Search

The Democratically controlled Congress has proposed a bill to increase GI Bill benefits for veterans. This is, on the face, a good thing.

President Bush has threatened to veto the bill, and my Congressman (Mike McCaul, R–TX10) and Senator (John Cornyn, R–TX) both voted against its passage.

Democrats and the Left-o-sphere are spinning the veto and votes against as Republicans not wanting to increase benefits. Some are being even more dishonest than that and are trying to spin it as though Republicans are trying to repeal the entire GI Bill by not funding it at all.

But the truth is that the GOP has proposed their own increase and expansion of GI and educational benefits for Veterans. Except — unlike the Donk’s bill — the GOP actually listened to what Soldiers and veterans most wanted to see in an expanded GI Bill. And they talked to the head of the VA — who said that the Donk’s version of the bill would not be the best way to help veterans.

The number one thing that Soldiers and Veterans want (and have always wanted) in the GI Bill is transferability.

And the GOP pushed to make sure that veterans would be allowed to transfer part or all of their GI Bill benefit to their spouse and/or children.

But the Donks were having none of it and refused to include it.

The truth is, that the current amounts provided by the GI Bill are in almost all cases more than enough to pay for for a full degree at almost any public university in America.

Michelle Malkin has the NY Times column, which spins and lies about the GOP’s role in increasing GI Bill benefits. She also has the White House response.

________

I called my brother, who is the NCOIC in charge of all instructors at the US Army Recruiting School in Ft. Jackson, SC, to talk to him about his thoughts on this.

He agreed that the number one thing that Soldiers want — especially ones that have been in long enough to have re-enlisted — is the ability to transfer their benefit to their spouse or children.

Case in point — my brother will retire from the US Army in 2011. He will already have a Bachelor’s degree, which was paid for via the U.S. Army’s Tuition Assistance Program (TAP). The TAP provides up to $4500 per year in tuition assistance to any active duty soldier.

So, when he retires at the ripe “old age” of 39-years old, he’ll have a Bachelors degree in Business Administration and Finance, and 20-years of exceptional real-world experience.

He’ll start into his next career immediately and the chance of him using his GI Bill within the 10-year expiration period are slim-to-none.

His wife, on the other hand, is currently paying for a college class here-and-there, trying to earn a degree in Education so she can become a school teacher once my brother retires from the Army.

The military does not provide any assistance to her at all.

It would be a tremendous benefit if his GI Bill benefits were transferable to his wife. But they’re not.

And they should be.

Because part of the GI Bill is funded by the Soldiers themselves. When you join the Army, if you want the GI Bill, you have to explicitly sign-up for it. And then the Army deducts $100/month from your check for the first year of your enlistment.

$100/month might not sound like much. But I was just looking at an old LES from when I was an E-3 in the Army. And my monthly take home pay was $635.

A month.

That extra $100/month was huge back then.

Which leads me to the second thing that Soldiers would like to change about the GI Bill: quit making Soldiers pay for it. It should be a benefit that is 100% free to all Soldiers the moment they are sworn in.

_____________

So when you hear Dems,  Lefty-bloggers, and media pundits saying that the GOP doesn’t want to increase the GI Bill benefits, understand that they are lying.

The difference between the GI Bill bills being proposed by each side is this: the GOP bill is based on the feedback of Soldiers and the VA itself. The Donks bill is based on their own political posturing and does not best address the needs of todays soldiers and tomorrows veterans.

4 Responses to “Expanding GI Bill Benefits”

Those of us who entered the service prior to (IIRC) 1986 had a free GI bill, so it’s not a radical idea.

When I retired in 1994 I went to one semester of graduate school (which I hated) and then went into the private sector. When the ten year clock ran out in 2004 I had something like 30 months of unused GI bill, and two kids in college. It would have been great to pass some of that GI bill to my kids.

Valid point Robbie, and I’m glad to see someone standing up against the Donk’s on this issue. Have you seen the interview where Larry Joe Doherty bashes your Congressman on this issue on thetexasblue.com? If only they knew the truth in the matter, and where the Congressman from Texas District 10 stood on the issue and why he will not vote for $10 Billion in small business taxes.

There are various options for higher education within the Active Military that are not being talked about within the context of this debate. Thanks to Robbie for bringing them up. As a former Army Officer and NCO, I know how little is known about these programs even within the ranks. There are however, a few points that should be clarified. The Graham/Burr bill still requires soldiers to buy in to the system, while the Webb/Hagel bill eliminates the buy in entirely. Transferability is currently authorized per the defense authorization act of 2001. While it is limited to critical MOS only, it has only been used 200 (out of 17,000 eligible) times in the last 7 years. It is a good idea that Sen Warner R-VA (GI Bill co-sponsor) has introduced as an amendment to the GI Bill. Also, it is important to note that Sen. Webb’s bill has more Republican co-sponsors (1/3 of House GOP & 11 GOP Sen) than the competing bill has total sponsors. Half of the GOP in the Senate voted for it on the floor. It is also important to realize that all of the major Veteran’s organizations have endorsed the GI Bill and do not support the competing bill. For once, this is an idea that had not been hatched from the loony-left or the hard right. It’s in fact, a true effort by leaders in both parties to do the right thing.

The republicans don’t want a GI Bill because they’d lose the cannon fodder they need for their endless wars of aggression to the pointy-heads in academia. Actions speak louder than words, and the record is clear: the GOP has demonstrated time and again throughout this war that they don’t give a damn about a soldier once he’s been discharged. See: Walter Reed, GI Bill, etc….

Got something you want to say?

Quicktags:


Notes:

You have 10 minutes after you submit your comment to edit it. Simply click the E(dit) link above the countdown-counter at the bottom of your comment. You can only edit a comment from the same IP address from where the original comment was submitted.

If your comment does not appear immediately, it has been sent to the moderation queue for approval.

Your comment either contained more than 2 hyperlinks, or it used a word(s) that are on my Spam blacklist. Comments awaiting moderation will usually be approved within a day.

And, being that it's my blog and all...I reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.