Barry Obama has finally started meeting with our military leaders who are fighting the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
He might as well have stayed home, though. He had already made up his mind about the war a long time ago. He’s already decided that this war is unwinnable, and he just doesn’t have the stomach for it.
And now that he’s finally met our military leaders and heard their views and opinions on the status and success of the war? He finally admits what his poor judgement clouded from him up until…well, just now: “that the surge in Iraq has been a success. That is has drastically reduced violence and given Iraq a shot at a bright future.”
So knowing now that we are winning and that the surge was the right and moral thing to do — Obama still says he would not have supported it knowing then what he knows now.
Which makes him an idiot of colossal proportions.
As Power Line notes, Senator Obama would rather lose the war than lose an election. Which makes him a pathetic, small, politics-as-usual egomaniac.
The man genuinely cares more about his own self-advancement and political gain than he does about the security of our nation and the freedom of oppressed people elsewhere.
And if you vote for him, so do you.
_________
MORE
Riehl World View:
Obama’s reprehensible, ill-informed and misleading comments regarding Iraq – and specifically the surge – may qualify him as the first genuinely un-American presidential nominee in history. It’s impossible to define a man who would attempt to gain the office of Commander-In-Chief by losing an American war an American. Evidently Obama’s upbringing instilled in him nothing of the best of American tradition. He’s, purely and simply, a total sell-out – all ego and ambition, with no realistic positive vision for America at all.





freedom of oppressed people elsewhere.
Those oppressed people would like the United States to end its occupation, thank you very much.
They are not occupied, and their oppressor is dead.
Exactly what conditions would constitute a victory? I find it amusing that those who’ve never served consistently harp on the “cut and runners” and “defeatists” yet the blogger here, having served the USA in uniform still agrees with a war that doesn’t have a clear objective, a defined set of conditions for victory, and was initiated based on a pack of lies. If any reader could quantify what exactly is the objective here? Other than to appease Israeli firsters and dual citizen nationals and their quest for the reopening of the Mosul to Haifa oil pipeline, what exactly is the point at which America first yet pro war folks will declare victory?
Woody,
That’s an easy one.
So far, violence in Iraq is down 90% since the surge began, and 12 of 15 political benchmarks have been met.
That’s to address the only serious part of your comment, your other grousing is your’s to deal with.
This is too good!
Of course B-HO had his summer camp visit in Amman today, and there are lots of edited video clips of him speaking there, but the real story is what got edited out.
From Rush Limbaugh’s show today.
So much for the great orator.
Unless that was what was appearing on his teleprompters.
Thanks for the link no2liberals, but the White House definitions for victory are extremely vague and ambiguous, leaving the possibility of a never ending occupation. Which is exactly what the kosher conservatives want. Maybe a better question to ask is, what are the united states of America’s vital interest in that region? To fight terrorist? You do know the southern border is pretty much unprotected don’t you?
Woody
Woody, the goals in that link are the official position, and are quite clear. Our continued presence may be needed for some time, after all, we are still in Japan and Germany, sixty three years later.
I’m not going to play your little game of shifting goal posts all over the globe. Any reasonable person can see the gains that have been made in Iraq, and a stable Iraq is in our national interest, as well as the ME’s, and the world’s.