<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s Not the Government&#8217;s Job to Raise, Insure, or Pay for Your Children</title>
	<atom:link href="http://urbangrounds.com/2007/10/graeme-frost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2007/10/graeme-frost/</link>
	<description>Off-the-cuff commentary on the day&#039;s events</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:27:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hawaii Ending Universal Child Health Care After 7 Months Because Mamilies Were Dropping Private Coverage So Their Children Would Be Eligible For The Subsidized Plan &#124; Right Voices</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2007/10/graeme-frost/#comment-143221</link>
		<dc:creator>Hawaii Ending Universal Child Health Care After 7 Months Because Mamilies Were Dropping Private Coverage So Their Children Would Be Eligible For The Subsidized Plan &#124; Right Voices</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2007/10/08/graeme-frost/#comment-143221</guid>
		<description>[...] UrbanGrounds » Blog Archive » It’s Not the Government’s Job to Raise, Insure, or Pay for Your ... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UrbanGrounds » Blog Archive » It’s Not the Government’s Job to Raise, Insure, or Pay for Your &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marc</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2007/10/graeme-frost/#comment-103967</link>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 03:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2007/10/08/graeme-frost/#comment-103967</guid>
		<description>OK. admittedly I have not done as much research as you might have, but I believe a large part of the problem is that when an individual tries to get a policy with something already wrong with them they are almost always turned down. so a large percentage of people that could have their own ins. don&#039;t because they can&#039;t get it. yes there are state wide pools I believe in Texas that will take you but not many know of this. But if it were mandated that insurance companies could not turn down an individual sick or not that would help. In addition if this person could prove they could not pay the full premiums THEN the gov. would kick in a little for a set period of months or years until the person got a job that would take them...at least at that point you could say that anyone with any need and smarts could get insurance if they wanted without completely overhauling our medical system. that seems pretty darn simple to me..maybe not possible with all the lobby groups, I am sure the insurance lobby would hate that idea. but too bad I say. it&#039;s either that or costs keep going up or god forbid socialized medicine..and yes that would be a disaster in the long run. I would never trust the gov. again after the complete disaster of social security...I honestly doubt I will ever see all the money I put into that system..it&#039;s insane to think a bloated fat gov. bureaucracy can manage anything better an individual or private business can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK. admittedly I have not done as much research as you might have, but I believe a large part of the problem is that when an individual tries to get a policy with something already wrong with them they are almost always turned down. so a large percentage of people that could have their own ins. don&#8217;t because they can&#8217;t get it. yes there are state wide pools I believe in Texas that will take you but not many know of this. But if it were mandated that insurance companies could not turn down an individual sick or not that would help. In addition if this person could prove they could not pay the full premiums THEN the gov. would kick in a little for a set period of months or years until the person got a job that would take them&#8230;at least at that point you could say that anyone with any need and smarts could get insurance if they wanted without completely overhauling our medical system. that seems pretty darn simple to me..maybe not possible with all the lobby groups, I am sure the insurance lobby would hate that idea. but too bad I say. it&#8217;s either that or costs keep going up or god forbid socialized medicine..and yes that would be a disaster in the long run. I would never trust the gov. again after the complete disaster of social security&#8230;I honestly doubt I will ever see all the money I put into that system..it&#8217;s insane to think a bloated fat gov. bureaucracy can manage anything better an individual or private business can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patriot 123</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2007/10/graeme-frost/#comment-103951</link>
		<dc:creator>Patriot 123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 01:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2007/10/08/graeme-frost/#comment-103951</guid>
		<description>Marc,

