Search

Are they Behind the Malicious and Deceptive Attacks on Gov. Palin?

UPDATE — Ethan Winners admits he produced and published the deliberately deceptive smear videos against Palin.

_______

After reading this exceptionally detailed report from Rusty Shackelford at The Jawa Report — I have zero doubt in my mind that Barack Obama, his campaign, and his dirty political machine are behind (to include the funding of) a malicious and lie-filled web-based smear campaign against Republican Vice Presidential nominee, Gov. Sarah Palin.

Go read it.

Read the entire thing. Then think about it. Then apply Occam’s razor. And tell me you come up with something different.

Liar.

What the story boils down to is this — a series of knowingly false (otherwise known as bold-faced lies) videos about Gov. Palin were were produced and wildly distributed in a fashion intended to be seen as a viral grassroots effort.

Except for the fact that the videos were professionally produced (and thus paid for) — a trick called astroturfing — by Ethan Winner of the Publicis Groupe (using the alias eswinner). Oh, and that it’s pretty easy to draw a near straight line to David “Astroturf” Axelrod….Obama’s chief media strategist.

And what’s the best indicator that this is shady and deceptive politics (from the agent of hope and change)? Because within minutes of the post Dr. Shackelford’s and Ace of Spades reports…the YouTube accounts of Mr. Winner and all of his sockpuppet aliases started to disappear.

Within minutes.

But, thankfully, all of the videos were backed up. Screen shots were taken of the accounts before they were wiped.

Dirty, dirty, dirty. And I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s something more than just a little illegal going on as well.

Federal election law requires that a disclaimer from those paying for campaign ads, “must appear on any “electioneering communication” and on any public communication by any person that expressly advocates the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate or solicits funds in connection with a federal election.”

Ironically enough, the inaptly-named Mr. Winner’s company, Winner & Associates, specializes in “crisis communication”. 

Ace mocks their business expertise:

I gotta tell you, you pulling the ads and your accounts down is, what is the phrase, consciousness of guilt. You realize you’ve pretty much scotched all the various “innocent mistake” defenses?

I’m convinced more than ever, that not only is Barack Obama a habitual liar who’ll do anything to get elected, but that he’s also one of the dirtiest — albeit savvy — politicians we’ve ever seen. He is the nearly perfect product of the corrupt Chicago Poltical Machine.

_______

OTHERS blogging on this story “so big and so harmful to THE ONE, that there’s no way the media will touch it”

Riehl World View — “it seems fair to ask if Obama funded or knowingly supported what amounts to the politics of personal destruction version Web 2.0 against Palin.”

Silent Running — “This has the potential to be larger than the revelation of Mary Mapes and Dan Rather cooking the Bush Guard story. These guys are hired guns, linkable directly back to the Obama campaign. And what’s better than a smoking gun? Spotting the guy with the trigger finger and gunpowder residue.”

Michelle Malkin — “Let me underline that: At some point between approx. 12 midnight - 2am Eastern, “eswinner” logged into his account and tried to erase all traces of the deceitful, Palin-bashing ad.”

Dr. Melissa Clouthier (at Right Wing News) — “For Obama to feign victimization is rich. He is turning out to be the most victimizing politician to roll through an American election.”

Soccer Dad — “Furthermore, even if there’s an inquiry, all Obama has to do is say that he didn’t authorize it and fire Axelrod.”

While it’s already quite crowded under the Obama Bus, I’m sure there’s room for Axelrod down there too.

And a whole lot more (though a consipucous-by-their-absence dearth of Liberal links ) at Memeorandum.

24 Responses to “Barack Obama and David Axelrod — Spreading Lies”

Q: What is a liberal?

A: A conservative who has been ripped off by Wall Street.

Q: What is a conservative?

A: A liberal who’s been mugged.

Robbie:

You may not believe me, but as a film student, I say with full confidence that this video is not necessarily “professionally” produced. Anyone with basic editing chops and FinalCutPro could churn something out like this in a couple of hours.

