Comments on: What Do Howard Stern and Rush Limbaugh Have in Common?

By: no2liberals

no2liberals — Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:42:18 +0000

Yeah, and not all data is accurate, and can be refuted, but I already know what the score is, so keep deluding yourself.
Here’s an easy test for you, as a lefty, do you favor affirmative action and set-asides? If you answer yes to one or both, yep, your a racist.

By: Jeff

Jeff — Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:03:49 +0000

Wow, Preston, thanks for proving that those without jobs prefer Kerry. Good one.

By: Preston

Preston — Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:26:02 +0000

The plural of anecdote is not data.

By: no2liberals

no2liberals — Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:28:32 +0000

Oh, come on Preston, you can do better than that. Lets just say that Hollywood is in the hip pocket of the donks. Then you have all the libs at google, Microsoft, Apple, Warren Buffet, and a host of Wall Street investor types, like the Gov. of New Jersey, and let’s not forget the pimp of the donk party, George Soros. That doesn’t even include the donks in Congress who are rolling in it, like Piglosi and Kennedy. If you had your way, you would have us believe everyone on the left has lint in their pockets.
As for the last part, they were donks, conservative donks, but donks nontheless. When I go back to visit my old home town, many of my child hood friends are still donks, even if they are legacy donks, and they vote donk, not GOP. They toss the N word around like it was going out of style, and is quite discomforting. They are more abundant than you realize, and the donk party is still the most racist of the two major parties.

By: Preston

Preston — Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:25:53 +0000

Honestly, why waste my time with facts that take 2 minutes to google.

VOTE BY INCOME BUSH KERRY NADER

Under $15,000 (8%) 36% 63% 0%
$15-30,000 (15%) 42% 57% 0%
$30-50,000 (22%) 49% 50% 0%
$50-75,000 (23%) 56% 43% 0%
$75-100,000 (14%) 55% 45% 0%
$100-150,000 (11%) 57% 42% 1%
$150-200,000 (4%) 58% 42% *
$200,000 or More (3%) 63% 35% 1%

Sort of an inverse relationship between income and the likelihood to vote Republican, huh?

That was so easy, I’ll return to your obfuscation on race and politics.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was not opposed most vigorously by Democrats or Republicans but by Southern conservatives:

The original House version:

* Southern Democrats: 7-87 (7%-93%)
* Southern Republicans: 0-10 (0%-100%)

* Northern Democrats: 145-9 (94%-6%)
* Northern Republicans: 138-24 (85%-15%)

The Senate version:

* Southern Democrats: 1-20 (5%-95%)
* Southern Republicans: 0-1 (0%-100%)

* Northern Democrats: 45-1 (98%-2%)
* Northern Republicans: 27-5 (84%-16%)

In 1964, these Southern conservatives were Democrats. In 2008, they are Republicans.

By: no2liberals

no2liberals — Sat, 26 Jul 2008 00:17:03 +0000

A multimillionaire come out in support of Republicans? Kind of a ‘dog bites man’ story, no?

HAH!
Keeping up the tired old lie that the GOP is the party of the rich, eh, Preston? Sort of like the lie that the donk’s are the patron saints of civil rights.
As for Stern, don’t know anything about the guy, other than what I’ve heard in the news. If this is his awakening, then good on him.

By: Preston

Preston — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:12:30 +0000

A multimillionaire come out in support of Republicans? Kind of a ‘dog bites man’ story, no?

By: Tom

Tom — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:05:25 +0000

When did Stern finally open his eyes? I haven’t listened to him in years.