From the NY Times:
Advisers to Senators Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama say that the candidates have watched security conditions improve after the troop escalation in Iraq and concluded that it would be folly not to acknowledge those gains.
It would be nice if the Left and their Democratic puppets could actually root for victory in Iraq and be the leaders in applauding our obvious successes in our war against terrorists.
Rather than simply “acknowledging gains” in Iraq, the left and Dems are soon going to have to come up with new ways to spin victory in Iraq, as we are well on our way to exactly that.
How sad is it that one of the worst things that could happen to the Democratic party would be a clear victory in Iraq?
____
OTHERS:
Rob at Say Anything: “And, of course, when I say the war isn’t going how Democrats want I mean we aren’t losing.”
The situation is getting better in Iraq, but the narrative in Washington remains the same. As our troops and their Iraqi allies rack up more and more victories against terrorism in Iraq, the Democrats keep wanting to pull the rug out from under them. It’s one thing to advocate for surrender in a war that’s going badly—it’s entirely another to do the same in a war that’s being won. The fact that the Democrats can’t seem to understand that demonstrates just how much the narrative has overwhelmed their common sense.
We are winning in Iraq.
Will someone please inform the Democrats?






It’s one thing to advocate for surrender in a war that’s going badly—it’s entirely another to do the same in a war that’s being won.
Of course, there is no appropriate time to leave Iraq in the mind of George Bush. I’m not sure what happened to the ‘humble foreign policy’ that Bush campaigned on but it looks an awful lot like an empire to me.
Left by Preston on November 26th, 2007 at 9:53 pm