Comments on: Perez Hilton is a Barrel-Scraping Fairy

By: Nomad

Nomad — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 04:06:50 +0000

Miss California’s got cahones for answering the question honestly. The end result is that she’s more popular (or at least well known) now than she would have been if she had won

By: No2Liberals

No2Liberals — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:53:49 +0000

Never heard of this person, til this happened.
Someone asked why this person was even a judge for a women’s beauty pageant, and to me is the question that should be asked of the pageant director.
To me, it’s another example of the militant homosexual agenda, and are now given opportunities to punish those who don’t follow their group think.

Which brings me to an email I received from a web buddy, Jim Baxter.

Mind over glands

The defenders of homosexuality continue the oxymoron
contradiction of attempting to use the mind to justify the
rule of carnal glands.

Thinking Americans still don’t give ‘a tinkers-sham’ what
homosexuals do with their body-parts. An individual or
a society which is by law and tradition committed to the
natural human hierarchy of mind over body will not, how-
ever, sanction glandular rule over the human mind.

Undisciplined human desire can induce distorted perception.
The disturbed personality or inverted character can be
considered to be cognitively confused. This description is
confirmed by the work of English psychoanalyst Money-
Kyrle, who indicates that it is more accurate to recognize
such a condition as the result of distorted perception.

Neurosis, psychosis, stunting of growth, etc., are all, from
this perspective, cognitive diseases contaminating not only
perception but thinking, learning, remembering, valuing, and
decision- and choice-making.

Money-Kyrle affirms that scientific truth is not attained by a
trendy self-serving fashion, confession of inadequacy,
abdication, or collective majority-vote. There is no excuse for professional ignorance willfully maintained.

By definition, a standard that is flexible is not a standard at all.
The human mind requires a standard of comparison that is
invariable. A criterion must be greater than the value measured
in order to supply value-meaning in a predictable direction of
survival and progression. The mind thus equipped is enabled
to maintain a natural dominion over the body and its appetites.
The very survival of the body itself, therefore, depends upon this
maintained intellectual authority.

Our posterity cannot respect what it does not perceive, and it
cannot perceive that which has been abandoned or inverted to
an appetite of physical expediency by the equivocal person.

With confidence in the laws of human nature, we can know that
in the clash between carnality and intellect, the ‘man of the mind’
will always prevail. That is nature’s way and intent all along.

Jim Baxter

By: mark

mark — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:45:42 +0000

i read that mr. (?) hilton said she should keep her politics out of the miss america pagent. isn’t that what he did when he asked the question?

By: JAN

JAN — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 03:18:57 +0000

SO REFRESHING TO SEE A YOUNG PERSON WITH SOME LOYALTY TO HER GOD. HOPEFULLY HE WILL BLESS HER FUTURE WITH GREAT THINGS. WE AMERICANS WOULD BE LUCKY TO HAVE HER BECOME INVOLVED IN POLITICS. AS FOR HILTON, MAY GOD BE MERCIFUL TO HIM AND OTHERS LIKE HIM. WHAT ON EARTH IS A GAY MAN DOING JUDGING WOMEN ON QUALITY AND BEAUTY? THESE CONTESTS SHOULD BE BOYCOTTED BY GOD-FEARING PEOPLE AND ANYONE WITH RESPECT FOR FREEDOM OF SPEECH OR RELIGION.

By: pam

pam — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 02:27:17 +0000

GREAT headline Robbie. For the first time, I hit his website. What a tool. The commenters are interesting though in regards to this subject. LOTS of them are bored with the guy and a few pointed out the left’s (his) hypocrisy in failing to respect another’s opinion. I was pretty surprised. Now I have to go take a shower – that website is just nasty.

By: Artruen

Artruen — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:22:46 +0000

why, on earth, is a bunch of fairies watching Miss America? Apparently, there was a bunch of em in the crowd. For why? What do they get? Huh?

By: Sam

Sam — Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:32:33 +0000

Perez Hilton is nothing more than a gossip whore who preaches tolerance of his alternative lifestyle.

The problem is, liberals equate tolerance with open-arms acceptance. If you don’t accept their viewpoint, you are nothing more than a bigoted America hater who ought to be shipped to Gitmo.

It is ironic that this no-talent hack (who has to STEAL a name for crissakes) wants to shriek and employ fascist techniques to the opposition, when 70 years ago, those fascists would have shipped him off to a camp?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:55:03 +0000

The people who run the pageant should shoulder a lot of the blame. If look at his website, it’s all blowjob jokes.

By: ronkerr

ronkerr — Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:10:57 +0000

Perez Hilton is alot like Paris Hilton. A noboby who somehow got their name in the tabloids and now exploits it with nauseating regularity even chance he gets. I can’t stand the sight of him or his whiny know it all voice. I’m glad Miss California answered that question honestly and I hope she stands by her answer.

By: SB Smith

SB Smith — Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:45:22 +0000

Outside hollywood, Perez Hilton is a nobody.
I can’t believe he was one of the judges in a beauty contest.

But I didn’t like seeing FoxNews give this any air time because most know that even negative media exposure is Free Advertising…..for Perez, in this case.
He didn’t deserve the air time and now even More people have heard his name and will google him out of curiosity.