Aug 092012
 

As France readies to impose a 75% tax rate on their wealthiest citizens (which will not include Johnny Depp, who fled back to his I-suddenly-don’t-hate-America-as-much-as-I-thought-I-did homeland), socialists around the world and here at home are calling for a “maximum income” to go along with a much-higher minimum income.

Business Insider takes a look at what such a Socialist’s wet dream would do the the US:

 But wait, how would this idea even work? What would it do? We don’t know what would happen if we applied a top marginal rate of 100% because something like this has never been tried in an advanced economy that I’m aware of. But for the super-rich, it certainly sends a clear message: Don’t work so hard. And if you want to work hard, do it some place else.

“The obvious problem is it’s an absolute cliff for people at the top, so what’s the point of working here?” said Roberton Williams, of the Tax Policy Center. “Once you hit $5 million, it might actually cost you money to work because of all the phase-outs. The 100% tax is as a big a work disincentive as you can find.”

Go read the entire post.

Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post

  2 Responses to “Here’s What A Maximum Income Would Do To The US”

  1. What amazes me is that immediately after writing an article proposing grand theft, this Nolan person isn’t seized by an angry mob then tarred and feathered. It isn’t wealthy people that are the problem in this country, it is our government stealing it from us.
    The current occupant of the White Hut, Pres_ent Øbama, must really have dreams of his father, as his alleged Kenyan father was an economist in Kenya that proposed the exact same 100% tax and was strongly rebuked for proposing it.
    What Pres_ent Øbama is proposing is just raising the tax rate on the wealthiest citizens, which is still just as bad and just as stupid.

    Long-run Macroeconomic Impact of Increasing Tax Rates on High-income Taxpayers in 2013(PDF)
    Drs. Robert Carroll and Gerald Prante, Ernst & Young LLP

    Executive Summary …

    This report finds that these higher marginal tax rates result in a smaller economy, fewer jobs, less investment, and lower wages. Specifically, this report finds that the higher tax rates will have significant adverse economic effects in the long-run: lowering output, employment, investment, the capital stock, and real after-tax wages when the resulting revenue is used to finance additional government spending.

    Long-run macroeconomic impact of increasing tax rates on high-income taxpayers in 2013

    Through lower after-tax rewards to work, the higher tax rates on wages reduce work effort and labor force participation. The higher tax rates on capital gains and dividend increase the cost of equity capital, which discourages savings and reduces investment. Capital investment falls, which reduces labor productivity and means lower output and living standards in the long-run.

    Output in the long-run would fall by 1.3%, or $200 billion, in today’s economy.

    Employment in the long-run would fall by 0.5% or, roughly 710,000 fewer jobs, in today’s economy.

    Capital stock and investment in the long-run would fall by 1.4% and 2.4%, respectively.

    Real after-tax wages would fall by 1.8%, reflecting a decline in workers living standards relative to what would have occurred otherwise.

    These results suggest real long-run economic consequences for allowing the top two ordinary tax rates and investment tax rates to rise in 2013. This policy path can be expected to reduce long-run output, investment and net worth.

    Common sense tells us that excessively taxing the highest earners in this country is a really bad idea, which is why those on the left can’t understand it.

  2. “This report finds that these higher marginal tax rates result in a smaller economy, fewer jobs, less investment, and lower wages. Specifically, this report finds that the higher tax rates will have significant adverse economic effects in the long-run: lowering output, employment, investment, the capital stock, and real after-tax wages when the resulting revenue is used to finance additional government spending.”

    We already have all these things, why bother the rich?

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>