// you’re reading...

Barack Hussein Obama

Who you going to believe — Barack Obama or your lying eyes?

We’ve all seen the pictures of Obama disgracing and diminishing the office of the Presidency when he bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia. We’ve even seen the video.

There is absolutely zero doubt that he was bowing. There is not other way to spin it that isn’t a lie.

So, that’s exactly the route that the Obama administration is going to take. They’re going to lie and simply deny that it ever happened.

Hot Air has video.  Michael Goldfarb of The Weekly Standard wonders, “who you going to believe — Barack Obama or your lying eyes?”

Obama does know that we’ve seen the pictures and the video, right? Judge for yourself:

If the US Media had actually shown the video (they didn’t), more Americans would be ashamed at how shamefully Obama debased his office. And if the Obama-knob-slobbing media actually reported that Obama then lied about it…

Oh who am I kidding…there is no way the media will report this…which is exactly why Obama can lie about it and deny it ever happened…because he knows the media will back him up and never show the American people the truth.

The Conservative-leaning Washington Times (not to be confused with the Liberal Washington Post),  called the bow a  “shocking display of fealty to a foreign potentate” and said it violated centuries of American tradition of not deferring to royalty.

Discussion

5 comments for “Who you going to believe — Barack Obama or your lying eyes?”

  1. There may not have been a scrape, or a kowtow, but most definitely a bow, and a bow of submission.
    Even the liberal Camille Paglia gets it.

    Obama’s staffing problems are blatant — from that bleating boy of a treasury secretary to what appears to be a total vacuum where a chief of protocol should be. There has been one needless gaffe after another — from the president’s tacky appearance on a late-night comedy show to the kitsch gifts given to the British prime minister, followed by the sweater-clad first lady’s over-familiarity with the queen and culminating in the jaw-dropping spectacle of a president of the United States bowing to the king of Saudi Arabia. Why was protest about the latter indignity confined to conservatives? The silence of the major media was a disgrace. But I attribute that embarrassing incident not to Obama’s sinister or naive appeasement of the Muslim world but to a simple if costly breakdown in basic command of protocol.

    His costly breakdowns of protocol are stunning reminders to those who wish to attack us, that B-HO is weak, and has no marbles.

    Posted by No2Liberals | April 8, 2009, 10:06 pm
  2. Hmmm–I don’t know guys. Definitely a bow to be sure. Indisputable. But I’m not sure how many grand conclusions you can draw from bad protocol. I’m thinking here to of all the judgments made about H.W. Bush, G.W. Bush, Clinton, Carter, et. al. when they made their own (invariable) presidential gaffes.

    Posted by Tom | April 9, 2009, 6:53 am
  3. You can’t be serious. Explain how this is worse than the spontaneous fellatio Junior and his family have been performing on the Saudis for decades, like that a military escort to flee the US on 9/12/2001.

    Posted by Pat | April 9, 2009, 3:27 pm
  4. well patty, BDS killing your brain pretty quick huh? Must suck to be a obamacarter fan.
    Yeah, let us ignore our reason for being and bring up bush. good job. The office of The President Of the United States bows to no one. Lets think back about 240 years or so, back when we threw off the tyranny of Royalty. Became Freemen in a Free world. Hmmm. Or we could sit here and talk about George Bush. Because it is easier than facing the truth. It as a bow, it was humiliating. This person is not my president.

    Posted by Artruen | April 9, 2009, 7:17 pm

Post a comment

Quicktags: