During John McCain’s recent trip to Iraq, Martha Raddatz of ABC News was polling Soldiers as to who they were going to vote for President.
Apparently she had to ask a whole lot of soldiers before she found a handful enough to fit her pre-written story and bias:
Seems a Soldier who was standing behind Raddatz as she queried the soldiers kept count of who answered what:
She (Raddatz) asked 60 GI’s who they planned to vote for in November. 54 said John McCain, 4 for Obama and 2 for Hillary.
You would think that honest journalism would lead with a story about how an overwhelming majority of Soldiers will be voting — as they ALWAYS do — for the Republican candidate.
Nope. That doesn’t fit the media’s narrative. So instead the ABC News report decided to focus instead on:
ABC showed 5 GI’s being asked by Raddatz how they were going to vote in November; 3 for Obama and 2 for Clinton. No mention of the 54 for McCain. Coming from ABC, why am I not surprised!
She might as well have gone to MSNBC and asked, “How many of your political beat reporters would like to blow Barr Obama?” Because then at least they would have gotten a much more honest and accurate proportion of people raising their hand for Barry.






Wow, I only had that story up for a few minutes late last night before I had misgivings and took it down.
It’s totally plausable, and the article I dug up that Raddatz posted at ABC did correspond with Katelyn’s story in terms of the number of Obama supporters, indicated. And there was of course no mention of the 54 McCain supporters.
Still, without more confirmation about “Katelyn”’s story I didn’t feel confident enough to leave it up. Katelyn is basically an anonymous source.
It’s an explosive story, if true. I saved it, and might reword it. I’d certainly like to see that source come forward.
Left by Nice Deb on June 13th, 2008 at 11:38 am