Search
Home  |   About  |   Q & A  |   Archives  |   Credits  |   Contact  |  
« Illegal Immigrants in Mexico Denied Drivers Licences
Democratic Debate (Live) »

When Dems Attack (each other)

Poor, poor Hillary. The meanie boys have been picking on her…

So much so that in tonight’s Democratic debate, the boys have all been asked to “not pick on Hillary”. You know — ’cause she’s a girl.

“When it takes two weeks and six different positions to answer one question on immigration, it’s easier to understand why the Clinton campaign would rather plant their questions than answer them,” said Bill Burton, a spokesman for Senator Barack Obama of Illinois, a rival in the race for the nomination.

Shady campaign donors, questionable leadership skills, lack of experience, hated by more than half of all Americans — is this really the best that Democrats have to offer our country? Is this really the best that America has to choose from?

I wouldn’t trust Hillary to walk my dogs (especially after finding out what has happened to their family pets once the media turns their backs on Hillary) — much less lead our country.

Posted by Robbie Cooper on Thursday, November 15th, 2007 | Trackback |

7 Responses to “When Dems Attack (each other)”

How prescient of you, Robbie, as this story is titled…Why Hillary Should Not Be Trusted.

Left by no2liberals on November 15th, 2007 at 11:20 pm

When Dems Attack (each other)

It’s one of the advantages of the GOP having a sympathetic network to go to and throw softballs for them…

Left by Preston on November 17th, 2007 at 10:28 pm

Come’on — even other Liberals are calling it the Clinton Cable Network.

And last I checked, Hillary was not a member of the GOP.

You have to be kidding me about the Libs not having a sympathetic network lobbing softballs — the entire CNN audience was handpicked and questions were planted.

Or do you not consider “Diamonds or pearls?” to be a softball question?

Then there’s CBS, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, PBS, and every other network not named FOXNews that is firmly in the Lefty trenches…

Left by Robbie on November 18th, 2007 at 12:04 am

Do you think “Diamonds or Pearls” does Clinton a favor? It’s another bs question from a bs network that marginalizes her as someone not ready for ‘big boy’ questions.

Are you really unable to see the difference in questions asked by mainstream journalistic outlets and those from Fox? Next time the GOP is on Fox point out if the moderator ever forces the candidates to take a question designed to alienate him from the base.

That’s the difference.

Left by Preston on November 18th, 2007 at 9:18 am

FOX is, by every definition, a mainstream news organization.
Based on their audience numbers, the leader in their medium.
The donks being so fearful of attending a debate on their network is an indication of it’s success, and of their fear of being asked a question they are unprepared to answer, and that their diversionary and obfuscating answers will be confronted.
Haven’t you heard or read of how cnn controlled and manipulated this entire so-called debate, in hillary’s favor? Even the Krazy Kos Kidz are talking cursing about it.

Left by no2liberals on November 18th, 2007 at 11:01 am

Haven’t you heard or read of how cnn controlled and manipulated this entire so-called debate, in hillary’s favor?

And if this is true, it’s supposed to prove how liberal CNN is?

You realize that Hillary Clinton is the most conservative Democrat running for President?

My point is simply that Fox News provides a sympathetic forum for the GOP field that does not exist for the Democratic field. It should be plainly obvious when Brit Hume lectures the Democratic party about ‘what it should do’ that FNC is not attempting to achieve a non-partisan journalism.

Honestly, the partisan forum for the debates isn’t necessarily a bad thing- but the Democrats are disadvantaged by the lack of one: the point of the primaries and the debates is to conduct an internal dialog. I don’t see the point of Tim Russert or Wolf Blitzer asking questions from GOP talking points when the Democratic primary voter doesn’t even accept the premise of their questioning and isn’t aided in their decision by that questioning.

Left by Preston on November 18th, 2007 at 9:20 pm

so the “Democratic primary voter doesn’t even accept” that an illegal immigrant either gets a legitimate drivers license or not? sounds pretty spineless…

Left by Anonymous on November 19th, 2007 at 1:38 am

Got something you want to say?

Quicktags:


Notes:

You have 10 minutes after you submit your comment to edit it. Simply click the E(dit) link above the countdown-counter at the bottom of your comment. You can only edit a comment from the same IP address from where the original comment was submitted.

If your comment does not appear immediately, it has been sent to the moderation queue for approval.

Your comment either contained more than 2 hyperlinks, or it used a word(s) that are on my Spam blacklist. Comments awaiting moderation will usually be approved within a day.

And, being that it's my blog and all...I reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.