Q — What do victory in Iraq and a healthy, growing economy have in common?
A — They are both bad politically bad for the Democratic party.
And that’s a very telling and pathetic indicator of the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling that defines the Democratic party.
_______
Leading Dems have been rooting and politicking for a loss in Iraq since the war started. They’re just recently starting to shut-the-fuck-up a little on that meme, since indications of success and victory are becoming harder and harder to deny.
Which leaves the Defeat-o-crats with the economy. You know, the doom-and-gloom economy that the Left has been trying to blame on the GOP — despite all evidence to the contrary that times are pretty damn good.
Today’s news from the Feds won’t make the Dems happy:
Solid Job Gains, Wage Growth in Nov.
WASHINGTON (AP) — Employers added a solid 94,000 jobs to their payrolls in November, the unemployment rate held steady at 4.7 percent and wages grew briskly, encouraging signs the nation’s employment climate is holding up in the face of turbulence in the housing and credit markets.
The fresh snapshot of the labor market, released by the Labor Department on Friday, showed that hiring was brisk in education and health services, retail, professional services, the government and elsewhere. That helped to offset job losses in construction, manufacturing and financial services — casualties of the housing slump and credit crunch.
The 94,000 new jobs in November came after a surprisingly strong payroll gain of 170,000 in October. The unemployment rate stayed at a relatively low 4.7 percent for the third straight month.
Well, shit — if the Dems can’t keep supporting defeat in Iraq (where we’re winning), and they can’t convince people the economic sky is falling (when it’s not), then all they’ve really got left is the “Culture of Corruption” meme — remember Nancy Pelosi promising to “drain the swamp”?
And since the Dems are every bit as crooked and corrupt as the GOP, that’s not really a topic you want as “THE TOPIC’ going into 2008.




“despite all evidence to the contrary that times are pretty damn good”
Really? You’re talking about the US? The new Bush ‘emergency mortgage’ plan? The US dollar which has almost vanished into thin air? Unemployment? Health Care? Upcoming Elections? Iraq?
Why don’t you sing with me.. (Chic Lyrics)
Thou hath not so much brain as ear wax.
And another simple quote from our beloved y2l. Boy start to be original or shut the fuck up.
Make me, commie.
How now, wool-sack, what mutter you?
It’s true, no one can make you be original.
If I may intrude on the schoolyard squabble many readers here may find interesting this debunking by conservative economists the notion that tax cuts raise revenue:
Oh My!
If his name wasn’t laffer, he would need a name change.
I think Democrats beat you to that joke by about 27 years…
In any case, you understand that there was a surplus under the Clinton administration for the first time in 30 years?
Perhaps your appreciation of Clinton’s economic achievements is clouded by your fixation on the Clinton hit squads taking out Ron Brown and Vince Foster.
Henh.
I haven’t seen any evidence of Clintoon’s economic achievements to date. I will say, that his wifes botched attempt at commandeering one seventh of our national economy with her commie health plan, did usher in the Republican controlled Congress in ‘94, so I will recognize his achievement in screwing up in reverse.
The fact that the dot com boom occurred during his administration, had nothing to do with his policies, or algore’s inventions, and had momentum of it’s own, until the bubble popped in his last year of office, leaving the Clinton recession to start off W’s administration.
Tax cuts have worked in increasing revenue, every time they have been tried; under (John)Kennedy, Reagan, and Bush. The problem with the Republican Congress that got turned out in 06 is, they spent too much money, which the donks are trying to expound on.
Larry Kudlow.
You’re right- growth under Republican Presidents was a result of conservative policies but growth under Democratic Presidents was all a coinicidence.
Henh.
Too much credit and blame is given the POTUS on the economy, except when he signs off on outrageous spending by Congress.
As for the last Democratic President that was worth a flip, Kennedy, he was a conservative, but the modern donk party doesn’t allow conservative members a seat at the table. Just ask Lieberman.