As far as the trail back to Ethan Winner…seems pretty fishy. I still don’t find any solid evidence linking it back to Obama, and JawaReport seems to agree, but they do use a lot of “you-be-the-judge” type rhetoric to reinforce that conclusion anyways.

Also, if you follow Occam’s razor, the simplest explanation would be that a bunch of pissed-off democrats made it, rather than the giant web of lies presented by the jawa report.

Just my two cents.

[Editor --- John, you may not have read yet, but Ethan Winner has released a statement that he did in fact produce and publish the videos. And that he did use a professional voice over actor, and that "he paid for it."

Uh huh. Sure he did. And, oddly enough the person on DailyKos who was "making it go viral" just happens to work 6 doors down from Winners and Associates. Nope. No connection there, I'm sure. None whatsoever.]

John, I won’t argue your points, they may be valid enough. Instead, I will ask you to consider the global warming debate (the one that has virtually disappeared from sight recently). Who was pushing the issue? Why did it command so much press? Why, when the data no longer added up was it suddenly called ‘climate change’? If you use a fair and open mind, use your experience on earth, you can you-be-the-judge and figure out where and why a thing is happening.

Robbie:

I’d agree with you that everything has an agenda behind it. You and I might differ on global warming (or “climate change”), and hey, I’m sure the Obama campaign loves the fact that this video came out…it’s just that my gut says they probably weren’t directly involved. It’s not that I think he’s above reproach, I mean, he’s a politician after all, but it’s just that I find it hard to believe that Obama’s political machine is dumb enough to hire someone who leaves such a sloppy trail.

For the record, the shift from “global warming” to “climate change” was not the result of the data not adding up as you suggest, but rather an attempt to repackage the issue into something more palatable by Frank Luntz (who you might remember as the mastermind of the “Contract With America”).

In addition to the “Straight Talk” memo that suggested switching from “global warming” to “climate change”, Luntz also wrote a memo called “The New American Lexicon” which used a similar tactic, changing “drilling for oil” to “exploring for energy”.

And then, of course, everybody started using it because people are impressionable idiots (that goes for both sides of the aisle, mind you). What are you gonna do?

http://outside.away.com/outside/features/200505/counter-enviroment-power-list-17.html

Robbie:

Also, I find it kind of telling that the Jawa Report article uses a lot of the same reasoning, logic, and rhetoric that you’ll find in Truther stuff like Loose Change and the like. Not that I’m saying their comparable (the Palin video is obviously much much more believable), but I see a whole lot of fishy-sounding coincidences and not a lot of hard fact-finding.

I remember watching a Penn & Teller “Bullshit!” on the 9/11 truther fad. They played a clip of a meeting in which some guy said “nothing can convince me that these attacks were the result of anything but a calculated move by our own government.” Or something to that effect. Penn Jillette bristled, claiming “A true skeptic doesn’t say he can’t be convinced. A true skeptic DEMANDS to be convinced.”

I’m just not convinced is all.

Hi again John, I am not Robbie. Also, I cannot compete with your vast knowledge. Of everything. Global Warming marched on for only one reason, True Believers. Not some ‘mastermind’, not some Triad. When the steam (pun certainly intended) ran out of global warming, the true believers just switched into climate change. Like climate change was something new. I remember (vaguely) as a elementary school kid, the science books scaring hell out of me talking about the coming next ice age. Like I was going to be around for it or something. Anywho, my point has nothing to do with GW or CC, my point is you must have a critical eye and yes, you be the judge, to understand where mass movements come from. I know you will take this simple argument and twist it around some ideology and some conspiracy but it is not necessary. I was young once also, thought the world needed saving. Go save your world, just don’t screw up mine.

Artruen:

Believe it or not, I can read right through your sarcasm. I think you’re a little confused as to where I stand on things…I’m not saying there’s any mass conspiracy. I’m not here to debate the existence of global warming, I’m just stating a fact: the gradual phasing out of the term “global warming” and the rise of the term “climate change” was suggested by Frank Luntz in his memo “Straight Talk” which was leaked to the press some time after its original publication. Go to the website and read the article.

