Search

Feign surprise

People who took out risky subprime loans essentially were gambling that yesterday’s low interest rate would never become tomorrow’s un-payable higher rate. Why is anybody shocked that they were wrong?

Blame “greedy” or “predatory” lenders all you want — but almost all of the responsibility for taking out a loan that you can’t repay falls on the person who took out that loan. Period.

All of this talk of bailing out people who took a gamble on their home loans and lost pisses me off. Once again, it’s the government disavowing people of taking responsibility for their own doings.

Which is why nobody should find this headline surprising in the least:

Nevada Had Top Foreclosure Rate in 2007

No way!

A state known for gambling is the hardest hit by a foreclosure rate that was predicated by people gambling on their home loans! Who would have ever thought?!?!

5 Responses to “Nevada’s Gamble on Subprime Home Mortgages Ends by Crapping Out”

LV had been the fastest growing city in America for many, many years in a row, until this year. Now it’s McKinney, Tx, a formerly sleepy farming town north of Dallas, and they haven’t stopped building there yet.
A clue for the clueless, the problem is identified in the very name of this type of loan. Sub-Prime.
Once again, the government should build and maintain the roads, provide for national defense and vital national interests, regulate commerce, and leave me the f*#k alone.
Bail-outs? Stimulus packages? I call BS, they are handouts, candy for the electorate in an election year.

The love of money is the root of all evil.

There were greedy lenders who took advantage of people, some of whom didn’t even read English. And, there were people who didn’t even have a job that got loans because nobody checked their employment status. And, a great many of the people LIED about their income, their debts, their legal status, their job status, etc. These sorts don’t care how long their little joy ride lasts, they’ll ride it till they get caught and then walk away, leaving the rest of us with their bills.

Not too long ago if you wanted to buy a house, you had to have a 20% downpayment, or with less, such as 10%, you were put under plenty of scrutiny. Somebody (maybe it was on this blog) said the regs were changed to allow for more minorities to get loans. If it was somebody on this blog, I’d appreciate a reference.

Dianne- regulations were changed so banks could make more money.

It’s greed if you buy more house than you can afford, it’s fraud when someone you hire to get you a mortgage misrepresents a high-cost, high-commission loan as the best deal for his client.

It’s nice to talk about personal responsibility but the fact is that the government allowed these fraudulent loans to go through even after the warning bells started ringing. Why? Dogmatic adherence to “deregulation” and the greed of the political donor class.

… it’s fraud when someone you hire to get you a mortgage misrepresents a high-cost, high-commission loan as the best deal for his client.

what if the high cost, high commission loan is the best deal for the client?

Well, let them both share the blame.

I think your banks were way to easy with other peoples cash. That was the problem, it wasn’t their money, outside bond funds etc., were. So of course they didn’t care about if someone could pay it back, they didn’t make money that way, they made money on volume.

So you had people that were perhaps foolish to think they could afford an expensive house, but that error is far more ethical than someone already swimming in pools of cash doing this criminally.

Basically a few thousand lenders may have brought down the u.s.a’s economy for the next 10 years. They’ve done for more damage than any drug baron, or Osama.

You have to regulate the industry, otherwise these guys start to think they are gods and untouchable, and sadly…everyone else pays, never the nincompoops that helped cause it.

As for the borrowers, again, kinda stupid, but their only error was wishing to be home owners…not really that evil..just misguided.

BUT..one final issue. Given the rise in house prices, nobody should have been affording those homes. The average wage has only increased (when you balance out prices etc.,) by about 60$ since 1980. And that’s with double incomes!

Trust me, someone got very rich off this…and frankly they should be the first ones lined up!

oops!

Got something you want to say?

Quicktags:


Notes:

You have 10 minutes after you submit your comment to edit it. Simply click the E(dit) link above the countdown-counter at the bottom of your comment. You can only edit a comment from the same IP address from where the original comment was submitted.

If your comment does not appear immediately, it has been sent to the moderation queue for approval.

Your comment either contained more than 2 hyperlinks, or it used a word(s) that are on my Spam blacklist. Comments awaiting moderation will usually be approved within a day.

And, being that it's my blog and all...I reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.