<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FISA — A Win for America = A Loss for Democrats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://urbangrounds.com/2008/02/fisa-amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2008/02/fisa-amendment/</link>
	<description>Sometimes the truth hurts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:19:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neocon News</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2008/02/fisa-amendment/#comment-129875</link>
		<dc:creator>Neocon News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2008/02/12/fisa-amendment/#comment-129875</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;FISA victory round up. Dem amendments fail, cloture invoked....&lt;/strong&gt;

Story &amp; updates here.
Graphic to annoy Harry Reid here:

Round up reaction here:
Michelle Malkin Nutroots lose, America wins.
JustOneMinute FISA Follies.
American Pundit Senate Rejects Feingold FISA Amendment.
Protein Wisdom One small step for the ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>FISA victory round up. Dem amendments fail, cloture invoked&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Story &amp; updates here.<br />
Graphic to annoy Harry Reid here:</p>
<p>Round up reaction here:<br />
Michelle Malkin Nutroots lose, America wins.<br />
JustOneMinute FISA Follies.<br />
American Pundit Senate Rejects Feingold FISA Amendment.<br />
Protein Wisdom One small step for the &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: no2liberals</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2008/02/fisa-amendment/#comment-129854</link>
		<dc:creator>no2liberals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2008/02/12/fisa-amendment/#comment-129854</guid>
		<description>No, John Boehner is on the correct side of history:


&lt;blockquote&gt;    It speaks volumes about the national security priorities of congressional Democrats that they have failed to permanently close the terrorist loophole. And it certainly speaks volumes that they have failed to do so because they have bowed to the demands of those on the Left seeking to derail common sense terrorist surveillance laws that would help keep our country safe from attack.

    With the deadline coming this Saturday, will Democratic leaders finally work with Republicans to permanently close the terrorist loophole in our nationâ€™s terrorist surveillance laws and extend appropriate liability protections for third parties who have stepped up to the plate in the interest of our national security? Or will the Majorityâ€™s allies on the Left demand that Congress backs down from this responsibility once again, kicking the can even farther down the road while the safety of Americans at home and abroad hangs in the balance?&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, John Boehner is on the correct side of history:</p>
<blockquote><p>    It speaks volumes about the national security priorities of congressional Democrats that they have failed to permanently close the terrorist loophole. And it certainly speaks volumes that they have failed to do so because they have bowed to the demands of those on the Left seeking to derail common sense terrorist surveillance laws that would help keep our country safe from attack.</p>
<p>    With the deadline coming this Saturday, will Democratic leaders finally work with Republicans to permanently close the terrorist loophole in our nationâ€™s terrorist surveillance laws and extend appropriate liability protections for third parties who have stepped up to the plate in the interest of our national security? Or will the Majorityâ€™s allies on the Left demand that Congress backs down from this responsibility once again, kicking the can even farther down the road while the safety of Americans at home and abroad hangs in the balance?</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2008/02/fisa-amendment/#comment-129846</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2008/02/12/fisa-amendment/#comment-129846</guid>
		<description>Obama is on the right side of history here:

&quot;I am proud to stand with Senator Dodd, Senator Feingold and a grassroots movement of Americans who are refusing to let President Bush put protections for special interests ahead of our security and our liberty. There is no reason why telephone companies should be given blanket immunity to cover violations of the rights of the American people â€“ we must reaffirm that no one in this country is above the law.

We can give our intelligence and law enforcement community the powers they need to track down and take out terrorists without undermining our commitment to the rule of law, or our basic rights and liberties. That is why I am proud to cosponsor several amendments that protect our privacy while making sure we have the power to track down and take out terrorists.

This Administration continues to use a politics of fear to advance a political agenda. It is time for this politics of fear to end. We are trying to protect the American people, not special interests like the telecommunications industry. We are trying to ensure that we don&#039;t sacrifice our liberty in pursuit of security, and it is past time for the Administration to join us in that effort.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is on the right side of history here:</p>
<p>&#8220;I am proud to stand with Senator Dodd, Senator Feingold and a grassroots movement of Americans who are refusing to let President Bush put protections for special interests ahead of our security and our liberty. There is no reason why telephone companies should be given blanket immunity to cover violations of the rights of the American people â€“ we must reaffirm that no one in this country is above the law.</p>
<p>We can give our intelligence and law enforcement community the powers they need to track down and take out terrorists without undermining our commitment to the rule of law, or our basic rights and liberties. That is why I am proud to cosponsor several amendments that protect our privacy while making sure we have the power to track down and take out terrorists.</p>
<p>This Administration continues to use a politics of fear to advance a political agenda. It is time for this politics of fear to end. We are trying to protect the American people, not special interests like the telecommunications industry. We are trying to ensure that we don&#8217;t sacrifice our liberty in pursuit of security, and it is past time for the Administration to join us in that effort.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: no2liberals</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2008/02/fisa-amendment/#comment-129812</link>
		<dc:creator>no2liberals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2008/02/12/fisa-amendment/#comment-129812</guid>
		<description>Dang...31-67?
&lt;strong&gt;WHOO-HOO!&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dang&#8230;31-67?<br />
<strong>WHOO-HOO!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