If that’s too “conspiracy-theorish” for you, you can see Luntz himself talking about the change and defending it in chapter five of this Frontline video:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/persuaders/

PS: The relevant part of the above-mentioned video comes in at around 8:08 if you don’t want to sit through the first part.

This guy says he acted alone. Even if he didn’t, there will be a cover-up and the truth will never see the light of day.

Robbie:

If you’re going to tie it to Obama you’re going to need more than a few coincidences and gut feelings. You’re going to need facts. I would think someone as anti-truther as you wouldn’t stoop to their level of “fact-finding”.

Love your attempts to slime this investigation by all your stupid “anti-truther” comments. Do you really think you are fooling anyone? I wish I could say that you wouldn’t stoop to such a dumb and obvious ploy, but I can’t.

Well I looked at their client list and unfortuneately it would do me no good to contact any of them regarding the ethics of their PR firm. I did notice that one of their clients was however the Alaska Visitor Association or something like that. I sure hope they decide their money is better spent elsewhere.

Anon:

Maybe you can’t read very well. I’m as anti-truther as Robbie, if not more so. Going to a fairly liberal University I run into that shit all the time and it makes my blood boil. In case you’re still confused:

Truther=one who subscribes to the theory that the 9/11 terrorist attacks were in fact perpetrated by the American government

Anti-truther=myself, Robbie, and anybody else who thinks the above people are completely full of shit.

Watch Loose Change and then read the jawa report article and see if you notice any similarities in rhetoric and logic. You’ll be surprised at what you find.

Artruen:

Believe it or not, I can read right through your sarcasm

John, it is not sarcasm. I am telling you how I feel. Forget anything on PBS. Why on earth would I watch anything on PBS? PBS is the American voice of socialism.
You must have a critical eye. Not one wrapped up in ideology or ignorance.
Frank Luntz? Are you kidding me? If you go around using him to support any argument, and I mean this, you maybe ought to consider upping your meds………

Jarzemsky: I read fine. You appear to be the one confused. Anyone can see through your cheap smear tactics of comparing the Jawa Report and Robbie to the truther b.s. Give it up. You’re embarrassing yourself.

Am I in the fucking twilight zone? What the hell are either of you talking about?

Artruen: I was only making a comment for Robbie’s own edification: Frank Luntz was largely responsible for the shift in language from “global warming” to “climate change”. He’s championed these type of language shifts time and time again. In the video he takes full responsibility for it and defends it. I’m not using him to “support” any “liberal” argument.

Anon: I’m not comparing Robbie to truther BS. When did I ever say that? What is wrong with you? Are you really that stupid. I KNOW THAT TRUTHERS ARE WRONG. I KNOW ROBBIE DOESN’T BELIEVE IN THE 9/11 TRUTH MOVEMENT. PULL YOUR HEAD OUT OF YOUR ASS AND LEARN BASIC READING COMPREHENSION SKILLS.

Then maybe you can take a look at both pieces of media and realize that both use similar rhetoric and framing their arguments: that is, grouping lots of facts that aren’t necessarily connected together and then stepping back and allowing the audience to “fill in the blanks”. That’s not journalism. That’s not using facts to support your arguments. That’s barely even conjecture.

I was merely pointing out the similarities between the two disparate pieces of media, and how it doesn’t seem to me that Robbie should be so (rightly) critical of one (the truther movement) and so supportive of another (the jawa article).

Now, I know this is difficult, but take 10 deep breaths, read everything I said, make sure you understand it all, consult a dictionary for any big words, and then post your comment.

Jesus fucking Christ, if you’re going to try to insult me at least do me the courtesy of understanding what the hell I’m saying before you do it. I mean god DAMN.

