’t know what they’re striking for and if memory serves, GM let a big portion of their workforce go last spring under a buyout program and new hires are making significantly less than before with fewer benefits so maybe their strike has a legit basis. Anybody know the specifics?

Left by dianne on October 9th, 2008 at 8:52 am

Got something you want to say?

Quicktags:


Notes:

You have 10 minutes after you submit your comment to edit it. Simply click the E(dit) link above the countdown-counter at the bottom of your comment. You can only edit a comment from the same IP address from where the original comment was submitted.

If your comment does not appear immediately, it has been sent to the moderation queue for approval.

Your comment either contained more than 2 hyperlinks, or it used a word(s) that are on my Spam blacklist. Comments awaiting moderation will usually be approved within a day.

And, being that it's my blog and all...I reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.