The New Republic and Franklin Foer finally admit what we have all known from the very start — that the Scott Beauchamp “horrors of war” stories that he and his wife wrote/edited for TNR are complete bullshit lies.
TNR shouldn’t even be allowed to print cartoons without a disclaimer to the effect of “everything in this magazine is entirely made up. Any likeness to real persons or events is purely coincidental”.
Head over to MM’s place, where she has a great roundup.
It’s great that the blogosphere rooted out Scott Thomas relatively quickly- it took years for Jayson Blair or Janet Cooke to be found out in those technologically benighted days.
I do have to ask though if you’ll be starting a similar crusade in reaction to the National Review’s publication of fraudulent claims that Hezbollah has deployed thousands of armed men to the Christian areas of Beirut?
He doesn’t have to because unlike Foer, the editor of NRO didn’t stall or lie about the allegations. Again, you attempt to change the subject to throw off attention on how scummy the left is.
Henh.
The Left? Kill me if you ever see me reading that rag.
In any case, Franklin Foer’s mea culpa provides infinite more transparency than Kathryn Jean Lopez’s account of how the two magazines got it wrong.
Here are the facts:
As editor of The New Republic, Franklin Foer allowed Scott Thomas Beauchamp to publish three stories that were not competently fact-checked. At least one of those that was assigned to his wife to fact-check even though that was a clear conflict of interest. All three of those stories—not just”ShockTroops”— had significant “red flags†in them. These red flags range from the changing of a tire of a vehicle equipped with run-flat tires in “War Bonds,” to several obvious and easily verifiable untrue statements, including the claim of a discovery of a kind of ammunition that do not exist, and absurd evidence for allegations of murder “Dead of Night” that could have been (and were) debunked in less than 30 seconds with a simple Google search.
The bottom line is that the Scott Beauchamp debacle was a test of editorial character for The New Republic under Franklin Foer’s leadership. For over four months, the magazine has answered that challenge by hiding behind anonymous sources, making personal attacks against critics, asserting a a massive conspiracy against them, while covering up conflicting testimony and refusing to answer the hard questions.
Even to the end, Foer continues to blame everyone else for his continuing editorial failures., penning a fourteen-page excuse without a single, “I’m sorry.”
The readers and staff deserve better, and it is past time for Franklin Foer to leave The New Republic.
Bob Owens sums it up succinctly.
Got something you want to say?
Notes:
You have 10 minutes after you submit your comment to edit it. Simply click the E(dit) link above the countdown-counter at the bottom of your comment. You can only edit a comment from the same IP address from where the original comment was submitted.
If your comment does not appear immediately, it has been sent to the moderation queue for approval.
Your comment either contained more than 2 hyperlinks, or it used a word(s) that are on my Spam blacklist. Comments awaiting moderation will usually be approved within a day.
And, being that it's my blog and all...I reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.
Posting tweet...
Copyright (c) 2004-2008 UrbanGrounds. All rights reserved.
Entries (RSS) and Comments
(RSS).
What a bunch of weasels!
It took fourteen pages to come to this concluding paragraph?
Not to mention their constant moaning about the Army’s interference with their investigation or fact-checking.
TNR and Scott Thomas deserve each other.
Had it not been for the obvious bogus stories to begin with, carefully and craftily dissected by milblogs, I would have never known about this rag anyway.
Left by no2liberals on December 1st, 2007 at 10:31 pm