Comments on: Obama: Using the Presidency as a Bully Pulpit to Silence Dissent

By: No2Liberals

No2Liberals — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 01:54:19 +0000

HG, that is Fox broadcasting, not Fox News.
Separate entities.
Fox broadcasting hasn’t had a late night show to compete with the other networks, so it will be interesting to see if this alleged comedienne has any success.
I know I won’t be watching.

By: HeavyGabe

HeavyGabe — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 00:28:18 +0000

back to fox… i just saw a commercial advertising the Wanda Sikes show coming up on fox late night. Olive branch or penalty?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:34:10 +0000

It’s not free speech in the sense this is a blog. However, it is protected speech as to state action which prevents criminalizing it.

And you look it up, jerk. Again, crimes have specific definitions. You don’t get to make up your own. Sam broke no laws.

p.s.: really delusional to analogize your self to potus.

By: Pat

Pat — Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:13:11 +0000

It ain’t free speech – look it up. Eliminationists like Sam are exactly why the Secret Service is now having to pull their staff off other assignments to protect the most-threatened President in the agency’s history.

Will the bullet Sam has reserved for me come after due process, or is that a librul notion too?

By: No2Liberals

No2Liberals — Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:01:34 +0000

~~Pat~~Mohammed said that?
I wouldn’t have known if you hadn’t posted it, I put his silly ass in scroll-over mode long ago.
A libturd asking a libturd DA to suppress free speech.
Synchronicity achieved.
LOL!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 25 Oct 2009 17:50:56 +0000

I think I’ll ask the Travis County DA’s office to define that legal term of art for us. Talk soon! POSTED BY PAT

Knock yourself out, prick. But, if I were you, I wouldn’t misrepresent what was posted, otherwise, the DA may think you are attempting to file a false criminal complaint, which really is a crime.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 25 Oct 2009 17:45:03 +0000

And keep lobbing those terroristic threats, you prick, it’s not protected speech just because it’s in the echo chamber here. POSTED BY PAT
He made no terrorist threats, you prick. You don’t get to make up your own definitions of criminal statutes.

By: Pat

Pat — Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:38:30 +0000

Nobody put threats on you

there will be bullets for Pat

I think I’ll ask the Travis County DA’s office to define that legal term of art for us. Talk soon!