Search

Is serving and or eating fried chicken racist? It’s a straight forward question. Either it is or it isn’t.

The day that you serve and/or eat fried chicken shouldn’t matter at all. If serving and eating fried chicken (or watermelon) is racist, then it’s always racist.

Apparently this is not true at the Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT) in NY, where the manager of the campus dining services had to issue an apology the day after MLK Day, where he dared to serve — you guessed it, souther grub (to include fried chicken).

Bob Lonsberry has a  fantastic column on the story — read the entire thing, he makes some salient points about the idiocy behind the political correctness gone awry at RIT:

Somebody out looking for a reason to be offended found one. Somebody who had spent too much time in multicultural class just knew that fried chicken was code for anti-black racism. In the chip-on-your-shoulder world of today’s civil rights crusaders, the RIT menu was a slap in the face of Martin Luther King and of black people everywhere.

It’s amazing there wasn’t a sit in or a march or a Sharpton visit.

[snip]

That’s what’s wrong with America.

We’ve had too much sensitivity training. We’ve trained people to look for offense where none was meant. We’ve trained people that it doesn’t matter what is intended, it only matters what is perceived. If you decide to be offended, you’re right and whoever you accuse is wrong. They must apologize and you must be unquestioned.

Bob notes that the man responsible for the menu AND all the extra time and effort to plan and cook this meal? Herman Parson. Is Herman a racist? I don’t know. But he is a black man. So I doubt he was trying to offend anybody. He was simply trying to offer a great meal to honor the day. And yet he  was made to apologize. For serving fried chicken.

When I was stationed at Ft. Riley, Kansas — home of the Big Red One (1st Infantry Division) — once a month the post celebrated “Big Red One Day”.

Because it was the Army, where we speak in acronyms, the once a month “holiday” was shortened to “BRO Day”.  Pronounced “Bro”, rather than “B-R-O”.

On Bro Day — usually a Thursday, if I remember correctly — we got off work at noon so that we could spend the day with our families. Additionally, the dining facilities served a special lunch. Our dining facility always went with southern food: fried chicken, collard greens, cornbread, ham hocks, black eyed peas, macaroni and cheese, fried cat fish, fried okra, red beans and rice, dirty rice, candied yams, and BBQ ribs.

The line started forming well before lunch was served, and people came from all over post to eat at our dining facility (701st MSB) up on the hill. It was by far the most popular day at this DFAC.

As it turns out, the Army has more Soldiers from the south than it does from the North, Midwest, West Coast or East Coast. And most of us grew up eating these “comfort” foods most of our lives.

Of course it never occurred to me that serving fried chicken on Bro day had any racial connotation at all. There certainly weren’t any protests outside the facility calling for increased racial sensitivity.

You know why? Because eating fried chicken isn’t racist. “Everybody eats fried chicken. It’s inexpensive and good”.

8 Responses to “Is Serving Fried Chicken on MLK Day an Act of Racism?”

Remember the hate crimes law. We haven’t even begun to see what is going to happen in this country.

Glad I read the description of your BRO meal, after my t-bone and baked tater, otherwise I would have been drooling on my keyboard.
A little tip, if you don’t already know, if you want fresh whole catfish to cook for dinner, go to your nearest Oriental Market. They will have them in a tank, and will even clean them for you, if you want. At least they do here in Dallas.
As for fried chicken being racist, how absurd. The next thing you know, potatoes O’brien and Hungarian Goulash will be fighting words.

As for fried chicken being racist, how absurd. The next thing you know, potatoes O’brien and Hungarian Goulash will be fighting words.

Reading this is so exasperating. Can I recommend going to the library and looking at some Jim Crow-era pop culture in which black people are depicted as watermelon, chicken-eating buffoons? Just because you’re ignorant of the connotations doesn’t mean they don’t exist.

Judging from the description of this particular incident I doubt that any offense was intended but your ahistorical, rose-tinted view of the world is too sweet even for Valentines Day.

Preston — either the act of serving/eating fried chicken is or is not racist. I think it is not.

It’s food.

I don’t need historical context to let me know that it’s okay to serve and eat fried chicken at any and every occasion.

Now maybe if the white servers were dressed in blackface (a very common photoshopping trick of lefty bloggers), then it would be racist.

What’s racist about blackface- it’s just make-up. If there is a century of racist connotations to it that’s just the problem of the race hustlers.

Sure. You can play that game.

But if I eat fried chicken or serve fried chicken — regardless of what day of the year it is — I’m not a racist, nor is it a racist act. In any way.

But if I decided to put on Black Face — regardless of the day of year — it’s an idiotic, bigoted act of racism. I wouldn’t do it.

But I will stop by Popeye’s on the way home for a bucket of extra-spicy. Don’t tell the Rev. Al Sharpton.

I find it unbelievable that you don’t understand that context makes a difference- I’m confident that every day you take the context of a message into account when interpreting it. For instance, if we’re having a beer and I laugh while saying “you asshole” you can conclude I’m probably not too upset and I regard you as a pretty close friend. If instead you step in front of me in line at the grocery store and I say “you asshole” things might get heated. So no, it is not racist to eat fried chicken- unless you are attempting to perpetuate racial stereotypes while doing it.

In any case, for someone who is so conscious of the impact of symbols are you aware that your decision to recognize that symbolism is somewhat arbitrary?

Apparently, wearing a lapel pin or putting your and over your heart instead of singing the national anthem is very important.

Insulting the Prophet of your religion- not so important.

I think you are aware of the power of symbolism you just aren’t overly concerned with offending Muslims or black people.

Ok, the context is that a black man served fried chicken on MLK day. And he had to apologize for his racial insensitive.

I call bullshit. Serving fried chicken is not a racist act. Not in this drummed-up context, not in any other.

Agree to disagree.

Got something you want to say?

Quicktags:


Notes:

You have 10 minutes after you submit your comment to edit it. Simply click the E(dit) link above the countdown-counter at the bottom of your comment. You can only edit a comment from the same IP address from where the original comment was submitted.

If your comment does not appear immediately, it has been sent to the moderation queue for approval.

Your comment either contained more than 2 hyperlinks, or it used a word(s) that are on my Spam blacklist. Comments awaiting moderation will usually be approved within a day.

And, being that it's my blog and all...I reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.