Please give me a few more details on your idea for subsidized/guaranteed insurance. I have done quite a bit of thinking in the past on that and other ideas and of all the ones I have looked at, MSA&#039;s w/disaster insurance make the most sense to me. I like the idea of paying out of pocket (tax free) for all small expenditures under $1500. (Yes Jaques, if you are still there, I know that is a life savings for some people and we are not talking about them. They still qualify for SCHIP under the CURRENT rules). That gives me the option of negotiating with my doctor for a fair price and stops people from clogging up the system with stubbed toes. Let&#039;s face it, the thing that everyone fears is losing their house and life savings to a $500,000 cancer treatment bill. But that is not where the majority of insurance payouts are. They are paid out for the little crap that people waste doctors time on. That is why the socialist model fails so completely - it is free so why not use it any time we want? 
Disaster insurance that protects people from losing everything can be had for around $2,000/year and the other $5,000 that you or your employer are paying currently goes into a tax free medical savings account that gains interest and, if you stay healthy and don&#039;t use it, can be treated as a retirement account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc,</p>
<p>Please give me a few more details on your idea for subsidized/guaranteed insurance. I have done quite a bit of thinking in the past on that and other ideas and of all the ones I have looked at, MSA&#8217;s w/disaster insurance make the most sense to me. I like the idea of paying out of pocket (tax free) for all small expenditures under $1500. (Yes Jaques, if you are still there, I know that is a life savings for some people and we are not talking about them. They still qualify for SCHIP under the CURRENT rules). That gives me the option of negotiating with my doctor for a fair price and stops people from clogging up the system with stubbed toes. Let&#8217;s face it, the thing that everyone fears is losing their house and life savings to a $500,000 cancer treatment bill. But that is not where the majority of insurance payouts are. They are paid out for the little crap that people waste doctors time on. That is why the socialist model fails so completely &#8211; it is free so why not use it any time we want?<br />
Disaster insurance that protects people from losing everything can be had for around $2,000/year and the other $5,000 that you or your employer are paying currently goes into a tax free medical savings account that gains interest and, if you stay healthy and don&#8217;t use it, can be treated as a retirement account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patriot 123</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2007/10/graeme-frost/#comment-103914</link>
		<dc:creator>Patriot 123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 20:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2007/10/08/graeme-frost/#comment-103914</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Everybody is taking care of? How? Are you on (illegal)drugs or something? Do you live in the US?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes Jaques, that is a fact, not my opinion. Please feel free to do some checking. It is well documented.



&lt;blockquote&gt;Why pay for insurance if everybody is taken care of anyway, sounds like a â€˜communistâ€™ Cuba system to me.&lt;/blockquote&gt;



Because I believe in choice and not leaching off the system.



&lt;blockquote&gt;Well, okay - Patriot, believe in whatever you believe but, no offence, Iâ€™m done with your point of view on health care. We differ too much.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I agree, I don&#039;t think there is a middle ground between people who have the faith in their fellow countrymen to pull themselves up if given half a chance, and people who think everyone is so helpless that they need the government to micromanage their existence.



&lt;blockquote&gt;now itâ€™s the complete opposite, we ask the government to do everything dang thing for us except wipe our butts..sure that is next.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Marc, that used to be one of my favorite sayings also until I remodeled my bathroom and, on inspection, found that my toilet did not meet federal &quot;gallon per flush&quot; standards. You don&#039;t have to wait any longer for the government to monitor your butt wiping.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Everybody is taking care of? How? Are you on (illegal)drugs or something? Do you live in the US?</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes Jaques, that is a fact, not my opinion. Please feel free to do some checking. It is well documented.</p>
<blockquote><p>Why pay for insurance if everybody is taken care of anyway, sounds like a â€˜communistâ€™ Cuba system to me.</p></blockquote>
<p>Because I believe in choice and not leaching off the system.</p>
<blockquote><p>Well, okay &#8211; Patriot, believe in whatever you believe but, no offence, Iâ€™m done with your point of view on health care. We differ too much.</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree, I don&#8217;t think there is a middle ground between people who have the faith in their fellow countrymen to pull themselves up if given half a chance, and people who think everyone is so helpless that they need the government to micromanage their existence.</p>
<blockquote><p>now itâ€™s the complete opposite, we ask the government to do everything dang thing for us except wipe our butts..sure that is next.</p></blockquote>
<p>Marc, that used to be one of my favorite sayings also until I remodeled my bathroom and, on inspection, found that my toilet did not meet federal &#8220;gallon per flush&#8221; standards. You don&#8217;t have to wait any longer for the government to monitor your butt wiping.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2007/10/graeme-frost/#comment-103898</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 17:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2007/10/08/graeme-frost/#comment-103898</guid>
		<description>&quot;Everybody is taking care of? How? Are you on (illegal)drugs or something? Do you live in the US?&quot;

