Nov 292012
 
Susan Rice

You know how I know you’re a lying sack of shit, Susan? You work in the Obama administration.

So, Susan Rice met with some GOP Senators to try and spin the myriad reasons she lied to the American public about the terror attacks in Benghazi and the Obama administrations reasons for lying through their teeth about it.

Apparently that didn’t go so well. Not even with the Queen RINO, Sen. Susan Collins from Maine.

Like Jonah and Andy, I too believe that what happened in Benghazi and the subsequent lies and cover up are likely impeachable offenses.

I’m still disgusted and mystified that this lying clusterfuck of a miserable failure was re-elected. As Jonah so rightly notes:

…it’s inconceivable to me that a majority can stomach the notion that four Americans were murdered on sovereign American territory while the president of the United States took note, then rolled over and went to bed before flying to Las Vegas on a campaign swing, secure in the knowledge that the truth would never come out because it didn’t fit his media protectors’ beloved “narrative” that GM was alive and Osama bin Laden was dead.

Not only that…but then lied through his teeth about it. Not only that…but outed and arrested the anonymous film maker who made the film that they blamed (lied) for the attack.

To date, only one MFM journalist has attempted to get to the bottom of the story, and has disregarded the lies and talking points the rest of her cohorts are lapping up. And that is CBS News’ Sharyl Attkisson.:

Speaking on CBS’ “Face the Nation” on behalf of the White House five days after the attacks, U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice did not directly say an al Qaeda affiliate was suspected or point to terrorism. She said the “assessment at present” was that the attacks began “spontaneously” in response to an inflammatory anti-Islam video posted on YouTube. She added that “extremist elements” then joined the effort.

Tuesday, for the first time, Rice stated outright that there was never any protest or demonstration. Republicans who have read the same intelligence that Rice accessed say it’s laced with references to al Qaeda and terrorism, and they’re mystified as how she could have come away with a primary narrative about a spontaneous protest and a video.

[snip]

Republicans are not satisfied and want to know why Secretary of State Hillary Clinton also seemed to embrace the video storyline, relying on evidence that proved far more tenuous than the links to terror. The father of Benghazi victim Tyrone Woods has said that Clinton made no mention of the terrorists who killed his son, but told him the U.S. would “make sure that the person who made that [YouTube video] is arrested and prosecuted.”

The Obama administration hasn’t responded to CBS News questions as to whether Clinton made such a statement, and under what premise she planned to arrest the maker of the video since there was nothing illegal about the content.

I have exactly zero doubt that Hillary said exactly what Tyrone Woods father said she did. And that’s the reason that the Obama regime has refused to answer any questions about it.

Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post

  2 Responses to “I Hope Susan Rice is Nominated for Secretary of State For No Other Reason Than to Get Her Under Oath to Answer Some Questions About Benghazi”

  1. If I was a conspiracy theorist, I would suggest that BHO & co. were looking for excuses to crack down on freedom of speech with an eye to silencing criticism of Islam, bringing the US one step closer to sharia law.

    But I’m not a conspiracy theorist, just a cynical curmudgeon. So instead I’m suggesting that BHO & co. were (and are) trying to bury anything that might make it look like BHO’s foreign policy has been any less of a miserable failure than his domestic policy.

    And if I was a conspiracy theorist (which of course I’m not) I would point out that neither his foreign policy nor his domestic policy has been a failure, as they both had exactly the effects that he wanted them to have.

    And speaking of foreign policy, the ever-sagacious Mr. Greenfield maintains that we have no foreign policy and haven’t had one since a long time before BHO came along.

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>