Search

Yes, you read the title correctly, we can learn something beneficial from the U.K.
How, you ask?
I’ll let Rep. Tancredo explain:

Amid disturbing revelations that the verdicts of Islamic Sharia courts are now legally binding in civil cases in the United Kingdom, U.S. Representative Tom Tancredo (R-Littleton) moved quickly today to introduce legislation designed to protect the United States from a similar fate.

According to recent news reports, a new network of Sharia courts in a half-dozen major cities in the U.K. have been empowered under British law to adjudicate a wide variety of legal cases ranging from divorces and financial disputes to those involving domestic violence.

His legislation, the ‘Jihad Prevention Act,’ would operate thusly:

…bar the entry of foreign nationals who advocate Sharia law. In addition, the legislation would make the advocacy of Sharia law by radical Muslims already in the United States a deportable offense.

This is an outstanding piece of legislation by the Congressman, one that should get more attention, and that each reader should follow up on by contacting their own Representative, and Senators. I certainly will.
JUST SAY NO TO SHARIA!

As for Rep. Tancredo’s legislation, consider it lesson learned.

7 Responses to “Rep. Tom Tancredo Has Proof! We Can Learn Something Beneficial From The U.K.”

Hmmm. How long before the brit buttboy goes off?

Don’t know…don’t care.
I’m particularly fond of the last paragraph in Rep. Tancredo’s statement.

BTW, anon, have you seen the updated burka? It’s in Farsi, but the video explains it well enough. It’s ideal for doctor visits, and such.

Well, speaking as the lefty-eurowennie-brit-buttboy (not heard so much childish name calling since nursery school!), this is something we should have had a year ago in the UK.
In fact, if you ever want to get educated on the ‘turning’ that happened here in the UK, listen to Enoch Powells ‘Rivers of Blood’ speech from the late 60’s (it’ll be on the net somewhere).

Instead of being ‘offended’ by his narrative, we should have actually took notice. Here we had a man of massive intellect pointing out the problems of cultural cohesion and he was labelled a racist from day one.
A racist is a racist. A racist is not someone with intellect who speaks about race issues to a majority of mono-brain cell citizens.

So no, this legislation seems to be fair as far as I can see.
It’s just a shame we didn’t have it in our country 20 years ago.

Jonny

Oh, and a big get better soon shout out to Travis Barker.

Jonny

You’re rotten No2…lol

So Dianne, does this mean you still aren’t ready for your burka?
/ :lol:

Muslims Against Sharia praise Congressman Tancredo’s initiative. We advocated similar measures in the past and fully support “Gihad Prevention Act”

“Any person from a country where a substantial part of the population is pro-Sharia should not be allowed in the West, not only as an immigrant, but even as a visitor with a few exceptions, i.e., political asylum or as a diplomat etc. … Every legal immigrant should be allowed to stay only if he/she did not display desire to establish a Sharia state in a host country. Any naturalized citizen who displays a desire to establish a Sharia state in a host country should have his/her citizenship revoked and promptly deported. I think the latter two groups is where the real danger lies.” Linda Ahmed, FrontPage Magazine, July 24, 2008

“Anyone who proclaims Islamic extremist views should be tried for sedition, since we are at war with radical Islam, or at the very least, promptly deported.” Khalim Massoud, FrontPage Magazine, September 9, 2008

http://muslimsagainstsharia.blogspot.com/2008/09/tancredo-proposes-anti-sharia-measure.html

Got something you want to say?

Quicktags:


Notes:

You have 10 minutes after you submit your comment to edit it. Simply click the E(dit) link above the countdown-counter at the bottom of your comment. You can only edit a comment from the same IP address from where the original comment was submitted.

If your comment does not appear immediately, it has been sent to the moderation queue for approval.

Your comment either contained more than 2 hyperlinks, or it used a word(s) that are on my Spam blacklist. Comments awaiting moderation will usually be approved within a day.

And, being that it's my blog and all...I reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.