are you kidding Jacques??? ever hear how much money is lost in hospitals by people who come in for service and never or can&#039;t pay?????? ever hear of that? patriot is right, anyone who is sick in this country can go into a emergency room and be treated. now if you are talking about a cradle to grave government nanny state then yeah I don&#039;t want that......read our founding documents...we have gotten so far from what this country was set out to do, the federal gov has WAY overstepped is duties and role. .....please answer me this: why with the proven mismanagement government has with OUR money, why on god&#039;s green earth would you dare trust them with your healthcare????? why would a sane person do that? the road to the good life  very simple: stay in school, don&#039;t have 5 kids before you are 18, go to college with loans or grants, get out and get a decent job and you will move up the ladder, that&#039;s how we all do it....all good companies will offer some type of heath coverage, that still exists.! this is called a free market..but please why should the government be trusted after the awful mess of social security?? our health care will turn into the complete wasteful mess SS has become..no government controlled health for me...no one even commented on my earlier proposal to have insurance companies have to take you. then have the gov. subsidize your premiums for a few years if you can&#039;t pay them...simple and no nanny state. man what has happened to this strong country??? It used to be a point of pride to never ask the government for anything. Make it on your own, rugged spirit that carved this land into the tower of industrial strength it is..all from nothing but sweat and inventiveness....now it&#039;s the complete opposite, we ask the government to do everything dang thing for us except wipe our butts..sure that is next.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Everybody is taking care of? How? Are you on (illegal)drugs or something? Do you live in the US?&#8221;</p>
<p>are you kidding Jacques??? ever hear how much money is lost in hospitals by people who come in for service and never or can&#8217;t pay?????? ever hear of that? patriot is right, anyone who is sick in this country can go into a emergency room and be treated. now if you are talking about a cradle to grave government nanny state then yeah I don&#8217;t want that&#8230;&#8230;read our founding documents&#8230;we have gotten so far from what this country was set out to do, the federal gov has WAY overstepped is duties and role. &#8230;..please answer me this: why with the proven mismanagement government has with OUR money, why on god&#8217;s green earth would you dare trust them with your healthcare????? why would a sane person do that? the road to the good life  very simple: stay in school, don&#8217;t have 5 kids before you are 18, go to college with loans or grants, get out and get a decent job and you will move up the ladder, that&#8217;s how we all do it&#8230;.all good companies will offer some type of heath coverage, that still exists.! this is called a free market..but please why should the government be trusted after the awful mess of social security?? our health care will turn into the complete wasteful mess SS has become..no government controlled health for me&#8230;no one even commented on my earlier proposal to have insurance companies have to take you. then have the gov. subsidize your premiums for a few years if you can&#8217;t pay them&#8230;simple and no nanny state. man what has happened to this strong country??? It used to be a point of pride to never ask the government for anything. Make it on your own, rugged spirit that carved this land into the tower of industrial strength it is..all from nothing but sweat and inventiveness&#8230;.now it&#8217;s the complete opposite, we ask the government to do everything dang thing for us except wipe our butts..sure that is next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacques</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2007/10/graeme-frost/#comment-103887</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacques</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2007/10/08/graeme-frost/#comment-103887</guid>
		<description>Everybody is taking care of? How? Are you on (illegal)drugs or something? Do you live in the US?

Why pay for insurance if everybody is taken care of anyway, sounds like a &#039;communist&#039; Cuba system to me.

