Comments on: Weekend “Wedding Dress and the Boobs Who Wear Them” Blogging

By: gaegbasfrgsrg

gaegbasfrgsrg — Fri, 02 Jul 2010 02:30:49 +0000

she is a bitch

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 21:32:23 +0000

Nothing wrong with the dress, per se. It’s just 10 sizes too small for her.

Either, these brides are incredibly tacky or they are in the sex industry. I suspect it’s the sex industry.

By: Tracy

Tracy — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 00:51:59 +0000

Glad you got a laugh out of it — I sure did!

By: No2Liberals

No2Liberals — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 00:29:11 +0000

when one interprets this word by the other definition — female breasts — then this blog title does not quite “fit”

Tracy, since you put it that way, the only thing that fits is the blog title. I was so turned off by the attire, and the massive mammaries, I didn't even notice how appropriate the title was.

By: Tracy

Tracy — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 23:57:46 +0000

Hmmm . . . I can’t resist making a tongue-in-cheek, joking comment about the double meaning in the title of this post, as it made me laugh:

The double entredre works best with only one interpretation of the word “boobs.” If one interprets this word by one definition — stupid people; fools; dunces . . . or blunders; mistakes — the title works quite well. However, when one interprets this word by the other definition — female breasts — then this blog title does not quite “fit” since, as one could legitimately argue, this particular part of either of the above brides’ anatomies is not exactly WEARING ANYTHING, as the top portion of the brides’ gowns most certainly do not “fit”!

I have to agree though — I can’t imagine the fathers (or the mothers) of these brides being proud of their daughters. Nor can I imagine how any groom could be proud to walk down the aisle with their new wife looking like a tart who is seemingly advertising herself to all of their guests, including his family and friends, in such a salacious manner.

Perhaps these brides purchased a two-piece wedding gown and, due to wedding-day nerves, simply forgot to put on the top portions of their wedding gowns . . .

By: No2Liberals

No2Liberals — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 19:28:54 +0000

I know what you mean.
The meat world has been wearing me out this year.
I’m glad to help, only wish I had more time.

By: Robbie Cooper

Robbie Cooper — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:43:24 +0000

It has been — been extra real-life busy. But I’m feeling much less stressed for time, and will be back to normal blogging frequency now.

I’ve really appreciated your contributions during the slow down.

By: No2Liberals

No2Liberals — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 05:11:55 +0000

I’ve noticed since Thanksgiving that blogging seems slower than normal.
As for these women, feh.
I’m a legs and glutes man, myself.

By: Lisa Bloom

Lisa Bloom — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 04:51:12 +0000

Hi ,

I just wanted to say that I love reading your blog.

As a bride-to-be on a tight budget, I recently discovered an online bridal jewelry store called GlamForLess.com.
Though their website is plain and simple, I found some great deals on jewelry sets for me and my bridesmaids.

I think other readers on a tight budget may also find GlamForLess.com to be helpful.
You may want to check them out at http://www.glamforless.com/ and inform other readers about it.

Keep up the good work.

Best regards,
Lisa Bloom