// you’re reading...

Stupid News

Perez Hilton is a Barrel-Scraping Fairy

Hot, hot, hot Conservative woman

Hot, hot, hot Conservative woman

So there’s a giant uproar over Miss California, Carrie Prejean, who came in second to Miss North Carolina, Kristen Dalton.

The uproar isn’t that Prejean only came in second, it’s that she had the temerity to admit that she is opposed to gay marriage.

Which has caused the collective Lunatic Liberal Left (LLL) to go ape-shit.

Miss California, Carrie Prejean, said “We live in a land where you can choose same-sex marriage or opposite. And you know what, I think in my country, in my family, I think that I believe that a marriage should be between a man and a woman. No offense to anybody out there, but that’s how I was raised.”

Again…why is the LLL so constantly shocked when Christians adhere to their Christian values on issues such as abortion, stem cell research, marriage, and homosexuality? Why do they feign such outrage when Christians say, “Hey, as a matter of my faith, I think homosexuality is wrong.”?

Anyway, the outrage is being led by some raging, no-talent ass-clown homo named Perez Hilton (Seriously? That’s what he calls himself?) who was a judge at the contest. Hilton went on a fairy-sized rant, calling Miss California a “dumb bitch”, though he confesses he was really wanting to use the “c-word” instead.

First of all, what the hell is that non-lipstick fag-in-drag doing judging beauty or women? Two things he obviously has very little knowledge or familiarity with?

Secondly, does this raging-queen know that President Obama and Vice President Biden hold and have expressed the exact same view as Miss Prejean in regards to gay marriage? Is he also calling President Obama and VP Biden the “c-word”?

Not hot

Not hot

Hopefully, Miss Prejean will stick to her values and stand by her comment and not feel the need or pressure to apologize for her remarks. She should come out and say, as a Christian I believe that homosexuality is wrong and that gay marriage is just as wrong.

The American Left has no problem allowing Islam to subjugate their women and kill homosexuals as a part of their religion. Why can’t the Left allow the Christian right to simply denounce (without all that stoning and torturing) homosexuals based on their religious beliefs?

_______

OTHERS:

Michelle Malkin:

Gossip blogger/barrel-scraper Perez Hilton was a judge at the Miss USA pageant last night. He asked Miss California, Carrie Prejean, whether she supported legalizing gay marriage. Prejean answered respectfully that she disagreed with the legalization movement, but supported states’ rights to put the question up for a vote. She was booed.

[snip]

The Miss USA pageant should be ashamed for providing Perez Hilton a platform for his intolerant bigotry and abuse of Carrie Prejean. Instead, the pageant director for the Miss California contest is condemning Prejean — and Hilton is gloating.

Discussion

10 comments for “Perez Hilton is a Barrel-Scraping Fairy”

  1. Outside hollywood, Perez Hilton is a nobody.
    I can’t believe he was one of the judges in a beauty contest.

    But I didn’t like seeing FoxNews give this any air time because most know that even negative media exposure is Free Advertising…..for Perez, in this case.
    He didn’t deserve the air time and now even More people have heard his name and will google him out of curiosity.

    Posted by SB Smith | April 21, 2009, 11:45 am
  2. Perez Hilton is alot like Paris Hilton. A noboby who somehow got their name in the tabloids and now exploits it with nauseating regularity even chance he gets. I can’t stand the sight of him or his whiny know it all voice. I’m glad Miss California answered that question honestly and I hope she stands by her answer.

    Posted by ronkerr | April 21, 2009, 12:10 pm
  3. The people who run the pageant should shoulder a lot of the blame. If look at his website, it’s all blowjob jokes.

    Posted by Anonymous | April 21, 2009, 1:55 pm
  4. Perez Hilton is nothing more than a gossip whore who preaches tolerance of his alternative lifestyle.

    The problem is, liberals equate tolerance with open-arms acceptance. If you don’t accept their viewpoint, you are nothing more than a bigoted America hater who ought to be shipped to Gitmo.

    It is ironic that this no-talent hack (who has to STEAL a name for crissakes) wants to shriek and employ fascist techniques to the opposition, when 70 years ago, those fascists would have shipped him off to a camp?

    Posted by Sam | April 21, 2009, 2:32 pm
  5. why, on earth, is a bunch of fairies watching Miss America? Apparently, there was a bunch of em in the crowd. For why? What do they get? Huh?

    Posted by Artruen | April 21, 2009, 7:22 pm
  6. GREAT headline Robbie. For the first time, I hit his website. What a tool. The commenters are interesting though in regards to this subject. LOTS of them are bored with the guy and a few pointed out the left’s (his) hypocrisy in failing to respect another’s opinion. I was pretty surprised. Now I have to go take a shower – that website is just nasty.

    Posted by pam | April 21, 2009, 9:27 pm
  7. SO REFRESHING TO SEE A YOUNG PERSON WITH SOME LOYALTY TO HER GOD. HOPEFULLY HE WILL BLESS HER FUTURE WITH GREAT THINGS. WE AMERICANS WOULD BE LUCKY TO HAVE HER BECOME INVOLVED IN POLITICS. AS FOR HILTON, MAY GOD BE MERCIFUL TO HIM AND OTHERS LIKE HIM. WHAT ON EARTH IS A GAY MAN DOING JUDGING WOMEN ON QUALITY AND BEAUTY? THESE CONTESTS SHOULD BE BOYCOTTED BY GOD-FEARING PEOPLE AND ANYONE WITH RESPECT FOR FREEDOM OF SPEECH OR RELIGION.

    Posted by JAN | April 21, 2009, 10:18 pm
  8. i read that mr. (?) hilton said she should keep her politics out of the miss america pagent. isn’t that what he did when he asked the question?

    Posted by mark | April 21, 2009, 11:45 pm
  9. Never heard of this person, til this happened.
    Someone asked why this person was even a judge for a women’s beauty pageant, and to me is the question that should be asked of the pageant director.
    To me, it’s another example of the militant homosexual agenda, and are now given opportunities to punish those who don’t follow their group think.

    Which brings me to an email I received from a web buddy, Jim Baxter.

    Mind over glands

    The defenders of homosexuality continue the oxymoron
    contradiction of attempting to use the mind to justify the
    rule of carnal glands.

    Thinking Americans still don’t give ‘a tinkers-sham’ what
    homosexuals do with their body-parts. An individual or
    a society which is by law and tradition committed to the
    natural human hierarchy of mind over body will not, how-
    ever, sanction glandular rule over the human mind.

    Undisciplined human desire can induce distorted perception.
    The disturbed personality or inverted character can be
    considered to be cognitively confused. This description is
    confirmed by the work of English psychoanalyst Money-
    Kyrle, who indicates that it is more accurate to recognize
    such a condition as the result of distorted perception.

    Neurosis, psychosis, stunting of growth, etc., are all, from
    this perspective, cognitive diseases contaminating not only
    perception but thinking, learning, remembering, valuing, and
    decision- and choice-making.

    Money-Kyrle affirms that scientific truth is not attained by a
    trendy self-serving fashion, confession of inadequacy,
    abdication, or collective majority-vote.
    There is no excuse for professional ignorance willfully maintained.

    By definition, a standard that is flexible is not a standard at all.
    The human mind requires a standard of comparison that is
    invariable. A criterion must be greater than the value measured
    in order to supply value-meaning in a predictable direction of
    survival and progression. The mind thus equipped is enabled
    to maintain a natural dominion over the body and its appetites.
    The very survival of the body itself, therefore, depends upon this
    maintained intellectual authority.

    Our posterity cannot respect what it does not perceive, and it
    cannot perceive that which has been abandoned or inverted to
    an appetite of physical expediency by the equivocal person.

    With confidence in the laws of human nature, we can know that
    in the clash between carnality and intellect, the ‘man of the mind’
    will always prevail. That is nature’s way and intent all along.

    Jim Baxter

    Posted by No2Liberals | April 22, 2009, 7:53 am
  10. Miss California’s got cahones for answering the question honestly. The end result is that she’s more popular (or at least well known) now than she would have been if she had won

    Posted by Nomad | April 23, 2009, 11:06 pm

Post a comment

Quicktags:


Related Posts:
  • Friday Eye Candy: Monica Aguilar Hired By Austin Toros
  • Perez Hilton Not Invited to Judge “Miss Beautiful Morals” Contest
  • Sand Volleyball Coming to a College Campus Near You
  • Raelene Aguilar — Former Miss New Mexico Busted for DUI
  • Miss England Laura Coleman: Too Fat to Be a Supermodel?