<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Democrats Grudgingly Admitting Gains in Iraq</title>
	<atom:link href="http://urbangrounds.com/2007/11/dems-hate-victory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2007/11/dems-hate-victory/</link>
	<description>Off-the-cuff commentary on the day&#039;s events</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:55:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: no2liberals</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2007/11/dems-hate-victory/#comment-112947</link>
		<dc:creator>no2liberals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2007/11/24/dems-hate-victory/#comment-112947</guid>
		<description>President Bush didn&#039;t campaign on &quot;preemption&quot; either, but after 9-11, it became his approach, to deal with those who presented a clear threat of further attacks.  I for one support preemption over feckless hand-wringers, who watch as we are attacked all over the globe with only some meandering speeches as a response, a few cruise missiles launched at aspirin factories.
Doesn&#039;t sound like empire to me, it sounds like nation building after the destructive forces of war, kind of like the Marshall Plan after WWII.  Empire, what a tired expression.  The U.S. is a liberator, not an occupier.  Do we have interest in the ME?  Absolutely!  We can and must protect our interest.  Of course, I realize there are those that say, they don&#039;t need oil...because they ride the bus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Bush didn&#8217;t campaign on &#8220;preemption&#8221; either, but after 9-11, it became his approach, to deal with those who presented a clear threat of further attacks.  I for one support preemption over feckless hand-wringers, who watch as we are attacked all over the globe with only some meandering speeches as a response, a few cruise missiles launched at aspirin factories.<br />
Doesn&#8217;t sound like empire to me, it sounds like nation building after the destructive forces of war, kind of like the Marshall Plan after WWII.  Empire, what a tired expression.  The U.S. is a liberator, not an occupier.  Do we have interest in the ME?  Absolutely!  We can and must protect our interest.  Of course, I realize there are those that say, they don&#8217;t need oil&#8230;because they ride the bus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2007/11/dems-hate-victory/#comment-112927</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 21:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2007/11/24/dems-hate-victory/#comment-112927</guid>
		<description>perhaps you recall the congressional approval? maybe you should write your representative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>perhaps you recall the congressional approval? maybe you should write your representative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2007/11/dems-hate-victory/#comment-112884</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2007/11/24/dems-hate-victory/#comment-112884</guid>
		<description>The terrorist attacks of September 11 mean that the United States should indefinitely occupy Iraq?  I don&#039;t remember the public outcry for that outcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The terrorist attacks of September 11 mean that the United States should indefinitely occupy Iraq?  I don&#8217;t remember the public outcry for that outcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2007/11/dems-hate-victory/#comment-112727</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 05:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2007/11/24/dems-hate-victory/#comment-112727</guid>
		<description>could it be that 9/11 happened? 
perhaps you should revisit some chinese or roman history and then you will realize, there are some substantial differences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>could it be that 9/11 happened?<br />
perhaps you should revisit some chinese or roman history and then you will realize, there are some substantial differences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2007/11/dems-hate-victory/#comment-112691</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 02:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2007/11/24/dems-hate-victory/#comment-112691</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Itâ€™s one thing to advocate for surrender in a war thatâ€™s going badlyâ€”itâ€™s entirely another to do the same in a war thatâ€™s being won.&lt;/em&gt;

Of course, there is &lt;strong&gt;no&lt;/strong&gt; appropriate time to leave Iraq in the mind of George Bush.  I&#039;m not sure what happened to the &#039;humble foreign policy&#039; that Bush campaigned on but it looks an awful lot like an empire to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Itâ€™s one thing to advocate for surrender in a war thatâ€™s going badlyâ€”itâ€™s entirely another to do the same in a war thatâ€™s being won.</em></p>
<p>Of course, there is <strong>no</strong> appropriate time to leave Iraq in the mind of George Bush.  I&#8217;m not sure what happened to the &#8216;humble foreign policy&#8217; that Bush campaigned on but it looks an awful lot like an empire to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
