I think it’s an outrage that black kids (and white kids, more outrageously) casually throw around that language- it makes them look like idiots.

But can’t you see the difference between ‘insiders’ using the language in one context as opposed to others using it in a derisive context?

Left by Preston on July 22nd, 2008 at 9:15 pm

I doubt his petition will be shut down due to death threats.
No Quarter.

By the way, someone set up a petition demanding to see Obama’s Birth Certificate, but that person shut down the petition after threats were directed at his/her family. I hope that Obama’s campaign had nothing to do with those threats.

The website for that petition was birthcertificatenow.com. Earlier Sunday, the link worked and there was a notation on the site that the petition had been closed due to threats. Later Sunday, the link led to a solid black page.

Left by no2liberals on July 22nd, 2008 at 9:44 pm

By the way, someone set up a petition demanding to see Obama’s Birth Certificate,

Where do these lunatics come from?

Remember to check the kerning, fellas!

Left by Preston on July 23rd, 2008 at 5:58 am

So if an issue threatens B-HO, the standard response is to call them names, then dismiss their efforts as lunacy. Unless you are referring to the lunatics that make death threats.
The question remains, why won’t B-HO produce a certified copy of his birth certificate? The fraudulent copy posted at FightTheSmear and Daily Kos only adds to the question.
Atlas Shrugs.

I have decided to leave out the low level technicalities and the how-to section of this report due to a lack of time and more importantly I want to get the facts out as quickly as possible. As some of you may or may not know some asshat decided to track me down and vandalize my car and hang a dead mutilated rabbit from my front door in a lame attempt to intimidate me from proceeding with releasing any details of my analysis. They did succeed in delaying the report by a few days but instead of deterring me they just really pissed me off. To their credit, if I had not taken a few days off from the analysis I would have missed the most damning piece of evidence – the remnants of the previous security border. So to the demented retard who slaughtered an animal to make a point – f*ck you and thank you. And because of the amazing number of violent psychopaths who seem to be drawn to this issue, I am not going to use or supply any details that can be used to identify the owners of the COLBS used in the analysis except for those which have already been publicly disclosed. If the owners want to come forward on their own that is entirely their decision. Now let’s get to the summarized report.

The Plot Thickens. State of Hawaii blocking access.

It is evident that, Ms. Okubo’s letter notwithstanding, § 338-18 DOES NOT PROHIBIT the State of Hawaii from making Mr. Obama’s birth certificate public for three reasons. First, because he is a presidential candidate the public has a vital interest in Mr. Obama’s birth certificate. The statute specifically permits divulging birth certificate information to anyone who has a vital interest in the information.

‘Late Registration’ & Out-of-State Births in Hawaii
This issue has been brewing for quite some time. Just because the LameStreamMedia, which is trying to get B-HO elected, doesn’t report it, doesn’t mean it isn’t important. Why won’t he produce a certified copy of his birth certificate? That’s the question, and until he does, there will remain a number of people who suspect he doesn’t meet the requirements of a being a U.S. citizen, and/or that he his mother was not married at the time. His wife, My Bell, has already stated in a Huff’N'Puff article, that she was unmarried when he was born, a link that I posted here on another thread, and would gladly reproduce.

Left by no2liberals on July 23rd, 2008 at 9:03 am

Israel Insider has done extensive research into the fraudulent birth certificate.
Here is part six, and the first five parts have links at the bottom of this page.
From part one of their investigation, is this:

The Obama campaign, however, has not even produced a paper version of this document, and indeed it does not even publish the high resolution version that appeared on the Daily Kos. It has not fulfilled the media’s persistent requests to produce the original Birth Certificate, or to respond to media questions about the birth certificate controversy.

What could be the Obama campaign’s motive for withholding the original birth certificate and passing off instead a crudely forged facsimile of a “Certification of Live Birth”?

Speculation in the blogosphere and mainstream media is rampant that the concealment is for one or more of the following reasons:

1. There is no proof that Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961.
2. The father listed on the birth certificate is not Barack Hussein Obama.
3. The father’s race is listed as something other than African, perhaps Muslim or Arab.
4. The mother was no longer at that time an American citizen.
5. The child’s name is not listed as Barack Hussein Obama II.

Jim Geraghty, reporting on the Campaign Spot blog of the National Review and one of the original writers on the controversy, cited the “rumor” that Obama was born not within the United States, but elsewhere, possibly Kenya.

Geraghty stated that “If Obama were born outside the United States, one could argue that he would not meet the legal definition of natural-born citizen — because U.S. law at the time of his birth required his natural-born parent (his mother) to have resided in the United States for ‘10 years, at least [f]ive of which had to be after the age of 16.’”

He then points out that Ann Dunham, Obama’s mother, was 18 when Obama was born “so she wouldn’t have met the requirement of five years after the age of 16.”

According to FindLaw.com, cited by Geraghty, the requirements that were in force from Dec. 24, 1952 to Nov. 13, 1986, encompassing the time of Obama’s birth, state, “If only one parent was a U.S. citizen at the time of your birth, that parent must have resided in the United States for at least 10 years, at least five of which had to be after the age of 16.”

Geraghty said the Obama campaign could “debunk” the rumors about his birth simply by releasing a copy of his birth certificate, but the campaign has so far chosen not to do that.

The seriousness of this latest controversy cannot be underestimated. Unlike the scandals related to Obama’s various associations with unsavory characters, or claims about his Muslim upbringing, the issue here relates to his citizenship and legal qualification to run for President of the United States.

One would have thought that the most basic documentary proof of the location and date of his birth should be a basic and non-controversial requirement for any presidential candidate, and part of the public record, much more so than one’s tax return or annual checkup. It is almost incomprehensible that they would withhold this information — unless there is something to hide.

The only lunacy I detect is, those who support and plan on voting for B-HO.

Left by no2liberals on July 23rd, 2008 at 9:13 am