John,
Ya notice how I went out of my way to avoid the personal insult thing in my posts? Like maybe the debate was good? But, so much for that. When I read (read reed) your shit for brains ideologue (see your dictionary) spew, I do take a deep breath. More like a sigh. Blind stupidity has no cure except maybe experience. Hopefully my words are small enough for you to understand. OK, I used the GW argument originally to draw out the leftist in you. I also figured the spoiled child syndrome would manifest itself. Follow me so far? When you do nothing but recite conspiracy theories and Talking points, ya sound like a political rube. One that cannot think for himself.
How is the thumbing through your Playskool Dictionary for WannaBe Reactionaries goin?
You need to step away from PBS, Kos, CNN, and X Box, pull your aluminum foil hat on a little tighter.
Now why do you speak to JC in the last paragraph? Was He taking part in the conversation? And you did say god damn. hmmmm.
Now, let me insult you. Your a punkasseddickface. Lets get back to the debate, shall we?
Truther? In my world, a truther is an America Hater. Simple. One would have to be to even conceive of such a nonsensical thought. Maybe someone wrapped up in guilt, or spoiled rotten, or never had to fight or serve for America. How could I know? I appreciate your attempts to equate the original post to truthing, but……..
Political operatives are a fact of life. This is what the original post is about. Any advantage in politics is going to be exploited. Problem is, it may come back and haunt a candidate if his operatives are operating contrary to the stated goal of the campaign. Or if they operate contrary to law. Or, as in this case, the campaign could be adversely affected if the source of the ‘grassroots’ is revealed. Ya following along here, little boy? Got the dikshunary out still?
So, it is.

oh yeah, you probably are in the twilight zone…….

Artruen:

Once again. Read the post.

I agree with you. Truthers and their “truth movement” are ridiculous, idiotic, lying, cowardly excuses for human beings. I hate them. I HATE THEM. I HATE TRUTHERS.

Do you have that right yet?

I’m NOT. Repeat NOT comparing Robbie’s post to “truthing”. All I observed was that the rhetoric used in both pieces of media are similar in that they both use a loose, disjointed “connect-the-dots” kind of logic that doesn’t have basis in actual evidence or fact (at least as far as linking the video directly to the Obama campaign).

As far as Frank Luntz. There is no conspiracy. Luntz not only admits, but CELEBRATES the switch from global warming to climate change. Watch the video. Watch the video. Watch. The. Video. You can see him speaking freely about it.

Oh, and if you want to pull out the dictionary once more, hiding your lack of argument behind personal attacks is known as an “ad hominem” argument. It’s a sure indication that someone doesn’t know what they’re talking about

clarification: in the phrase “pieces of media” above I’m referring to the jawa report article and truther media. NOT robbie’s post.

[Editor --- No worries, mate. I knew you weren't referring to me.]

Am I in the fucking twilight zone?

Well, you may be. But, Artruen and I are on planet Earth.

Are you really that stupid.

No, but, apparently you are. As I already pointed out, you are sliming the Jawa Report and Robbie by continually comparing and associating them with the truther nuts. It’s a common sleazy tactic with your ilk. Learn that in film school?

I would think someone as anti-truther as you wouldn’t stoop to their level of “fact-finding”.

Your implication is that robbie has stooped down to the level of the truthers by linking to this story. It’s obvious what you are doing and it is sleazy. Stop pretending it isn’t.

I’ll admit, I phrased that poorly. What I meant was I would hope that Robbie wouldn’t view this kind of rhetoric in one instance as passable (the jawa report) and stupid in another (truther stuff).

And what do you mean Sliming? Like jawa report and UrbanGrounds aren’t run by big boys who can handle people disagreeing with them?

It’s obvious that you’re cherrypicking select passages from my comments to prove (to who I don’t know) that I’m secretly out to bring down both sites from the inside. Just grow up, will you?

Got something you want to say?

Quicktags:


Notes:

You have 10 minutes after you submit your comment to edit it. Simply click the E(dit) link above the countdown-counter at the bottom of your comment. You can only edit a comment from the same IP address from where the original comment was submitted.

If your comment does not appear immediately, it has been sent to the moderation queue for approval.

Your comment either contained more than 2 hyperlinks, or it used a word(s) that are on my Spam blacklist. Comments awaiting moderation will usually be approved within a day.

And, being that it's my blog and all...I reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.