|If rich aren’t paying their “fair share,” then what’s fair?||Sila Sahin — First Muslim Woman to Pose for Playboy|
Michael Baron asks the question:
I did, and I remember the first day of classes, when mild-mannered professor Boris Bittker asked a simple question, “What is income?”
I was pretty confident I could come up with a quick answer and so were a lot of other students. By the end of the hour, after professor Bittker had politely punched huge holes in every student’s definition, it was pretty clear that none of us could. Income is a slippery concept, especially slippery when you’re trying to tax it.
Which leads me to think that Obama may have avoided Tax 1. Or perhaps he dozed off in class. For in his April 13 speech at George Washington University, the speech to which Standard & Poor’s responded by reducing the government’s credit rating to “negative,” he seemed to think he could get all the money we need to balance the budget from higher taxes on the rich.
That’s wrong as a matter of simple arithmetic, as is clear from a chart reproduced on the Wall Street Journal editorial page showing the total amounts of taxable income of each group.
Hell, I haven’t even seen any proof that Obama actually did go to law school (other than telling us that he did).
- 12/8/2011 -- A Lesson in Fairness For Obama (0)
- 9/21/2011 -- Former President Bill Clinton to Obama: Raising Taxes Won’t Work, You Dumbass (1)
- 7/11/2012 -- Senate DemocRats Kill Vote On Øbama’s ‘Soak The Rich’ Tax Plan (0)
- 1/1/2013 -- Obama’s wrong (again): This ‘cliff’ deal still raises taxes on the middle class (0)
- 8/4/2009 -- Grab Your Ankles: Obama’s Plan to Tax Everybody (0)