I honestly can’t believe what I’m reading: American conservatives are basing their votes for President on Sharia law. WTF?!?

No, once again you are way off.
I would never vote for a donk, first off, as I’m a devout anti-Marxist. Secondly, I would never vote for a muslim, stealth or practicing, for any public office.
Hope you can grasp that info correctly.

tried a variety of both and neither was “good”. in fact i’ve seen little in any liberal context that doesn’t primarily highlight race or sex, usually not so subtly veiled by words like “historic” or “change”. but seriously, the platforms are essentially indistinguishable, extremely vague, and naive.

Are they the ‘best’? I don’t know, but they’re good and any discussion on their merits has little to do with their race or gender as I read the following to suggest:

it’s hillarious that in the party of “progressives”, we’ve finally reached a point where the backlash of hollow pc ideaology has democrats fighting over which victim should be the next to represent them. really

on the contrary, most liberal debate seems to be concerning obama vs. clinton, which is essentially what i said. you aren’t seriously trying to suggest that these two are the best the democrats have to offer as leaders for the country? just out of curiosity, where would one find “an actual debate between progressives”?

If you go to an actual debate between progressives there is no discussion such as you describe.

As for Sharia law, I was informed that I can’t vote for Senator Clinton because Muslim men would object and that I can’t vote for Senator Obama because Muslim theocrats would object. It sounds like the search for dhimmitude should begin at home.