Well, okay - Patriot, believe in whatever you believe but, no offence, I&#039;m done with your point of view on health care. We differ too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everybody is taking care of? How? Are you on (illegal)drugs or something? Do you live in the US?</p>
<p>Why pay for insurance if everybody is taken care of anyway, sounds like a &#8216;communist&#8217; Cuba system to me.</p>
<p>Well, okay &#8211; Patriot, believe in whatever you believe but, no offence, I&#8217;m done with your point of view on health care. We differ too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patriot 123</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2007/10/graeme-frost/#comment-103882</link>
		<dc:creator>Patriot 123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2007/10/08/graeme-frost/#comment-103882</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;50 million Americans are uninsured. What about them? If you donâ€™t agree with the number, okay - fill in your own number, thatâ€™s not the most important thing.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If you had read an earlier post, you would have seen that I already answered that question. No person - legal or otherwise - is denied health care. Please stop confusing health care and health insurance. Everyone is taken care of. The difference is that the socialist system takes away choice. For those who truly can not afford to pay their own way, it is absolutely the citizenry&#039;s responsibility to help. Societies will invariably crumble if the truly helpless are ignored. But the socialist model is wasteful and inefficient for those that can afford it. The system that is being proposed here moves 1 in 3 people off private insurance and on to the government system. Why should I have to pay for someone who is making twice as much as I am but chooses to spend his money on drugs or expensive cars?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>50 million Americans are uninsured. What about them? If you donâ€™t agree with the number, okay &#8211; fill in your own number, thatâ€™s not the most important thing.</p></blockquote>
<p>If you had read an earlier post, you would have seen that I already answered that question. No person &#8211; legal or otherwise &#8211; is denied health care. Please stop confusing health care and health insurance. Everyone is taken care of. The difference is that the socialist system takes away choice. For those who truly can not afford to pay their own way, it is absolutely the citizenry&#8217;s responsibility to help. Societies will invariably crumble if the truly helpless are ignored. But the socialist model is wasteful and inefficient for those that can afford it. The system that is being proposed here moves 1 in 3 people off private insurance and on to the government system. Why should I have to pay for someone who is making twice as much as I am but chooses to spend his money on drugs or expensive cars?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacques</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2007/10/graeme-frost/#comment-103881</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacques</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2007/10/08/graeme-frost/#comment-103881</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&quot;I have always provided for my family and am quite adequately prepared for the future (but thanks for your concern),&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

50 million Americans are uninsured. What about them? If you don&#039;t agree with the number, okay - fill in your own number, that&#039;s not the most important thing. 

But still what about them? Do you have an answer? An Idea? Something?

What about all those people who can&#039;t afford health care?

They all should get a job can&#039;t be the answer, because most people don&#039;t get the benefits. And how do you want to pay $700 and up a month on a low paid job income when you have a wife and two kids?

So, if you&#039;ve an answer I&#039;m genuinely interested. What I see here is conservatives bashing liberal ideas but I don&#039;t see any conservative solutions or answers to the problem. Because it&#039;s a problem or isn&#039;t it.

And about other countries, Europe: I&#039;m not saying it&#039;s paradise there - because it isn&#039;t. But they do a damn better job in taking care of each other.

People in a modern civilized society should take care of the weakest and poorest. And it makes you feel good - helping others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;I have always provided for my family and am quite adequately prepared for the future (but thanks for your concern),&#8221;</em></p>
<p>50 million Americans are uninsured. What about them? If you don&#8217;t agree with the number, okay &#8211; fill in your own number, that&#8217;s not the most important thing. </p>
<p>But still what about them? Do you have an answer? An Idea? Something?</p>
<p>What about all those people who can&#8217;t afford health care?</p>
<p>They all should get a job can&#8217;t be the answer, because most people don&#8217;t get the benefits. And how do you want to pay $700 and up a month on a low paid job income when you have a wife and two kids?</p>
<p>So, if you&#8217;ve an answer I&#8217;m genuinely interested. What I see here is conservatives bashing liberal ideas but I don&#8217;t see any conservative solutions or answers to the problem. Because it&#8217;s a problem or isn&#8217;t it.</p>
<p>And about other countries, Europe: I&#8217;m not saying it&#8217;s paradise there &#8211; because it isn&#8217;t. But they do a damn better job in taking care of each other.</p>
<p>People in a modern civilized society should take care of the weakest and poorest. And it makes you feel good &#8211; helping others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
