Jul 102011
 

Never had any interest in the comings and goings of the Royal family, much less the Royal wedding, but I must say this image has been an inspiration.

Like a candle in the wind

Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post

  12 Responses to “The Princess Has No Knickers”

  1. Well, Robbie, she could just be wearing Ye Olde Royal! Thonge

  2. My Darling Democrat notes that the line that appears where the thigh meets the buttock appears to be the transition from the panty to the stocking in a pair of pantyhose — and that we should assume that the darkening of the buttock itself is from the panty portion of the pantyhose. It is therefore fair to assume that she is wearing a nude or suntan pair of pantyhose, with what is underneath left only to our imaginations.

    • Upon further examination, I will concede the pantyhose, as there does appear to be a reflection of light or a sheen on her legs.
      After that I can only conclude there is a definite absence of bloomers and that she must work out.
      After this shot was taken in Canada, I fully expect there will be some serious discussions about her wardrobe. I’ve been told even a slip probably wouldn’t have prevented her Marilyn Monroe moment, but that adding tiny shower curtain weights to the hem of a skirt can prevent this from occurring.
      Quite a Royal bum, though.

  3. n2l….my dear friend. My hat is off to your 180 degree turn around in your visual appraisal of the beauty of female features. All women, of course, possess alluring beauty, but I remember a time in Angeles City, PI, that unless a lady was wearing high heeled knee boots, rose red lipstick, big hair and a small shoulder purse, you wouldn’t give her a second look. …or should I say we. Now we are older and wiser. Wanna go back to the PI for a while….I’ll foot the airfare?

    • Now grampabob, you know that isn’t true. I haven’t done a 180 on the allure and beauty of the female form, but I have done many 360s. As for the LBFMs we encountered in our time in the PI, I was never that rigid about their appearance, sometimes I would give them a look if they wore nothing at all.
      You really want to go back to the PI? That would be a hoot, but it could never be the same. I wonder if Det. DeLeon is still there and if he still has those unauthorized audio tapes.

  4. Oh dear…
    The Royal Thong…..assuming she’s wearing even That !

    I want to see Queen Elizabeth’s face when she sees that photo.
    LOL
    And I’ll bet you won’t see a photo like that again !
    She’ll (Kate, I mean) at least have on bikini underwear after this with a dress.
    I’m just guessing here.

    • I’m betting this was a once in a lifetime public photo and she will be wearing elegant form fitting skirts in the future. That wispy thing she had on had a waist band as high as Moochelle’s belts.

  5. What I want to know is who is the idiot bending the shit out of some expensive Stetsons?

  6. I don’t care what you say. All I see is a nice looking haunch of Yorkshire prime. Well marbled too!

    • Really?
      I see a lean rump roast.

      • No, it’s more of filet mignon type.
        She might have a royal thong on but that’s it.
        The Queen will straighten that out in short order.

        • Ohh, as I said earlier, I would LOVE to be a fly on the wall and see the Queen’s unfiltered/uncensored reaction to that photo.
          LOL
          Actually I don’t think William would be that amused either.

          As no2liberals said this was a once in a lifetime photo.

          And it seems like someone would have schooled them about the Stetsons.
          Unfortunately not.

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

© 2010 UrbanGrounds

Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha