<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Bet Obama Wishes Jeremiah Wright Would Just STFU Already</title>
	<atom:link href="http://urbangrounds.com/2008/04/wright-difference-between-white-black/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2008/04/wright-difference-between-white-black/</link>
	<description>Off-the-cuff commentary on the day&#039;s events</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:33:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2008/04/wright-difference-between-white-black/#comment-134907</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2008/04/28/wright-difference-between-white-black/#comment-134907</guid>
		<description>Right - the coporate media laps up and spews Drudgian talking points verbatim so they can&#039;t be accused of being libruls by right-wing bloviators.   As Mark Halperin of Politico.com (formerly head of ABC News) said, &quot;Drudge rules our world now...&quot;

Just four recent examples of why McCain calls the media his &quot;base:&quot;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=5D3BD52C-3048-5C12-006CDB53E3EDBB01
McCain will rely on free media to an unprecedented degree to get out his message in a fashion that aims to not only minimize his financial disadvantage but also drive a triangulated contrast among himself, the Democratic nominee and President Bush.


The Hill&#039;s A.B. Stoddard: &quot;I think that if Barack Obama had confused Sunni and Shia, Al Qaeda, et cetera, it would have been a disaster. He would have been Mr. Green, wet behind the ears, can&#039;t find his way around.&quot; She added, &quot;If Hillary Clinton had done so, it would have been, &#039;Oh, that poor first lady. She&#039;s just trying so hard to pretend that she could be president, but it&#039;s not going to work.&#039; I think the problem for John McCain is that we assume that he knows his stuff, that he&#039;s Mr. National Security, so we say, &#039;It couldn&#039;t be an indication of his ignorance. He must be tired.&#039; &quot;
[â€¦]
PolitiFact.com -- a website operated by the St. Petersburg Times and Congressional Quarterly claiming &quot;to help voters separate fact from falsehood in the 2008 presidential campaign&quot; -- seemed to apologize for having to correct McCain: &quot;We&#039;re not trying to pile on to Sen. John McCain over his misstatement on the link between Iran and al-Qaida. Maybe he was confused just for a moment. He did correct himself quickly.&quot;
{â€¦}
And CNBC&#039;s John Harwood asserted: &quot;I think that at the end of the day, John McCain has got sufficient credibility on that issue that people are not going to look at that and say, &#039;Oh, John McCain&#039;s confused&#039; or &#039;John McCain&#039;s too old&#039; or &#039;John McCain doesn&#039;t get it.&#039; ... But he obviously can&#039;t do that too many times or he&#039;s got a problem.&quot;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right &#8211; the coporate media laps up and spews Drudgian talking points verbatim so they can&#8217;t be accused of being libruls by right-wing bloviators.   As Mark Halperin of Politico.com (formerly head of ABC News) said, &#8220;Drudge rules our world now&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Just four recent examples of why McCain calls the media his &#8220;base:&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>
<a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=5D3BD52C-3048-5C12-006CDB53E3EDBB01" rel="nofollow">http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=5D3BD52C-3048-5C12-006CDB53E3EDBB01</a><br />
McCain will rely on free media to an unprecedented degree to get out his message in a fashion that aims to not only minimize his financial disadvantage but also drive a triangulated contrast among himself, the Democratic nominee and President Bush.</p>
<p>The Hill&#8217;s A.B. Stoddard: &#8220;I think that if Barack Obama had confused Sunni and Shia, Al Qaeda, et cetera, it would have been a disaster. He would have been Mr. Green, wet behind the ears, can&#8217;t find his way around.&#8221; She added, &#8220;If Hillary Clinton had done so, it would have been, &#8216;Oh, that poor first lady. She&#8217;s just trying so hard to pretend that she could be president, but it&#8217;s not going to work.&#8217; I think the problem for John McCain is that we assume that he knows his stuff, that he&#8217;s Mr. National Security, so we say, &#8216;It couldn&#8217;t be an indication of his ignorance. He must be tired.&#8217; &#8221;<br />
[â€¦]<br />
PolitiFact.com &#8212; a website operated by the St. Petersburg Times and Congressional Quarterly claiming &#8220;to help voters separate fact from falsehood in the 2008 presidential campaign&#8221; &#8212; seemed to apologize for having to correct McCain: &#8220;We&#8217;re not trying to pile on to Sen. John McCain over his misstatement on the link between Iran and al-Qaida. Maybe he was confused just for a moment. He did correct himself quickly.&#8221;<br />
{â€¦}<br />
And CNBC&#8217;s John Harwood asserted: &#8220;I think that at the end of the day, John McCain has got sufficient credibility on that issue that people are not going to look at that and say, &#8216;Oh, John McCain&#8217;s confused&#8217; or &#8216;John McCain&#8217;s too old&#8217; or &#8216;John McCain doesn&#8217;t get it.&#8217; &#8230; But he obviously can&#8217;t do that too many times or he&#8217;s got a problem.&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2008/04/wright-difference-between-white-black/#comment-134906</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2008/04/28/wright-difference-between-white-black/#comment-134906</guid>
		<description>What are you? Gleen Greenwald&#039;s butt boy? Both of you must be on crack. The MSM is so in the tank for Obama it&#039;s ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are you? Gleen Greenwald&#8217;s butt boy? Both of you must be on crack. The MSM is so in the tank for Obama it&#8217;s ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2008/04/wright-difference-between-white-black/#comment-134904</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2008/04/28/wright-difference-between-white-black/#comment-134904</guid>
		<description>Sorry - clipped the attribution -  http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry &#8211; clipped the attribution &#8211;  <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/" rel="nofollow">http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://urbangrounds.com/2008/04/wright-difference-between-white-black/#comment-134903</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbangrounds.com/2008/04/28/wright-difference-between-white-black/#comment-134903</guid>
		<description>When the Right and the media assumed that Hillary Clinton was the inevitable nominee and that Obama couldn&#039;t win, the Right just &quot;loved&quot; Obama, and people like The New Republic&#039;s Jason Zengerle marveled at what they actually believed was the astonishing (and real) phenomenon that no &quot;conservative writer [is] able to withstand Obama&#039;s charms.&quot; Now that it appears that Obama rather than Clinton will likely be the nominee, that has, quite predictably, reversed itself completely: suddenly the Right hates Obama and has great respect for Hillary Clinton. 

And, as always, the media follows along exactly the same path. When it looked to them as though Hillary would win, the media hated her and was largely deferential to Obama. Now, the reverse is true. As Thomas Edsall wrote last week: &quot;In a blink of an eye, the media has jumped ship from the Obama campaign and become a crucial Clinton ally.&quot; One can trace the media&#039;s complete reversal regarding Obama to exactly the moment when it appeared he would actually win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the Right and the media assumed that Hillary Clinton was the inevitable nominee and that Obama couldn&#8217;t win, the Right just &#8220;loved&#8221; Obama, and people like The New Republic&#8217;s Jason Zengerle marveled at what they actually believed was the astonishing (and real) phenomenon that no &#8220;conservative writer [is] able to withstand Obama&#8217;s charms.&#8221; Now that it appears that Obama rather than Clinton will likely be the nominee, that has, quite predictably, reversed itself completely: suddenly the Right hates Obama and has great respect for Hillary Clinton. </p>
<p>And, as always, the media follows along exactly the same path. When it looked to them as though Hillary would win, the media hated her and was largely deferential to Obama. Now, the reverse is true. As Thomas Edsall wrote last week: &#8220;In a blink of an eye, the media has jumped ship from the Obama campaign and become a crucial Clinton ally.&#8221; One can trace the media&#8217;s complete reversal regarding Obama to exactly the moment when it appeared he would actually win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
