Comments on: When Dems Attack (each other)

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 06:38:55 +0000

so the “Democratic primary voter doesnâ€™t even accept” that an illegal immigrant either gets a legitimate drivers license or not? sounds pretty spineless…

By: Preston

Preston — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 02:20:31 +0000

Havenâ€™t you heard or read of how cnn controlled and manipulated this entire so-called debate, in hillaryâ€™s favor?

And if this is true, it’s supposed to prove how liberal CNN is?

You realize that Hillary Clinton is the most conservative Democrat running for President?

My point is simply that Fox News provides a sympathetic forum for the GOP field that does not exist for the Democratic field. It should be plainly obvious when Brit Hume lectures the Democratic party about ‘what it should do’ that FNC is not attempting to achieve a non-partisan journalism.

Honestly, the partisan forum for the debates isn’t necessarily a bad thing- but the Democrats are disadvantaged by the lack of one: the point of the primaries and the debates is to conduct an internal dialog. I don’t see the point of Tim Russert or Wolf Blitzer asking questions from GOP talking points when the Democratic primary voter doesn’t even accept the premise of their questioning and isn’t aided in their decision by that questioning.

By: no2liberals

no2liberals — Sun, 18 Nov 2007 16:01:01 +0000

FOX is, by every definition, a mainstream news organization.
Based on their audience numbers, the leader in their medium.
The donks being so fearful of attending a debate on their network is an indication of it’s success, and of their fear of being asked a question they are unprepared to answer, and that their diversionary and obfuscating answers will be confronted.
Haven’t you heard or read of how cnn controlled and manipulated this entire so-called debate, in hillary’s favor? Even the Krazy Kos Kidz are ~~talking~~ cursing about it.

By: Preston

Preston — Sun, 18 Nov 2007 14:18:13 +0000

Do you think “Diamonds or Pearls” does Clinton a favor? It’s another bs question from a bs network that marginalizes her as someone not ready for ‘big boy’ questions.

Are you really unable to see the difference in questions asked by mainstream journalistic outlets and those from Fox? Next time the GOP is on Fox point out if the moderator ever forces the candidates to take a question designed to alienate him from the base.

That’s the difference.

By: Robbie

Robbie — Sun, 18 Nov 2007 05:04:07 +0000

Come’on — even other Liberals are calling it the Clinton Cable Network.

And last I checked, Hillary was not a member of the GOP.

You have to be kidding me about the Libs not having a sympathetic network lobbing softballs — the entire CNN audience was handpicked and questions were planted.

Or do you not consider “Diamonds or pearls?” to be a softball question?

Then there’s CBS, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, PBS, and every other network not named FOXNews that is firmly in the Lefty trenches…

By: Preston

Preston — Sun, 18 Nov 2007 03:28:20 +0000

When Dems Attack (each other)

It’s one of the advantages of the GOP having a sympathetic network to go to and throw softballs for them…

By: no2liberals

no2liberals — Fri, 16 Nov 2007 04:20:07 +0000

How prescient of you, Robbie, as this story is titled...Why Hillary Should Not Be Trusted.