<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sharing Your Yard w/ 13 Other Families</title>
	<atom:link href="http://urbangrounds.com/2008/02/housing-density/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2008/02/housing-density/</link>
	<description>Off-the-cuff commentary on the day&#039;s events</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:59:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vic</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2008/02/housing-density/#comment-136133</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2008/02/21/housing-density/#comment-136133</guid>
		<description>Why is the editor putting his neo-con two cents in?  The editor should be objective; not bias.  Ugh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is the editor putting his neo-con two cents in?  The editor should be objective; not bias.  Ugh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2008/02/housing-density/#comment-131918</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2008/02/21/housing-density/#comment-131918</guid>
		<description>Actually, we moved from another town.   

I think the whole point of that comment was to acknowledge- not deny- the economic and racial inequity of current housing, educational, and taxation systems.  

Luckily, my parents were a position to offer me the best (public) education available in town.  I don&#039;t feel guilty about that but I do feel an obligation to point out that this system does not serve all Americans equally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, we moved from another town.   </p>
<p>I think the whole point of that comment was to acknowledge- not deny- the economic and racial inequity of current housing, educational, and taxation systems.  </p>
<p>Luckily, my parents were a position to offer me the best (public) education available in town.  I don&#8217;t feel guilty about that but I do feel an obligation to point out that this system does not serve all Americans equally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2008/02/housing-density/#comment-131910</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2008/02/21/housing-density/#comment-131910</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I know that growing up my parents chose to move to a (98% white) suburb in order to get me a better education than we would have gotten if we had been 2 miles away across the county line.&lt;/em&gt;

This is liberal speak for:  Minorities were moving in and we got the hell out of dodge!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I know that growing up my parents chose to move to a (98% white) suburb in order to get me a better education than we would have gotten if we had been 2 miles away across the county line.</em></p>
<p>This is liberal speak for:  Minorities were moving in and we got the hell out of dodge!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: no2liberals</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2008/02/housing-density/#comment-131639</link>
		<dc:creator>no2liberals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 01:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2008/02/21/housing-density/#comment-131639</guid>
		<description>Preston, maybe you should do some research on your own, without relying on others to provide you links, you lazy asshole.  &lt;strong&gt;All &lt;/strong&gt;of our coastal drilling is banned except for a tiny section of the Gulf of Mexico.  The tiny section they want to drill in ANWR is but a drop in the bucket, compared to what is available in that state.
I&#039;ve had issues with zoning commissions and appraisal districts, different results are to be expected, which is why those local elections are so important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Preston, maybe you should do some research on your own, without relying on others to provide you links, you lazy asshole.  <strong>All </strong>of our coastal drilling is banned except for a tiny section of the Gulf of Mexico.  The tiny section they want to drill in ANWR is but a drop in the bucket, compared to what is available in that state.<br />
I&#8217;ve had issues with zoning commissions and appraisal districts, different results are to be expected, which is why those local elections are so important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2008/02/housing-density/#comment-131614</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2008/02/21/housing-density/#comment-131614</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;We have plenty of petroleum of our own&lt;/em&gt;
Do actually believe what you write or is it just good propaganda?  I assume you&#039;re talking about &lt;a href=&quot;tonto.eia.doe.gov/ftproot/service/sroiaf(2004)04.pdf &quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ANWR&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;em&gt;Opening the coastal plain of ANWR is projected to reduce 2025 oil import dependence from &lt;strong&gt;70 percent &lt;/strong&gt;in the AEO2004 reference case to &lt;strong&gt;66 percent &lt;/strong&gt;in the mean resource case.&lt;/em&gt;

&lt;em&gt;Current policies tend to follow what most people want. &lt;/em&gt;
You&#039;re idealism is refreshing.  Maybe Dianne can educate you about who calls the shots in zoning board hearings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>We have plenty of petroleum of our own</em><br />
Do actually believe what you write or is it just good propaganda?  I assume you&#8217;re talking about <a href="tonto.eia.doe.gov/ftproot/service/sroiaf(2004)04.pdf " rel="nofollow">ANWR</a>:</p>
<p><em>Opening the coastal plain of ANWR is projected to reduce 2025 oil import dependence from <strong>70 percent </strong>in the AEO2004 reference case to <strong>66 percent </strong>in the mean resource case.</em></p>
<p><em>Current policies tend to follow what most people want. </em><br />
You&#8217;re idealism is refreshing.  Maybe Dianne can educate you about who calls the shots in zoning board hearings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: no2liberals</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2008/02/housing-density/#comment-131603</link>
		<dc:creator>no2liberals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2008/02/21/housing-density/#comment-131603</guid>
		<description>Your thinking is a bit to bizarre for my taste.
Current policies tend to follow what most people want.  One dingus trying to tell what most people are required to accept is anathema, and Soviet style.
We have plenty of petroleum of our own, we just need to change the wacko policies that prevent us from extracting it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your thinking is a bit to bizarre for my taste.<br />
Current policies tend to follow what most people want.  One dingus trying to tell what most people are required to accept is anathema, and Soviet style.<br />
We have plenty of petroleum of our own, we just need to change the wacko policies that prevent us from extracting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2008/02/housing-density/#comment-131593</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2008/02/21/housing-density/#comment-131593</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;There have always been those entities in my lifetime, and always will be. &lt;/em&gt;

Exactly my point.

You&#039;ve been thrilled to have government using it&#039;s power to prevent, say, a man from building an apartment building on his own land next door to your house.  But when someone suggests that we should pursue policies that contribute to the preservation of farmland and wildlife and the reduction of petroleum dependency you decry those governmental tools as &#039;Soviet&#039;.  

Your passion for liberty is a bit fickle for my taste.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>There have always been those entities in my lifetime, and always will be. </em></p>
<p>Exactly my point.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve been thrilled to have government using it&#8217;s power to prevent, say, a man from building an apartment building on his own land next door to your house.  But when someone suggests that we should pursue policies that contribute to the preservation of farmland and wildlife and the reduction of petroleum dependency you decry those governmental tools as &#8216;Soviet&#8217;.  </p>
<p>Your passion for liberty is a bit fickle for my taste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: no2liberals</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2008/02/housing-density/#comment-131575</link>
		<dc:creator>no2liberals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2008/02/21/housing-density/#comment-131575</guid>
		<description>Preston, give it a rest.  There have always been those entities in my lifetime, and always will be.  That doesn&#039;t mean I have to submit to living the way this dingus suggests.
My sanctum sanctorum, which is where I will retire to, is in an unincorporated area, with only the county and ISD to contend with, and those government entities are stacked with old friends and like minded people.  If I want to go outside and have target practice, start a bonfire, I just do it, unless the county has declared a burn ban.
I tolerate city life, for now, as it is profitable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Preston, give it a rest.  There have always been those entities in my lifetime, and always will be.  That doesn&#8217;t mean I have to submit to living the way this dingus suggests.<br />
My sanctum sanctorum, which is where I will retire to, is in an unincorporated area, with only the county and ISD to contend with, and those government entities are stacked with old friends and like minded people.  If I want to go outside and have target practice, start a bonfire, I just do it, unless the county has declared a burn ban.<br />
I tolerate city life, for now, as it is profitable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
