Nov 272012
 
house made of money

Congress wants to raise the tax on every single person who owns or lives in a house.

In a quest to find more revenue sources with which our leviathan government can feed their out-of-control spending habit, Congress is looking to steal a big part of the housing market investment strategy: the mortgage deduction:

A tax break that has long been untouchable could soon be in for some serious scrutiny.

Many home buyers deduct their mortgage interest when assessing their tax bill, a perk that has helped bolster the income of millions of families — and the broader housing market.

But as President Obama and Congress try to hash out a deal to reduce the budget deficit, the mortgage interest deduction will likely be part of the discussion.

Limits on a broad array of deductions could emerge in any budget deal. It is likely that any caps would be structured to aim at high-income households, and would diminish or end the mortgage tax break for many of those taxpayers.

For all of you fools who voted for Obama, believing that he would only raise taxes on the evil %1 and those making over $250K per year: suckers! Do you own a home? Well guess what? Or taxes just went up. A lot.

Don’t own your home and rent instead? Well, guess what? Your landlord’s taxes just went up. A lot. And guess how he’s going to pay that tax increase? If you guessed, “raise my rent,” BINGO!

And if you believe that Obama and Congress simply want this new source of revenue as part of a plan to decrease the deficit, well you are a deluded moron. The only thing they want to do with new revenue is redistribute and spend.

Period.

The $83 billion in tax savings from the mortgage deduction? Would fund our government for 8.3 days. Without reducing the deficit by a single penny.

As a homeowner who benefits from this exemption, I’d be all for eliminating this deduction and ALL other deductions. With one simple caveat: implement either the flat tax or the national sales tax (fair tax). Preferably the flat tax. We need every single voter to have some skin in the game, unlike our current system, which exempts nearly half of ‘em.

Mark Steyn on the folly of overtaxing the wealthy (and the idiocy of Warren Buffett):

If you took every single penny that Warren Buffett has, it’d pay for 4-1/2 days of the US government. This tax-the-rich won’t work. The problem here is the government is way bigger than even the capacity of the rich to sustain it. The Buffett Rule would raise $3.2 billion a year, and take 514 years just to pay off Obama’s 2011 budget deficit.

If you think only the wealthy are going to be hit by what’s coming, think again. The fiscal cliff is going to drag everyone else down with it. It’s just the warm-up for the total societal collapse of the United States.

The Weekly Standard warns folks to “watch what Warren Buffett does, not what he says.” You know, kinda like Al Gore flying around in his private jet to warn the rest of us to reduce our carbon footprint…

Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post

  7 Responses to “Fiscal Cliff — Eliminate the Mortgage Deduction (therefore raising taxes on everybody)”

  1. I’ve heard plans to eliminate this deduction but only as part of the flat tax scenario you mentioned.

    However, from a landlord perspective (and I am one) it would not affect me on that side. Mortgage interest deduction on rental properties is from a different Code section as it is considered a business expense (as are property taxes, hazard insurance, and all the repairs I needed when I had to evict non-paying tenants recently), not a personal deduction.

  2. I used to be a flat tax advocate. I morphed into a consumption tax advocate. That way the moochers would have to pay a Fed. sales type tax on all their 72″flat screens, potato chips and 40 ouncers. I just wish we could tax their drugs and what they shoplift.

    • My only concern for a fair tax (consumption tax) is that it is a source of revenue that our Congress critters have been salivating about getting their dirty paws on…which makes me believe that we would end up with both a consumption tax AND an income tax. Double-whammy.

  3. whats a 40 ouncer ?

  4. @Tom R from Texas: 40 ouncer? Spoken like a true racist asshole from Texas. You deserve Rick Perry, you prick.

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>