Sep 182007
 

Alan Greenspan and the “War for Oil”

From Glenn:

THOUGHTS ON the misquotation of Alan Greenspan. It’s as if the press has an agenda that overrides its devotion to accurate reporting: “Greenspan claims that the quote was taken out of context. Greenspan called the Post — Bob Woodward, no less — to say that, in fact, he didn’t think the White House was motivated by oil. Rather, he was. A Post story Monday explained that Greenspan had long favored Saddam Hussein’s ouster because the Iraqi dictator was a threat to the Strait of Hormuz, through which much of the world’s oil passes every day.”

Nope, no anti-Bush agenda to see here. Move along people, move along.

________

PREVIOUSLY

Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post

  3 Responses to “What Media Bias? Part IX”

  1. You’re accusing Bob Woodward- Kissass to the Stars- of being liberal? That’s the thanks he gets for protraying George Bush as a man of steely resolve in Bush at War?

  2. Left gatekeepers propagated the myth the war was about oil. The truth is zionists like Greenspan have dragged the West into The Middle East Conflict on Israel’s side, on the back of a series of false flag terror attacks in the West blamed on ‘Muslim Terror’. Thats the truth. Thats why you don’t hear it.

  3. Great.

    The anti-Semites have found me.

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>