During the confirmation hearings of Supreme (Liar) Court nominee Elena Kaga, she declines to say (video) whether or not the Federal government has the power to dictate what Americans are allowed to eat.

Which made this front page image from Drudge all the more ironic:

Drudge on Kagan

Twinkies for me, but not for thee

Look at the jowls and neck (or lack of) on this one, people. Have you seen those pictures of people who end up with dogs or cats that look just like them? Yeah? Well then why do I get the feeling that she owns a bulldog?

Do you really want to get your nutritional guidance dictates from someone who doesn’t really seem to care too much for their own nutrition? Just because she’s a medical professional in the world of partial-birth abortions doesn’t also make her a nutritionist…

Is there any part of our own lives that we are able to control and have absolute freedom over? Or are we content to let the government make all of our decisions for us (you know, for our own good)?

Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post

  4 Responses to “Elena Kagan: Cupcakes for me, but not for thee?”

  1. upset that you chose to insult bulldogs like that

  2. She looks like another typically pissed-off liberal.

    Obviously pissed ’cause she doesn’t yet have enough power.

    Her only dream is to reign over (what is yet to be) her subjects.

  3. Hotdog pack on the back of her neck?

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

© 2010 UrbanGrounds

Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha