Journolist founder and all-around Boy Wonder Ezra Klein (a world renowned expert on…well, just about every thing…to include Global Warming) asks via his Washington Post column, “Is it cheaper to just let the planet heat?

The answer is much easier than the 523 words Ezra needed to eventually not answer his own question — the answer is a resounding, “Hell, yes.”

And that’s simply because there’s nothing we can do to prevent the earth from heating. Just as there’s nothing we can do to stop it from cooling, when it so decides to reverse directions and go in that direction.

So, any money spent on trying to “prevent the earth from heating” is wasted money. But hey…when it’s other people’s money the government is playing with, what’s the problem…

Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post

  One Response to “Why Yes, Ezra, it is Cheaper to Just Let the Planet Heat”

  1. That we could control the heating or cooling of the planet is arrogance

    reserved for the dastardly minds that seek nothing more than control

    of sheeple, more specifically their money.

    It’s a perfect learning lesson about the Al Gores of the world that know

    big money can be had when a deviant can convince the non-thinkers

    to hand over their cash to keep the sky from falling.

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

© 2010 UrbanGrounds

Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha