San Francisco’s Sexual Deviants in an Uproar Over Proposed Public Nudity Ban

UPDATE — The ban has (barely) passed.

Undressing in public will likely no longer go unpunished in San Francisco, as the Board of Supervisors voted by the barest of margins Tuesday to ban public nudity.

Derided by nudity defenders as an attack on personal expression and supported by others who’ve had enough of seeing those who let it all hang out, the legislation bans genital exposure on all city sidewalks, plazas, parklets, streets and public transit.

All you need to know about these freaks is contained in this passage:

About five men and women disrobed and were immediately escorted out of the chamber by San Francisco Sheriff’s deputies, but no arrests were made.

As he pulled his pants up, a nudist named Stardust said the legislation sent the wrong message.

That’s right…his name is “Stardust.”

NOTE: I typically like to use representative images with most of my blog posts. But there is no way I’m posting a picture of these freaks on my blog. For goodness sake, my mother reads my blog.

___________________

There is perhaps no city in America that has embraced debauchery and degeneracy more fervently than the immoral sickos in San Francisco.

And even they are tired of these perverts and sexual deviants in their midst:

City lawmakers are scheduled to vote Tuesday on an ordinance that would prohibit nudity in most public places, a blanket ban that represents an escalation of a two-year tiff between a devoted group of men who strut their stuff through the city’s famously gay Castro District and the supervisor who represents the area.

Supervisor Scott Wiener’s proposal would make it illegal for a person over the age of 5 to “expose his or her genitals, perineum or anal region on any public street, sidewalk, street median, parklet or plaza” or while using public transit.

Wait. Full stop.

The City Supervisor who is trying to put a stop to a bunch of old men running around the city with their wieners flapping in the wind is named Wiener?

Are you freak’n kidding me? That’s like having a Congressman who tweets pictures of his wiener actually being named Rep. Wiener. Wait. What? You mean that actually happened, too?

But I digress:

A first offense would carry a maximum penalty of a $100 fine, but prosecutors would have authority to charge a third violation as a misdemeanor punishable by up to a $500 fine and a year in jail. Exemptions would be made for participants at permitted street fairs and parades, such as the city’s annual gay pride event and the Folsom Street Fair, which celebrates sadomasochism and other sexual subcultures.

Well, of course we’d have to have an exemption to public lewdness and decency laws for your well-known degenerate parade of perverts and sexual deviants. Because nothing says “family values” quite like walking down a public street and watching two grey-haired, leather-chap wearing men pluger-raping each other at the bus stop.

Wiener said he resisted introducing the ordinance, but felt compelled to act after constituents complained about the naked men who gather in a small Castro plaza most days and sometimes walk the streets au naturel. He persuaded his colleagues last year to pass a law requiring a cloth to be placed between public seating and bare rears, yet the complaints have continued.

“I don’t think having some guys taking their clothes off and hanging out seven days a week at Castro and Market Street is really what San Francisco is about. I think it’s a caricature of what San Francisco is about,” Wiener said.

Actually, Mr. Wiener, I think that’s precisely what your city is all about.

Stripped down to his sunglasses and hiking boots, McCray Winpsett, 37, said he understands the disgust of residents who would prefer not to see the body modifications and sex enhancement devices sported by some of the Castro nudists. But he thinks Wiener’s prohibition goes too far in undermining a tradition “that keeps San Francisco weird.”

So, they’re not just standing around naked…they’re standing around naked with their junk “modified” and sporting “sex enhancement devices”? I don’t want to come across as some Bible- and gun-clinging knuckle dragger — but I’m not even sure I know what the hell that means or what type of “sex enhancement devices” these freaks are (publicly) using on each other.